BobDigital
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 16,350
- Reaction score
- 15,044
Currently I have no reason to think they can meet the preponderance of evidence standard.
Also I would add that though it is defined as 51/49 in legal terms they will probably look to go well beyond that as it looks bad and is bad for business if you punish someone cause you decide there is a slighter chance they were guilty than innocent. I would guess the NFL is going to want at least 1 piece of hard evidence and illustrate realistic opportunity.
They have none of those things at this point as far as i know. 90 seconds is just not enough time. At minimum you probably need at least 3 minutes to do an accurate job which I am sure the Patriots would want.
Also I would add that though it is defined as 51/49 in legal terms they will probably look to go well beyond that as it looks bad and is bad for business if you punish someone cause you decide there is a slighter chance they were guilty than innocent. I would guess the NFL is going to want at least 1 piece of hard evidence and illustrate realistic opportunity.
They have none of those things at this point as far as i know. 90 seconds is just not enough time. At minimum you probably need at least 3 minutes to do an accurate job which I am sure the Patriots would want.
Last edited: