PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

* Top 64: What Are Your First 4 Picks?? *


Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for the pics! :rocker:

And in FA we select Michael Bush and Ronnie Brown. Sorry Morris and Taylor.
 
Thanks for the pics! :rocker:

And in FA we select Michael Bush and Ronnie Brown. Sorry Morris and Taylor.

It was a great pleasure, my good man. Thanks for taking part. :cool:

Feel free to redraft at any point, including Free Agents.

As time allows, I will be MORE than happy to illustrate.

FootBall, it's...a bit of an OBSESSION with me, you see...:eek:
 
Here to revise my first four picks and it probably wont be the last time.:lol2:

Bottomless cup of coffee, my friend. :D

As many rounds as you see fit. :cool:

Free refills. No limit. :rocker:




1a (6-10)- DE Marcell Dareus


Marcell_Dareus_FIU_1.jpg


1b (28-32)- Flanker Jeremy Beal

Oklahoma+v+Miami+B-FqRIyjmU3l.jpg


2a (33-37)- C Mike Pouncey

PounceyMike_100101_3891_TCasey.jpg


2b (61-64)- FS Will Hill

ed5a7ba4-dd66-11de-a451-001cc4c03286.image.jpg


Sign WR Vincent Jackson

44960--nfl_large_590_Unlimited.jpg

All Top 4 either Defense or Front Wall?? LOVE it!! :rocker:
 
Hey there, first post! I'm a Pats fan from Brazil (yeah, I know, right) and today I found this terrific message board. You may not believe me, but I read this entire thread :singing:
So, to contribute to the discussion, here's my mock draft:

01. Mark Ingram, RB, Alabama
The Raiders pick looks to be higher by the day. While other teams fall, the Raiders rise, and sadly Richard Seymour could not magically become a top 10 pick. It looks very probable that Robert Quinn, Marcell Dareus and even Adrian Clayborn won't be around when the Patriots pick. And anyways, they don't feel like a good choice to me: Quinn falls into the Belichickean 3-4 OLB mold, that's for sure, but Belichick drafts by value, and drafting a former college 4-3 DE to play NFL 3-4 OLB doesn't look that valuable - or safe, for that matter. Bowers, who's been shooting up draft boards, fall into that category too. Dareus is a great fit and Clayborn a great talent, but they won't be filling that much of a need - remember, Ty Warren will be back, and Deadrick has been playing well. And the 3-4 DL is responsible of stopping the run, something the Pats have been surprising in 2010, ranking 9th in the league after facing the Bengals (19th), the Jets (2nd), Buffalo (15th), Miami (16th), the Ravens (12th) and the Chargers (17th), all top 20 and an average 13.5th.
Anyway, that doesn't bother my pick at all!
The Patriots have been mediocre so far in the running game with their committee, ranking 14th in the NFL. While it does have some nice pieces - Green-Ellis as the short yardage back and Woodhead as the third-down back -, it still needs a featured back. Since Adrian Peterson, no college back has entered the NFL with the level of talent and success Mark Ingram has - and, to an extent, Ingram is a safer bet than Peterson, for his durability and consistency. So the Patriots need to pull the trigger on the guy who'll take the pressure off Tom Brady, the guy who will make the offense unstopable, the Heisman, the new Emmit Smith: Mark Ingram. Keeping Brady's jersey clean is one of the priorities, and the best friend to a QB is a strong running game, and any team that drafts Mark Ingram will have a jump start to its rushing attack. IMO, Ingram is a Top 1 talent, the best player in the draft, but the fact most teams either run committees or have a featured back or bigger needs will drop him in the Patriots' lap.
I can already already imagine former employee Nick Saban calling Bill Belichick: "hey, Bill, I rode Ingram to a title, and so should you". Belichick likes to draft guys who his protegees like, and Saban surely likes Ingram - but then, what coach could have such a back and not like him?

01. Mike Pouncey, G/C, Florida
A player from Urban Meyer's program who's smart, tough, has good pedigree and size. A top-notch linemen who can play center and both guard positions. If that's not a Bill Belichick pick, I don't know what is.
Of course, this pick could go many ways. If somehow Robert Quinn slides this far because of his suspension, Belichick would gladly draft him, since he fits the 6'5''/250/4.6-forty prototype that coach looks for in OLBs - even tough no one in the roster right now is over 6'3'' aside from Shawn Crable, who's 6'5'' and not exactly a good story. Da'Qwan Bowers would also be tough to pass, Allen Bailley too. Still, I think protecting the franchise is the best decision, specially with Brady getting older and slower - and what's best to protect a QB than a strong running game provided by Mark Ingram and a good guard who can also play center?

02. Stefen Wisniewski, G/C Penn State
This second rounder figures to be very close to the previous first rounder, so it could be that player over here and this player over there. But anyhow, I know you're screaming "defense" by now. But New England's defense is a young up and coming unit, with many guys who'll likely contribute for years to come and shall only get better with each 2010 game. That goes for youngsters McCourty, Arrington, Butler, Wheatley, Chung, Brown, Pryor, Brace, Deadrick, Cunningham, Fletcher, Mayo, Spikes, Guyton, Ninkovich and even Crable, who feels 30 but is actually 25. So there: I just named 16 players under 27 who are learning the system and could be major contributors come 2011. Add Ty, Bodden and McGowan back to the mix and the defense is looking good and, while not having any major talent, effective with the potential to be 2001-2004 effective.
When you look at offense, the same can't be said: the 2011 OL could have only one returning starter who'll be switching sides and four question marks. I bet my left arm (I'm right handed, so don't take that heavily) that Light will be gone. Connolly looked promising but has struggled, specially against the Charger's 3-4. Koppen has underachieved, IMO, specially against strong nose tackles, while Neal has been talking about retirement for quite some time, and hasn't been playing that well anyway... So getting another guard to build a great interior O-line seems logical, and Wisniewski is another guy who, just liks Pouncey, has "Belichick pick" written all over him. He's also got the pedigree, with his father and uncle being former NFL players, and his on-field and off-the-field intelligence are amazing, something that goes well with his character and work ethic. His blocking technique is, IMO, one of the best in all of the linemen in this class and, while he won't overwhelm anyone physically, his talent and experience will make up for it. And while he may be "only" 6'3''/298, the current interior starters are 6'2''/296 (Koppen), 6'4''/205 (Neal) and 6'4''/313 (the bigger Connolly, who's been sharing time with 6'2''/300 Ohrnberger), so New England isn't looking for 6'6''/330 guards.
So, with the first three picks in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Patriots drafted a running game: two tough, mean-streaked guards who can also play center, and the best RB in years - be sure that Brady will smile and the NFL will tremble if this happens.

