PatsChamp88
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2009
- Messages
- 2,236
- Reaction score
- 73
Who do you think you areYup, that'll fix all our problems.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Who do you think you areYup, that'll fix all our problems.
I didn't quote his career YPC. Since you can't be bothered with actually reading my posts, I will no longer read any of yours.
Taylor had that long run from the getgo, and even though it was called be by an undisciplined penalty, it made the Jets take notice that the Pats could run. Even after that run, there were a couple more good ones, setting up the ideal opportunity for play action calls, deep crossing, deep post, even a screen, tight end slants.. but non of those happened.
Those are mistakes and lack of opportunity taken by offenbsive coordinator, and Belichick, who probably had a scripted 10-20 plays and they stuck with it for 13.52 if the first quarter and came away with zero points because of their stubborness. Painfully stupid and ignorant.
This team doesn't need another running back.
Does everyone forget 2003? We won a Superbowl with Antowain Smith and a running game that I believe had the worst yards-per-carry in the entire league that year.
Either is Moss. And, that my fellow Pats fan, is the problem. Brady and the OC going for long ball when short ball wins with this team. It's completely baffling.
The run game is NOT THE PROBLEM. Play calling in the second half is. Plus - Darius Butler has been exposed as a fraud tonight. Here's to hoping the kid turns it around - but he was beyond suck today.
They seem to block all right for Faulk. He could be our best running back right now.
Yeah, because we have seen soooo much of this in the past couple years. Seriously Deus, you gotta lose the hard on for Maroney.
Are you going to try to tell me that a good running game isn't necessary to win a superbowl? Just because the 03 pats took it all without a good RB doesn't mean it's not necessary to have one. Out of all the superbowls won, most of the teams had a decent running game. We will have a much better chance at winning if we can get a talented RB. Out current crew of backs just arent that good. They aren't bad, but they aren't good.
BTW, Antowain Smith wasn't old.
I'm telling you that we don't need another running back. The 4 we have are good enough to win a championship, and we already won a championship with the worst rushing offense in the league once.
This is similar to the threads last year saying we needed better tight ends or a better 3rd receiver. They are all excuses that losers make.
The offense of this team is completely loaded at talent.
The issue isn't that we need a better running back (or TE, 3rd WR, etc). The issue is that through the past 18 games, this offense has a serious problem in the 2nd half of games, and it has nothing to do with lack of talent.
Who do you think you are
You're right. We don't "need" another running back... but I'd feel a hell of a lot safer if we had a power feature back made of energon.I'm telling you that we don't need another running back. The 4 we have are good enough to win a championship, and we already won a championship with the worst rushing offense in the league once.
This is similar to the threads last year saying we needed better tight ends or a better 3rd receiver. They are all excuses that losers make.
The offense of this team is completely loaded at talent.
The issue isn't that we need a better running back (or TE, 3rd WR, etc). The issue is that through the past 18 games, this offense has a serious problem in the 2nd half of games, and it has nothing to do with lack of talent.
Mr. Bigstuff??
Law Firm will suffice if he can lower his shoulder. I'm with everyone putting the blame on Butler. He's a nickelback at best, he can't cover by the sidelines without getting penalties.