TheBostonStraggler
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- May 21, 2006
- Messages
- 6,318
- Reaction score
- 5,687
Re: Son of Adrian Peterson Severely Beaten, In Critical Condition
I think you could be right. If the case is as sickening as advertised (not established fact at this point) it's hard to see any path to redemption for this individual. However, there are those who would argue the act of attempting redemption isn't about the guilty individual. The attempt of redemption is about everyone else, about society. I don't necessarily agree or disagree with that but it does appear (not established fact) that a society's treatment of criminals has repercussions on the level of inhumanity within that society. I think societies that choose to do this are trying to say to everyone within that society, we are without exception humane. And that hard rule has the affect of deterring future inhumane acts.
Psycho-babble? Probably.
A smart man once said (paraphrasing) you can tell a lot about society from its prisons. If there are examples that show this statement is incorrect I haven't seen them yet. Which, if that is the case, means do we as a society continue eye for an eye justice even if logic dictates it increases the likelihood that future inhumane acts will occur?
Anyone capable of doing this certainly was born evil. I know this because I, like the rest of the human beings with a soul, was born incapable of being able to do such a thing.
Providing 'help' to this sociopath would simply waste the time of the caring people who would attempt unsuccessfully to help him, while they could be spending their time on people that are not human garbage and could be helped.
I think you could be right. If the case is as sickening as advertised (not established fact at this point) it's hard to see any path to redemption for this individual. However, there are those who would argue the act of attempting redemption isn't about the guilty individual. The attempt of redemption is about everyone else, about society. I don't necessarily agree or disagree with that but it does appear (not established fact) that a society's treatment of criminals has repercussions on the level of inhumanity within that society. I think societies that choose to do this are trying to say to everyone within that society, we are without exception humane. And that hard rule has the affect of deterring future inhumane acts.
Psycho-babble? Probably.
A smart man once said (paraphrasing) you can tell a lot about society from its prisons. If there are examples that show this statement is incorrect I haven't seen them yet. Which, if that is the case, means do we as a society continue eye for an eye justice even if logic dictates it increases the likelihood that future inhumane acts will occur?