02. Justin Houston, OLB, Georgia
We all know New England's young defense has been a complete surprise this season. They're in the top 10 on interceptions and rushing yards per game - sure, that's great, and a nice sign for an up and coming defense... But still, the team is near the bottom in passing yards per game and has only 12 sacks - the worst team in the league, the Bucs, has 5, while the top dogs, the Chargers, have 25. Those are numbers that will likely improve, specially with Jermaine Cunningham's improved play and the many successful looks the defensive line has been showing through the games... But bottom line is: the defense still needs pass rushing help. Georgia's Justin Houston comes close enough to Belichick prototype for OLB, at 6'3'' and 257, running something like a 4.6 forty. He's got a good motor and nice instincts, stuff that you have to have to be successful in Belichick's 3-4. Houston has also been amazing this year, notching 1.13 sacks per game so far. He also feels safer than, say, Quinn because he's got experience playing OLB in a 3-4. He's not that great against the run or in coverage, something that was said about Cunningham, but his pass rushing skill set makes this pick worth it. Let's hope he declares early (something he probably will do) and that, even after the combine, he doesn't shoot up team's boards.

03. Marcus Gilbert, T/G, Florida
The guy who used to protect Tim Tebow's blindside is another pick from Urban Meyer's lips to Bill Belichick's ears. He's got the size and some talent, and something else Belichick loves: the versatility. So far the guy has played at left tackle for a right handed quarterback, at right tackle for a left handed quarterback and at both guard positions.
At the same time, this is the pick I feel the least comfortable with, but I just don't see any offensive tackle worth being drafted with 1A or 1B or 2A or 2B who's also a good fit.

03. Dontay Moch, OLB, Nevada
03. Dontay Moch, OLB, Nevada
Vernon Gholston 2.0? At 6'1'' and 245 with 4.4 speed and not-great-at-all instincts he might just be... But everyone has to wonder what kind of player Gholston would've been if he was drafted by Belichick and implemented in his complex schemes. And, in Moch's defense, he looks to have a better pass rush repertoire than Gholston's "bull rush only" and he's better against the run. I think that, at the third round, with this many picks, taking a shot at a physical specimen like Moch is well worth it.

04. Derrell Johnson-Koulianos, WR, Iowa
He can catch, run after the catch, return kicks and explode into screens - and comes with great value at the fourth round. He's 6'1'' and 205 with 4.4 speed. If he's not a Patriot wideout, no one is. Kirk Ferentz, Belichick's close friend, will likely give him the advice to draft this underrated talent. Dwayne Harris is also a nice talent and a pretty similar player, altough slower and smaller - so I give the nod to Belichick's coaching tree and go with Iowa's product.

[to be continued]
 
[...and here's the always exciting lower picks!]

05. Joe Lefeged, SS, Rutgers
A playmaking strong safety and special teams ace, McCourty's former teammate may not be the fastest or the strongest, but he's tough and smart - and that's a Patriot in my book. He's also another guy from a Belichick-related program, since Greg Schiano visits the Patriots TC every year and talks defense all the time with coach B. Last year was notable that Belichick prefers to draft players from programs he has inside information, and Lefeged is a huge leader and an important player for Schiano's team.

06. DeMarcus Van Dyke, CB, Miami
Playing with Brandon Harris sure shadows Van Dyke, but being the weaker half of a CB tandem is actually bad, since teams will throw at you while avoiding the better guy - Arrington knows it, for example. At 6'0''/180 with 4.4 speed he's a great physical specimen, and plays the zone very well, something Belichick defense has been leaning toward, specially for the nickel.

06. Chris Nield, NT, West Virginia
So far the Patriots defensive line has had two looks: one with Wilfork at nose tackle, against passing teams; and one with Wilfork at defensive end, against running teams. So while I think a 3-4 end like Adrian Clayborn or Marcell Dareus would greatly improve the front seven, I don't think it's wise to pass on amazing and unique Mark Ingram to get a guy who doesn't project to be the next Richard Seymour - there's no Suh in this draft. So, think about it: the safest route to go is to get a new nose tackle, someone who can plug the middle while still applying some pressure, another mammoth to clog the running lanes and force opposing teams into situations they don't want to be in. Nield, a 3-year starter and a team leader, is hard to run against and can make plays. At the 6th round it's hard to find better value.

07. Kenny Wiggins, T, Fresno State
Another offensive tackle for the mix, and a guy from Pat Hill's program. He's surely got the size (6'7''/315) and physical tools, and he's been improving. You shouldn't look for a franchise savior in the 7th round, of course, but Wiggins could add depth to the O-line and stick around - or, in a best case scenario, he could be coached into a starting role. That's unlikely, but stranger things have happened to Belichick-coached players.

So that's my 7-round mock. I'm sure the Patriots will get some compensatory selections and will go after some undrafted free agents, and it's crazy to say they won't make around six thousand draft-day-trades... But I won't get into that, since the possibilities are so many. Anyways, just for the record, i'd like to see Meriweather getting traded, specially if Belichick falls in love with Deunta Williams, who's a playmaker and projects well into the NFL.

Well, that's it! :D
 
Welcome, Brother Steve!! :D

Absolutely INCREDIBLE job on your Mock, sir!!

I shall circle back with the paint brushes, tomorrow morning, I think, unless I get a chance, later tonight. :cool:
 
Hey there, first post! I'm a Pats fan from Brazil (yeah, I know, right) and today I found this terrific message board. You may not believe me, but I read this entire thread :singing:
So, to contribute to the discussion, here's my mock draft:

01. Mark Ingram, RB, Alabama

mark-ingram-alabama-football.jpg


The Raiders pick looks to be higher by the day. While other teams fall, the Raiders rise, and sadly Richard Seymour could not magically become a top 10 pick. It looks very probable that Robert Quinn, Marcell Dareus and even Adrian Clayborn won't be around when the Patriots pick. And anyways, they don't feel like a good choice to me: Quinn falls into the Belichickean 3-4 OLB mold, that's for sure, but Belichick drafts by value, and drafting a former college 4-3 DE to play NFL 3-4 OLB doesn't look that valuable - or safe, for that matter. Bowers, who's been shooting up draft boards, fall into that category too. Dareus is a great fit and Clayborn a great talent, but they won't be filling that much of a need - remember, Ty Warren will be back, and Deadrick has been playing well. And the 3-4 DL is responsible of stopping the run, something the Pats have been surprising in 2010, ranking 9th in the league after facing the Bengals (19th), the Jets (2nd), Buffalo (15th), Miami (16th), the Ravens (12th) and the Chargers (17th), all top 20 and an average 13.5th. Anyway, that doesn't bother my pick at all!

