- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 35,696
- Reaction score
- 7,798
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What about Tom Jackson, who said (and you have to listen carefully because they were going to commercial) that the Pats won with "SMOKE AND MIRRORS". What a horse's patoot!
What about Tom Jackson, who said (and you have to listen carefully because they were going to commercial) that the Pats won with "SMOKE AND MIRRORS". What a horse's patoot!
Is the 3-4 commentators I've already heard (and I don't watch a lot of highlights) saying that the direct snap to Faulk was us copying the Dolphins.
Um . . . I guess they haven't watched many of our games the past decade. Morons.
And several more - of course, the ones you mention weren't big games when these national announcers maybe would have been watchingi can think of at least twice when they did it, the super bowl against the panthers and in the playoffs against the chargers in jan 07
I was flipping channels and herd that, what a ass.. I dont know what to say anymore that has not been said about Tom Jackson, he just hates the Pats and Belichick..
tom jackson is a ******* ******* i dont give a flying **** what that bastard has to say
What about Tom Jackson, who said (and you have to listen carefully because they were going to commercial) that the Pats won with "SMOKE AND MIRRORS". What a horse's patoot!
Smoke and mirrors......he must me smoking something for sure....
What about Tom Jackson, who said (and you have to listen carefully because they were going to commercial) that the Pats won with "SMOKE AND MIRRORS". What a horse's patoot!
What about Tom Jackson, who said (and you have to listen carefully because they were going to commercial) that the Pats won with "SMOKE AND MIRRORS". What a horse's patoot!
True they don't know what they are commenting about...who cares though...Is the 3-4 commentators I've already heard (and I don't watch a lot of highlights) saying that the direct snap to Faulk was us copying the Dolphins.
Um . . . I guess they haven't watched many of our games the past decade. Morons.
Is the 3-4 commentators I've already heard (and I don't watch a lot of highlights) saying that the direct snap to Faulk was us copying the Dolphins.
Um . . . I guess they haven't watched many of our games the past decade. Morons.
Heck, I'll take 3-1 without Brady any way I can get it. Smoke and mirrors, blood and guts, salt-n-pepa, it's all good.