I am sure he is aware of it. And I am sure he will have a game plan to cope with it. But, I am not sure if he has the personnel to execute an all ground game.
5 OL that are at least capable run blockers
2 mountainous TEs (Brady and O'Callaghan)
1 blocking FB
1 RB (plus quicker or bigger backups as needed)
1 WR that you have to double-cover even in a hurricane
1 QB uniquely qualified to throw in wind/precipitation
What are the Pats missing?
Will the Pats rollover and die? - NO. But a very windy day against a very good team, that also has an excellent game plan could be the doom of the Patriots.
If the Pats are forced to run exclusively because of insanely high winds, what would the opposing gameplan be that would qualify as "excellent"? I suppose the winds could stop when the opposition has the ball, but I doubt God hates the Pats that much.
And even if BB had concluded that the Pats would be better off in a dome in January than at the Razor, what is he going to do, tell the team to throw the game against the Colts? That would be insane.
I agree that Belichick would not tell the Pats to lose to Indy so that they could play in the dome in January to avoid the New England weather. Roger that.
I expect that the Pats will come out with great game plans each game, but I am more worried about a high wind game then any other scenario. And the Pats are a great team, but not invincible.
Assuming the conditions are the same for both teams, I expect the Pats to be better suited (5th in run defense, 7th in run offense) to win than:
1) Indy - Outdoors? Can't pass? Puhleeze
2) Pitt - 3 points at home in the rain against the winless Fins. Nuff said.
3) SD - Seems it never rains in Southern California...
4) JAX - Florida team
5) Cleveland - 28th in run defense, 8th in run offense
6) Denver - 29th in run defense, 16th in run offense
Who is better suited to win in adverse winter conditions in Foxborough than the Pats? The Pats aren't invincible, but they certainly aren't more vulnerable on the frozen Razor field turf.