The Patriots have been mediocre so far in the running game with their committee, ranking 14th in the NFL. While it does have some nice pieces - Green-Ellis as the short yardage back and Woodhead as the third-down back -, it still needs a featured back. Since Adrian Peterson, no college back has entered the NFL with the level of talent and success Mark Ingram has - and, to an extent, Ingram is a safer bet than Peterson, for his durability and consistency. So the Patriots need to pull the trigger on the guy who'll take the pressure off Tom Brady, the guy who will make the offense unstopable, the Heisman, the new Emmit Smith: Mark Ingram. Keeping Brady's jersey clean is one of the priorities, and the best friend to a QB is a strong running game, and any team that drafts Mark Ingram will have a jump start to its rushing attack. IMO, Ingram is a Top 1 talent, the best player in the draft, but the fact most teams either run committees or have a featured back or bigger needs will drop him in the Patriots' lap. I can already already imagine former employee Nick Saban calling Bill Belichick: "hey, Bill, I rode Ingram to a title, and so should you". Belichick likes to draft guys who his protegees like, and Saban surely likes Ingram - but then, what coach could have such a back and not like him?

01. Mike Pouncey, G/C, Florida

mike_pouncey.jpg


A player from Urban Meyer's program who's smart, tough, has good pedigree and size. A top-notch linemen who can play center and both guard positions. If that's not a Bill Belichick pick, I don't know what is.

Of course, this pick could go many ways. If somehow Robert Quinn slides this far because of his suspension, Belichick would gladly draft him, since he fits the 6'5''/250/4.6-forty prototype that coach looks for in OLBs - even tough no one in the roster right now is over 6'3'' aside from Shawn Crable, who's 6'5'' and not exactly a good story. Da'Qwan Bowers would also be tough to pass, Allen Bailley too. Still, I think protecting the franchise is the best decision, specially with Brady getting older and slower - and what's best to protect a QB than a strong running game provided by Mark Ingram and a good guard who can also play center?

02. Stefen Wisniewski, G/C Penn State

20100824__web_052110-kp-stefen-wisniewski-2_500.jpg


This second rounder figures to be very close to the previous first rounder, so it could be that player over here and this player over there. But anyhow, I know you're screaming "defense" by now. But New England's defense is a young up and coming unit, with many guys who'll likely contribute for years to come and shall only get better with each 2010 game. That goes for youngsters McCourty, Arrington, Butler, Wheatley, Chung, Brown, Pryor, Brace, Deadrick, Cunningham, Fletcher, Mayo, Spikes, Guyton, Ninkovich and even Crable, who feels 30 but is actually 25. So there: I just named 16 players under 27 who are learning the system and could be major contributors come 2011. Add Ty, Bodden and McGowan back to the mix and the defense is looking good and, while not having any major talent, effective with the potential to be 2001-2004 effective.

When you look at offense, the same can't be said: the 2011 OL could have only one returning starter who'll be switching sides and four question marks. I bet my left arm (I'm right handed, so don't take that heavily) that Light will be gone. Connolly looked promising but has struggled, specially against the Charger's 3-4. Koppen has underachieved, IMO, specially against strong nose tackles, while Neal has been talking about retirement for quite some time, and hasn't been playing that well anyway... So getting another guard to build a great interior O-line seems logical, and Wisniewski is another guy who, just liks Pouncey, has "Belichick pick" written all over him. He's also got the pedigree, with his father and uncle being former NFL players, and his on-field and off-the-field intelligence are amazing, something that goes well with his character and work ethic. His blocking technique is, IMO, one of the best in all of the linemen in this class and, while he won't overwhelm anyone physically, his talent and experience will make up for it. And while he may be "only" 6'3''/298, the current interior starters are 6'2''/296 (Koppen), 6'4''/205 (Neal) and 6'4''/313 (the bigger Connolly, who's been sharing time with 6'2''/300 Ohrnberger), so New England isn't looking for 6'6''/330 guards.
So, with the first three picks in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Patriots drafted a running game: two tough, mean-streaked guards who can also play center, and the best RB in years - be sure that Brady will smile and the NFL will tremble if this happens.

02. Justin Houston, OLB, Georgia

499436830.jpg


We all know New England's young defense has been a complete surprise this season. They're in the top 10 on interceptions and rushing yards per game - sure, that's great, and a nice sign for an up and coming defense... But still, the team is near the bottom in passing yards per game and has only 12 sacks - the worst team in the league, the Bucs, has 5, while the top dogs, the Chargers, have 25. Those are numbers that will likely improve, specially with Jermaine Cunningham's improved play and the many successful looks the defensive line has been showing through the games... But bottom line is: the defense still needs pass rushing help. Georgia's Justin Houston comes close enough to Belichick prototype for OLB, at 6'3'' and 257, running something like a 4.6 forty. He's got a good motor and nice instincts, stuff that you have to have to be successful in Belichick's 3-4. Houston has also been amazing this year, notching 1.13 sacks per game so far. He also feels safer than, say, Quinn because he's got experience playing OLB in a 3-4. He's not that great against the run or in coverage, something that was said about Cunningham, but his pass rushing skill set makes this pick worth it. Let's hope he declares early (something he probably will do) and that, even after the combine, he doesn't shoot up team's boards.

03. Marcus Gilbert, T/G, Florida

MarcusGilbert.jpg


The guy who used to protect Tim Tebow's blindside is another pick from Urban Meyer's lips to Bill Belichick's ears. He's got the size and some talent, and something else Belichick loves: the versatility. So far the guy has played at left tackle for a right handed quarterback, at right tackle for a left handed quarterback and at both guard positions. At the same time, this is the pick I feel the least comfortable with, but I just don't see any offensive tackle worth being drafted with 1A or 1B or 2A or 2B who's also a good fit.

