I think you have to cut Vick a break here.
You guys have to remember to separate the HEADLINE from the QUOTE.
Headline: (written by ESPN to drive hits and stoke up controversy)
"Michael Vick sees Eagles dynasty"
Quote: "I think we have a chance to be that. I think we have a chance to develop a dynasty."
Exactly how many prevarications are in that short quote: "chance" twice and "to develop". And he goes on further:
""I think just getting to the postseason right now is our focus," he told Comcast SportsNet. "The Super Bowl is going to come if it's meant to happen. Some of the best teams have some of the best luck. Maybe we'll have some of that."
"if its meant to happen" "maybe we'll have some [luck]"
This is no where close to saying "this is the Dream Team" [V Young]. Admittedly, it is kind of silly to even utter the words dynasty if you havent won a game in the season yet, let alone won a playoff game or your 1st SB (the real first time you can start even thinking dynasty). But he put enough qualifications on it throughout all the pull quotes (and who knows what was left on the floor); that it is clear (to me anyway) he is just trying to be an leader to the team to tug at their emotions and sense of achievement by giving them a LONG TERM GOAL to get them focused on the now. - I dont see a lot to criticize when viewed that way.
BL: It is off season and mid-baseball season and ESPN needs hits to maintain advertising rates. they are just trying to create controversies where there aren't.
