- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,109
- Reaction score
- 52,116
This is just ESPN-level thinking. The only team that can win games on the road against any team? Really? They were a Dez Bryant fingertip from losing that game.
Nice choice of examples choosing the Packers, we all know what happened in Green Bay last postseason. So obviously I should choose the Giants. Right now I think the Pats could beat the Packers in Green Bay, only because all of these teams are very close in strength level and it's ridiculous to say one team is a hard lock over the other.
Right now Peyton could destroy his lil bro's team, and I think the Texans could do the same.
Putting the Broncos at #10 is hilarious given that Peyton is currently playing at an even higher level than his 2004 MVP season, which was his best season ever.
I'm sorry, but this is a comical post.
The Giants walked into SF and systematically destroyed the 49ers. Way to use the Cowboys as a straw man argument. With their core group of players and coaching, the Giants put together 5 road playoff wins in 2007 and 2011. They also went into Foxboro last year and ended Tom Brady's 30+ game winning streak at home without Hakeem Nicks! Do you really think they are just another team?
I just used the Packers as an example because (A) Lambeau field is a really tough place for a visiting team, and (B) they have an awesome passing game which the Giants can shut down but most teams can't. It helps to have the best defensive line in football. And thanks for pointing out that the Giants dismantled a 15-1 Packers team last year and essentially have the same players. Bottom line is they have the personnel to do that, while other teams do not.
As for the Broncos, I didn't realize that Peyton Manning is the only player on the team and that because he is playing at a high level, the Broncos are better than the 2004 Colts. It's weird, because I just checked the standings and the Broncos are just 4-3 and have been slaughtered by strong opponents, often digging holes of 20+ points. I thought putting them at #10 was reasonable. But I guess they should be #1 because they "could" destroy the Giants.