03. Dontay Moch, OLB, Nevada

dontay-moch.jpg


Vernon Gholston 2.0? At 6'1'' and 245 with 4.4 speed and not-great-at-all instincts he might just be... But everyone has to wonder what kind of player Gholston would've been if he was drafted by Belichick and implemented in his complex schemes. And, in Moch's defense, he looks to have a better pass rush repertoire than Gholston's "bull rush only" and he's better against the run. I think that, at the third round, with this many picks, taking a shot at a physical specimen like Moch is well worth it.

3 Grizzlies + 2 Flankers in the first 3 Rounds??? BEAUTIFULL!!!:rocker:
 
[...and here's the always exciting lower picks!] :D

04. Derrell Johnson-Koulianos, WR, Iowa

dmrdc5-5qybal4gr3415bbms2h4_original.jpg


He can catch, run after the catch, return kicks and explode into screens - and comes with great value at the fourth round. He's 6'1'' and 205 with 4.4 speed. If he's not a Patriot wideout, no one is. Kirk Ferentz, Belichick's close friend, will likely give him the advice to draft this underrated talent. Dwayne Harris is also a nice talent and a pretty similar player, altough slower and smaller - so I give the nod to Belichick's coaching tree and go with Iowa's product.

05. Joe Lefeged, SS, Rutgers

Joe-Lefeged.jpg


A playmaking strong safety and special teams ace, McCourty's former teammate may not be the fastest or the strongest, but he's tough and smart - and that's a Patriot in my book. He's also another guy from a Belichick-related program, since Greg Schiano visits the Patriots TC every year and talks defense all the time with coach B. Last year was notable that Belichick prefers to draft players from programs he has inside information, and Lefeged is a huge leader and an important player for Schiano's team.

06. DeMarcus Van Dyke, CB, Miami

12863_0907fsu-miami.jpg


Playing with Brandon Harris sure shadows Van Dyke, but being the weaker half of a CB tandem is actually bad, since teams will throw at you while avoiding the better guy - Arrington knows it, for example. At 6'0''/180 with 4.4 speed he's a great physical specimen, and plays the zone very well, something Belichick defense has been leaning toward, specially for the nickel.

06. Chris Neild, NT, West Virginia

chris-neild.jpg


So far the Patriots defensive line has had two looks: one with Wilfork at nose tackle, against passing teams; and one with Wilfork at defensive end, against running teams. So while I think a 3-4 end like Adrian Clayborn or Marcell Dareus would greatly improve the front seven, I don't think it's wise to pass on amazing and unique Mark Ingram to get a guy who doesn't project to be the next Richard Seymour - there's no Suh in this draft. So, think about it: the safest route to go is to get a new nose tackle, someone who can plug the middle while still applying some pressure, another mammoth to clog the running lanes and force opposing teams into situations they don't want to be in. Nield, a 3-year starter and a team leader, is hard to run against and can make plays. At the 6th round it's hard to find better value.

07. Kenny Wiggins, T, Fresno State

0_lesliecooper_450x338.jpg


#60, facing us. Best I could do!! ;)

Another offensive tackle for the mix, and a guy from Pat Hill's program. He's surely got the size (6'7''/315) and physical tools, and he's been improving. You shouldn't look for a franchise savior in the 7th round, of course, but Wiggins could add depth to the O-line and stick around - or, in a best case scenario, he could be coached into a starting role. That's unlikely, but stranger things have happened to Belichick-coached players.

So that's my 7-round mock. I'm sure the Patriots will get some compensatory selections and will go after some undrafted free agents, and it's crazy to say they won't make around six thousand draft-day-trades... But I won't get into that, since the possibilities are so many. Anyways, just for the record, i'd like to see Meriweather getting traded, specially if Belichick falls in love with Deunta Williams, who's a playmaker and projects well into the NFL.

Well, that's it! :D

This MasterPiece is right up there with Brother Wilfork's classic!! AWESOME work, sir. :rocker:
 
I certainly like your emphasis on improving the OL. HOWEVER, for me, a draft is a FAIL if we don't get a DE is the first couple of rounds.

Hey there, first post! I'm a Pats fan from Brazil (yeah, I know, right) and today I found this terrific message board. You may not believe me, but I read this entire thread :singing:
So, to contribute to the discussion, here's my mock draft:

01. Mark Ingram, RB, Alabama
The Raiders pick looks to be higher by the day. While other teams fall, the Raiders rise, and sadly Richard Seymour could not magically become a top 10 pick. It looks very probable that Robert Quinn, Marcell Dareus and even Adrian Clayborn won't be around when the Patriots pick. And anyways, they don't feel like a good choice to me: Quinn falls into the Belichickean 3-4 OLB mold, that's for sure, but Belichick drafts by value, and drafting a former college 4-3 DE to play NFL 3-4 OLB doesn't look that valuable - or safe, for that matter. Bowers, who's been shooting up draft boards, fall into that category too. Dareus is a great fit and Clayborn a great talent, but they won't be filling that much of a need - remember, Ty Warren will be back, and Deadrick has been playing well. And the 3-4 DL is responsible of stopping the run, something the Pats have been surprising in 2010, ranking 9th in the league after facing the Bengals (19th), the Jets (2nd), Buffalo (15th), Miami (16th), the Ravens (12th) and the Chargers (17th), all top 20 and an average 13.5th.
Anyway, that doesn't bother my pick at all!
The Patriots have been mediocre so far in the running game with their committee, ranking 14th in the NFL. While it does have some nice pieces - Green-Ellis as the short yardage back and Woodhead as the third-down back -, it still needs a featured back. Since Adrian Peterson, no college back has entered the NFL with the level of talent and success Mark Ingram has - and, to an extent, Ingram is a safer bet than Peterson, for his durability and consistency. So the Patriots need to pull the trigger on the guy who'll take the pressure off Tom Brady, the guy who will make the offense unstopable, the Heisman, the new Emmit Smith: Mark Ingram. Keeping Brady's jersey clean is one of the priorities, and the best friend to a QB is a strong running game, and any team that drafts Mark Ingram will have a jump start to its rushing attack. IMO, Ingram is a Top 1 talent, the best player in the draft, but the fact most teams either run committees or have a featured back or bigger needs will drop him in the Patriots' lap.
I can already already imagine former employee Nick Saban calling Bill Belichick: "hey, Bill, I rode Ingram to a title, and so should you". Belichick likes to draft guys who his protegees like, and Saban surely likes Ingram - but then, what coach could have such a back and not like him?

01. Mike Pouncey, G/C, Florida
A player from Urban Meyer's program who's smart, tough, has good pedigree and size. A top-notch linemen who can play center and both guard positions. If that's not a Bill Belichick pick, I don't know what is.
Of course, this pick could go many ways. If somehow Robert Quinn slides this far because of his suspension, Belichick would gladly draft him, since he fits the 6'5''/250/4.6-forty prototype that coach looks for in OLBs - even tough no one in the roster right now is over 6'3'' aside from Shawn Crable, who's 6'5'' and not exactly a good story. Da'Qwan Bowers would also be tough to pass, Allen Bailley too. Still, I think protecting the franchise is the best decision, specially with Brady getting older and slower - and what's best to protect a QB than a strong running game provided by Mark Ingram and a good guard who can also play center?

02. Stefen Wisniewski, G/C Penn State
This second rounder figures to be very close to the previous first rounder, so it could be that player over here and this player over there. But anyhow, I know you're screaming "defense" by now. But New England's defense is a young up and coming unit, with many guys who'll likely contribute for years to come and shall only get better with each 2010 game. That goes for youngsters McCourty, Arrington, Butler, Wheatley, Chung, Brown, Pryor, Brace, Deadrick, Cunningham, Fletcher, Mayo, Spikes, Guyton, Ninkovich and even Crable, who feels 30 but is actually 25. So there: I just named 16 players under 27 who are learning the system and could be major contributors come 2011. Add Ty, Bodden and McGowan back to the mix and the defense is looking good and, while not having any major talent, effective with the potential to be 2001-2004 effective.
When you look at offense, the same can't be said: the 2011 OL could have only one returning starter who'll be switching sides and four question marks. I bet my left arm (I'm right handed, so don't take that heavily) that Light will be gone. Connolly looked promising but has struggled, specially against the Charger's 3-4. Koppen has underachieved, IMO, specially against strong nose tackles, while Neal has been talking about retirement for quite some time, and hasn't been playing that well anyway... So getting another guard to build a great interior O-line seems logical, and Wisniewski is another guy who, just liks Pouncey, has "Belichick pick" written all over him. He's also got the pedigree, with his father and uncle being former NFL players, and his on-field and off-the-field intelligence are amazing, something that goes well with his character and work ethic. His blocking technique is, IMO, one of the best in all of the linemen in this class and, while he won't overwhelm anyone physically, his talent and experience will make up for it. And while he may be "only" 6'3''/298, the current interior starters are 6'2''/296 (Koppen), 6'4''/205 (Neal) and 6'4''/313 (the bigger Connolly, who's been sharing time with 6'2''/300 Ohrnberger), so New England isn't looking for 6'6''/330 guards.
So, with the first three picks in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Patriots drafted a running game: two tough, mean-streaked guards who can also play center, and the best RB in years - be sure that Brady will smile and the NFL will tremble if this happens.

02. Justin Houston, OLB, Georgia
We all know New England's young defense has been a complete surprise this season. They're in the top 10 on interceptions and rushing yards per game - sure, that's great, and a nice sign for an up and coming defense... But still, the team is near the bottom in passing yards per game and has only 12 sacks - the worst team in the league, the Bucs, has 5, while the top dogs, the Chargers, have 25. Those are numbers that will likely improve, specially with Jermaine Cunningham's improved play and the many successful looks the defensive line has been showing through the games... But bottom line is: the defense still needs pass rushing help. Georgia's Justin Houston comes close enough to Belichick prototype for OLB, at 6'3'' and 257, running something like a 4.6 forty. He's got a good motor and nice instincts, stuff that you have to have to be successful in Belichick's 3-4. Houston has also been amazing this year, notching 1.13 sacks per game so far. He also feels safer than, say, Quinn because he's got experience playing OLB in a 3-4. He's not that great against the run or in coverage, something that was said about Cunningham, but his pass rushing skill set makes this pick worth it. Let's hope he declares early (something he probably will do) and that, even after the combine, he doesn't shoot up team's boards.

03. Marcus Gilbert, T/G, Florida
The guy who used to protect Tim Tebow's blindside is another pick from Urban Meyer's lips to Bill Belichick's ears. He's got the size and some talent, and something else Belichick loves: the versatility. So far the guy has played at left tackle for a right handed quarterback, at right tackle for a left handed quarterback and at both guard positions.
At the same time, this is the pick I feel the least comfortable with, but I just don't see any offensive tackle worth being drafted with 1A or 1B or 2A or 2B who's also a good fit.

03. Dontay Moch, OLB, Nevada
03. Dontay Moch, OLB, Nevada
Vernon Gholston 2.0? At 6'1'' and 245 with 4.4 speed and not-great-at-all instincts he might just be... But everyone has to wonder what kind of player Gholston would've been if he was drafted by Belichick and implemented in his complex schemes. And, in Moch's defense, he looks to have a better pass rush repertoire than Gholston's "bull rush only" and he's better against the run. I think that, at the third round, with this many picks, taking a shot at a physical specimen like Moch is well worth it.

04. Derrell Johnson-Koulianos, WR, Iowa
He can catch, run after the catch, return kicks and explode into screens - and comes with great value at the fourth round. He's 6'1'' and 205 with 4.4 speed. If he's not a Patriot wideout, no one is. Kirk Ferentz, Belichick's close friend, will likely give him the advice to draft this underrated talent. Dwayne Harris is also a nice talent and a pretty similar player, altough slower and smaller - so I give the nod to Belichick's coaching tree and go with Iowa's product.

[to be continued]
 
3 Grizzlies + 2 Flankers in the first 3 Rounds??? BEAUTIFULL!!!:rocker:

Brother Off the Grid, thanks a lot for the pics and the nice words! I'm glad you liked my mock.
I really liked those pics, specially Ingram's.
The term "flanker" is pretty interesting too, and cooler than "outside linebacker". I don't even like "linebacker" that much, to be honest.

Welcome.

....

Thanks!

I certainly like your emphasis on improving the OL. HOWEVER, for me, a draft is a FAIL if we don't get a DE is the first couple of rounds.

I used to think like you, so I see where you're coming from and I think it's a pretty valid opinion. But still, I just don't see it as being that much of a problem, and I don't see any major talent like Seymour or Wilfork who'd fit the 2-gap scheme while still being able to apply pressure either.
Dareus seems to be the only guy who fits the description with no question marks, but I can't see why he won't be a Cleveland Brown. In case he falls he could very well be drafted with 1A, even tough I still would believe Ingram would've been the better choice - because, right now, I see the offense as the descending unit while the defense is the ascending unit, and that's bad because Tom, who, really, is one of the (if not the one) biggest difference makers in sports. If the Patriots get rings the next 10 years, it'll be because of Brady - so give him weapons. And not Moss-like weapons, who in the end dictate too much targets and change the gameplan, but smashmouth weapons like a tough mean-streaked O-line and a All-World running back.
Other than that, I'd like to hear some suggestions from you on DEs you think fit the scheme, because I don't see that many... Just from the top of my head:
I believe Adrian Clayborn will be a better 4-3 end. I really like his energy and motor, and I don't care about his character issues, and he's from Iowa, so he could be Belichick's pick. He was on my first mock, but Ingram surpassed him based on the impact I believe each one will have on the team success'.
I don't like Allan Bailey because he's one of those college players who rely too much on his power and speed combo to be successful, and that kind of player tend to fail in the NFL.
Cameron Jordan is a name I've heard some fuzz about, but I haven't seen too much tape of him. Maybe he? I'm not easily sold on one year wonders, though.
Lawrence Guy is a guy I think has some upside, but he's not that great against the run and will most likely struggle in the point of attack while trying to cover 2 gaps. He could improve the pass rush, but IMO he couldn't ever be an every-down linemen for the Patriots.
Nick Farley has been on the rise and I was very high on Cameron Heyward and specially on Jared Crick, but 2010 hasn't been going so well to them. I think any of these two could be a nice value pick into the 2nd or 3rd round, but only if they fall and only if Belichick believes he can make any of them pull their act together.
I'd like as much as you to come from this draft with a new stud 3-4 DE to improve the D (I'm a pretty "D wins championships" guy, my 2009 mock was all-D, trust me :D ), I don't see anyone worth it in the top three rounds. Belichick will most likely go for some obscure picks into the 4th-7th rounds, IMO.
 
As this team continues to evolve ~ to EXPLODE!! ~ in front of our eyes, virtually every NEED is falling by the wayside.

We may actually end up in the RIDICULOUS position of having solid contributors at ALL positions...And a Free Hand to draft for PLEASURE...at our LEISURE. :D
 
I still would believe Ingram would've been the better choice - because, right now, I see the offense as the descending unit while the defense is the ascending unit, and that's bad because Tom, who, really, is one of the (if not the one) biggest difference makers in sports. If the Patriots get rings the next 10 years, it'll be because of Brady - so give him weapons. And not Moss-like weapons, who in the end dictate too much targets and change the gameplan, but smashmouth weapons like a tough mean-streaked O-line and a All-World running back.

The team obviously needs an upgrade at RB, but the thought of using a rare high pick on one makes me queasy. It's one of the most fungible positions on the field, and the Pats put together a pretty impressive decade without ever having anything like an "All-World running back." It was Clock Killin' Corey Dillon, not That Thrillin' Corey Dillon. ;)

So for me, I'll take a veteran FA and a mid-round pick at RB and look for a rare talent at DE, OLB or CB with my top pick. The way this draft is shaping up, one should be there.
 
The team obviously needs an upgrade at RB, but the thought of using a rare high pick on one makes me queasy. It's one of the most fungible positions on the field, and the Pats put together a pretty impressive decade without ever having anything like an "All-World running back." It was Clock Killin' Corey Dillon, not That Thrillin' Corey Dillon. ;)

So for me, I'll take a veteran FA and a mid-round pick at RB and look for a rare talent at DE, OLB or CB with my top pick. The way this draft is shaping up, one should be there.

I agree, I would love to have Ingram on the team, but not if it costs us a chance to get one of the many solid DE or OLB candidates in this draft.

With the way Penn State is playing, we could probably get Royster in the 3rd.
 
I agree, I would love to have Ingram on the team, but not if it costs us a chance to get one of the many solid DE or OLB candidates in this draft.

Agreed, look at how Clay Matthews absolutely harasses/terrorizes opposing QBs, that's what we need. There are plenty of RBs that we get to be gogs in the machine and will keep it running very well.
 
I agree, I would love to have Ingram on the team, but not if it costs us a chance to get one of the many solid DE or OLB candidates in this draft.

Right, I should say that it's nothing against Ingram he'd look great in a Patriots uniform. It's just that I'd rather have a decent RB and a stud DE or OLB than vice versa (and decent RBs are easier to find, too).
 
Last edited:
Brother Off the Grid, thanks a lot for the pics and the nice words! I'm glad you liked my mock.
I really liked those pics, specially Ingram's.
The term "flanker" is pretty interesting too, and cooler than "outside linebacker". I don't even like "linebacker" that much, to be honest.



Thanks!



I used to think like you, so I see where you're coming from and I think it's a pretty valid opinion. But still, I just don't see it as being that much of a problem, and I don't see any major talent like Seymour or Wilfork who'd fit the 2-gap scheme while still being able to apply pressure either.
Dareus seems to be the only guy who fits the description with no question marks, but I can't see why he won't be a Cleveland Brown. In case he falls he could very well be drafted with 1A, even tough I still would believe Ingram would've been the better choice - because, right now, I see the offense as the descending unit while the defense is the ascending unit, and that's bad because Tom, who, really, is one of the (if not the one) biggest difference makers in sports. If the Patriots get rings the next 10 years, it'll be because of Brady - so give him weapons. And not Moss-like weapons, who in the end dictate too much targets and change the gameplan, but smashmouth weapons like a tough mean-streaked O-line and a All-World running back.
Other than that, I'd like to hear some suggestions from you on DEs you think fit the scheme, because I don't see that many... Just from the top of my head:
I believe Adrian Clayborn will be a better 4-3 end. I really like his energy and motor, and I don't care about his character issues, and he's from Iowa, so he could be Belichick's pick. He was on my first mock, but Ingram surpassed him based on the impact I believe each one will have on the team success'.
I don't like Allan Bailey because he's one of those college players who rely too much on his power and speed combo to be successful, and that kind of player tend to fail in the NFL.
Cameron Jordan is a name I've heard some fuzz about, but I haven't seen too much tape of him. Maybe he? I'm not easily sold on one year wonders, though.
Lawrence Guy is a guy I think has some upside, but he's not that great against the run and will most likely struggle in the point of attack while trying to cover 2 gaps. He could improve the pass rush, but IMO he couldn't ever be an every-down linemen for the Patriots.
Nick Farley has been on the rise and I was very high on Cameron Heyward and specially on Jared Crick, but 2010 hasn't been going so well to them. I think any of these two could be a nice value pick into the 2nd or 3rd round, but only if they fall and only if Belichick believes he can make any of them pull their act together.
I'd like as much as you to come from this draft with a new stud 3-4 DE to improve the D (I'm a pretty "D wins championships" guy, my 2009 mock was all-D, trust me :D ), I don't see anyone worth it in the top three rounds. Belichick will most likely go for some obscure picks into the 4th-7th rounds, IMO.

Great analysis Steve, its good to see some fresh names in this thread. I have a very similar view to you in terms of the DL. Its all about the system fit. I dont see any of the 3-4 DE in the first round as great fits for the 2-gap system. The best fit would be Dareus but even then I believe it would be a waste of his talents to put him in a 2-gap system. And he will likely be a top 5 pick so I dont see the value for him there. Im really intrigued by Nick Fairley but I havent seen enough tape of him to see if he fits the two gap 3-4. All ive seen of him are dominating highlights of him wreaking havoc in the backfield, and not playing the run or controlling gaps. So he is a big ? for me in terms of the fit. In terms for your reasoning for the Ingram pick, I love it. There are two ways of going about improving your team, filling your weaknesses and building through your strengths. We've seen in the past teams like Pittsburgh and Baltimore continually adding guys to their defence in early rounds, so why wouldnt the Pats give Brady more weapons, especially in the running game.

Right, I should say that it's nothing against Ingram he'd look great in a Patriots uniform. It's just that I'd rather have a decent RB and a stud DE or OLB than vice versa (and decent RBs are easier to find, too).

I dont see why we couldnt get both. We have the ammo to go up and get who we want. I know its not the traditional BB way, but with so many picks and no glaring holes to fill, I dont see why we wouldnt package picks to get playmakers on both sides of the ball. In the end you can only have 53 on the roster, so id prefer to go up and get a handful of top talent than another 10 or 12 players and risk another Ted Larsen situation where some talented guys cant make the roster. Of course this is all dependant on the CBA situation and the possibility of an 18 game schedule. If the season does expand to 18 games there would have to be some adjustment to the current roster/active roster system, which could affect how aggressive BB is in the 2011 draft.

My preferance would be to grab a playmaker on D with the Oakland pick, and I've stated many times that Da'Quan Bowers is 'my guy'. Then move up from the Pats pick to the top 15 and grab Ingram, hopefully without having to give up the Carolina pick. This leaves the Carolina pick for BPA (my dream would be Julio Jones falls, or the best OT available), and the mid round picks for OL and depth.
 
As this team continues to evolve ~ to EXPLODE!! ~ in front of our eyes, virtually every NEED is falling by the wayside.

We may actually end up in the RIDICULOUS position of having solid contributors at ALL positions...And a Free Hand to draft for PLEASURE...at our LEISURE. :D

That's true. I can see us entering the 2011 draft with very few or none at all needs outside of the OL.

The team obviously needs an upgrade at RB, but the thought of using a rare high pick on one makes me queasy. It's one of the most fungible positions on the field, and the Pats put together a pretty impressive decade without ever having anything like an "All-World running back." It was Clock Killin' Corey Dillon, not That Thrillin' Corey Dillon. ;)

So for me, I'll take a veteran FA and a mid-round pick at RB and look for a rare talent at DE, OLB or CB with my top pick. The way this draft is shaping up, one should be there.

I wouldn't like a CB pick with 1A at all. Bodden is coming back, and pairing him with McCourty will make a great tandem. As badly as some people hate Arrington and Butler, they sure can play nickelback decently.

And while it's true the Patriots had offensive success without All World RBs, it's hard to say Dillon was Clock Killin' and only that. In his first year, when he turned 30, he averaged 4.7 yards per carry and had over 1,600 yards with 12 touchdowns, remember? That's pretty thrilling. And those were different times - the o-line was better and more experienced, for example.
I think the biggest concern entering 2011 is protecting Brady - and the safest way to protect a QB is with a running game. Ingram will provide that. IMO he's a very rare prospect, one who will translate very well to the NFL. Sure BJGE and Woodhead are fungible, but players like Ingram aren't.

And about DE and OLB, the great ones won't be there. As well as Oakland has been playing, Quinn, Bowers and Dareus won't be there when the Patriots pick. Maybe not even Clayborn.

I agree, I would love to have Ingram on the team, but not if it costs us a chance to get one of the many solid DE or OLB candidates in this draft.

With the way Penn State is playing, we could probably get Royster in the 3rd.

Dareus is a solid 2-gap 3-4 DE for sure. I don't anyone else fitting the bill in this draft.
And about OLBs, it's hard to tell, because they played a position in college (and probably high school) but will be doing something totally different in the NFL. That's a gamble, IMO, and a bad choice to use such a high pick in one. I think it's safer to draft Ingram, who's been a RB forever - and a good one at that.

Agreed, look at how Clay Matthews absolutely harasses/terrorizes opposing QBs, that's what we need. There are plenty of RBs that we get to be gogs in the machine and will keep it running very well.

I don't see Matthews like that.
The way I see it, he's a fast guy who, when the ball gets snapped, just runs into the backfield. If the play goes his way, he'll be there. If the QB takes his time, he'll be there. While that surely impacts the football game, that's not what Belichick looks for. He wants guys who are versatile and can do anything he asks - cover, play the run, rush, spy... He didn't draft Matthews (in fact, he traded the pick to the Packers when Matthews was available) because he's not a player Belichick wants. So don't expect a 10-sacks-a-year guy from this draft. In fact, I think you'd better off betting on Akeem Ayers, who can do anything, than on Robert Quinn, who can rush and maybe do some other things - maybe being the key word.

Right, I should say that it's nothing against Ingram he'd look great in a Patriots uniform. It's just that I'd rather have a decent RB and a stud DE or OLB than vice versa (and decent RBs are easier to find, too).

Oh!, me too.
But I don't see Dareus/Bowers sliding to the Raiders' pick. I think they'll be gone. Quinn might also be gone, but if he's there it'll come down to Belichick liking him even with the character concerns (like he did with Meriweather and Hernandez) or not liking him because of the concerns (like he did with, say, Dunlap).
Anyway, I still don't like the idea of drafting a player with such a high pick to be a project, coming from 4-3 DE to 3-4 OLB. If it's the 2nd round, fine. 3rd round, fine. But 1rst seems to high for me, and maybe for Belichick.
I'd much rather get Akeem Ayers with that 1B, because he already plays LB and can do many things well (hey, maybe I'll change my mock haha).

Great analysis Steve, its good to see some fresh names in this thread. I have a very similar view to you in terms of the DL. Its all about the system fit. I dont see any of the 3-4 DE in the first round as great fits for the 2-gap system. The best fit would be Dareus but even then I believe it would be a waste of his talents to put him in a 2-gap system. And he will likely be a top 5 pick so I dont see the value for him there. Im really intrigued by Nick Fairley but I havent seen enough tape of him to see if he fits the two gap 3-4. All ive seen of him are dominating highlights of him wreaking havoc in the backfield, and not playing the run or controlling gaps. So he is a big ? for me in terms of the fit. In terms for your reasoning for the Ingram pick, I love it. There are two ways of going about improving your team, filling your weaknesses and building through your strengths. We've seen in the past teams like Pittsburgh and Baltimore continually adding guys to their defence in early rounds, so why wouldnt the Pats give Brady more weapons, especially in the running game.

Thanks for the welcome! I really enjoy reading your posts.
I agree with Dareus but I don't think he'll be there either. Cleveland will get him, that's for sure. I've also heard some good things about Fairley, but haven't seen any tape either.
Your idea of always making the offense better is very well put. I've always been a "defense first" guy, but I see two major developments making the Patriots go O-heavy in the 2011 draft:
First, the defense looks set with either good players or servicable guys. There won't be a single Ellis Hobbs in the lineup come 2011. Of course a Dareus or Bowers would help, but I don't see them winning any championships. Brady, on the other hand, is the greatest QB ever with 3 rings already. Give him weapons, protect him, develop a feared running game that will run by his side. That will win championships.
Second, the way the NFL is going. Since the days of Ty Law kicking Marvin Harrison's ass at the line of scrimmage, the NFL has been making every possible rule change to make professional football a very offense-oriented game. If the HTH 2011 rule goes down as expected, it will make it impossible to call a zone coverage scheme, or to play defense for that matter. I want an offense game then.

I dont see why we couldnt get both. We have the ammo to go up and get who we want. I know its not the traditional BB way, but with so many picks and no glaring holes to fill, I dont see why we wouldnt package picks to get playmakers on both sides of the ball. In the end you can only have 53 on the roster, so id prefer to go up and get a handful of top talent than another 10 or 12 players and risk another Ted Larsen situation where some talented guys cant make the roster. Of course this is all dependant on the CBA situation and the possibility of an 18 game schedule. If the season does expand to 18 games there would have to be some adjustment to the current roster/active roster system, which could affect how aggressive BB is in the 2011 draft.

My preferance would be to grab a playmaker on D with the Oakland pick, and I've stated many times that Da'Quan Bowers is 'my guy'. Then move up from the Pats pick to the top 15 and grab Ingram, hopefully without having to give up the Carolina pick. This leaves the Carolina pick for BPA (my dream would be Julio Jones falls, or the best OT available), and the mid round picks for OL and depth.

That 18 game schedule is a pretty interesting note, and something I didn't think about until now. Well noticed.
I also like the idea of "playmaking defensive player" with the Oakland pick, but I don't think one will be there. I'm sure your guy Bowers will be gone. He's a great prospect and is on the rise, I can see any top 10 team with a pass rushing need getting him.
I think how far Ingram will fall depends on where Miami picks. If the Patriots don't draft him, Miami will, as they need a running game and Ricky Williams is 79 years old and Ronnie Brown will be a free agent.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't like a CB pick with 1A at all. Bodden is coming back, and pairing him with McCourty will make a great tandem. As badly as some people hate Arrington and Butler, they sure can play nickelback decently.

I actually agree, it's definitely not the way I'm leaning. But I think the value proposition at the top of the draft is there for that position, so I'm not ruling it out entirely. (IMO the top CB prospects look much more elite than Ingram does.) But I hope and believe that DE & OLB will end up with good value alignments.
 
I wouldn't like a CB pick with 1A at all. Bodden is coming back, and pairing him with McCourty will make a great tandem. As badly as some people hate Arrington and Butler, they sure can play nickelback decently.

I don't see Matthews like that.

The way I see it, he's a fast guy who, when the ball gets snapped, just runs into the backfield. If the play goes his way, he'll be there. If the QB takes his time, he'll be there. While that surely impacts the football game, that's not what Belichick looks for. He wants guys who are versatile and can do anything he asks - cover, play the run, rush, spy... He didn't draft Matthews (in fact, he traded the pick to the Packers when Matthews was available) because he's not a player Belichick wants.

1 - And what if Bodden or McCourty gets injured, what kind of depth do we have?

2 - Did BB pass Matthews because of the player that he was in college or did he know what he would turn into? We know BB passed on who he was, we don't know what he would do if he had a time machine handy.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.


Patriots News 4-28, Draft Notes On Every Draft Pick
MORSE: A Closer Look at the Patriots Undrafted Free Agents
Five Thoughts on the Patriots Draft Picks: Overall, Wolf Played it Safe
2024 Patriots Undrafted Free Agents – FULL LIST
MORSE: Thoughts on Patriots Day 3 Draft Results
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots Head Coach Jerod Mayo Post-Draft Press Conference
2024 Patriots Draft Picks – FULL LIST
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots CB Marcellas Dial’s Conference Call with the New England Media
So Far, Patriots Wolf Playing It Smart Through Five Rounds
Wolf, Patriots Target Chemistry After Adding WR Baker
Back
Top