I definitely think that we should let Blount go in the off season. He really didn't do anything all year. He looked pretty slow, and danced around too much. He will probably not be any faster next year. Iosefa looked to be a better power back than Blount because he doesn't dance around while looking for a hole. I wouldn't mind signing Ridley after his rehab year with the Jets. Ridley > Blount. I also think that the whole "Ridley has a fumbling problem" is extremely overblown. I'd rather have Ridley who can hit the hole fast and with Power, than Blount who stops in the backfield, and doesn't have the acceleration to get going again most times.
Lewis and White is probably a good receiving duo for next year. Always nice to have a backup.
I don't really get all the Blount hate around here. I guess because Dola started producing, it was time to pick someone new.
Blount isn't a top 5 back, I get it. And I'm not trying to pretend he's Corey Dillon. But when I read things about his dancing or not getting yards consistently, I do wonder what's going on.
Football Outsiders RB stats track something called Success Rate, which is basically a measure of how often a RB gets consistent yards to keep the offense on track to pick up a first down. It is by no means perfect, and doesn't tell whether a RB is good or bad. Just simply how often they pick up a certain number of yards depending on down and distance to keep the offense on pace. By that measure, Blount is 5th in consistency. For all the "dancing" and whatever other accusations people lob that way, he was one of the best backs in the league at getting consistent yardage.
And comparing 2014 to 2015 is tough because Blount only had 60 carries last season. I also looked at 2013 because he had a similar number of carries to this season (153) and you can see he's actually been remarkably similar in many ways. There are 3 areas where there are some big differences:
1. 20+ yard runs: he had 5 in 157 carries in 2013, 4 in 60 carries last year, 4 in 165 carries. Maybe that suggests he's lost a step. Or maybe that's just the law of averages from small sample sizes. In terms of 10+ yard runs, he had 18 in 157 (11%), 8 in 60 (13%) last year vs. 18 in 165 (11%) this year, so I think the sample sizes suggest last year was the outlier due to small number of carries.
2. The OL: Blount had 20 of his 60 runs to the left side (33%) last season, and he averaged 6.8 YPC that direction. The year before, he had 62 of his 157 carries to the left side (39%) and he averaged 6.1 YPC. This year, it was down to 30% and he's only averaging 3.1 YPC. Some of that may have to do with losing Solder, then Vollmer for a bit, then Cannon, and starting a PS 4th-option tackle in Fleming.
3. No fullback: Develin's injury may have affected Blount as well. Blount ran 24% from that formation in 2013, 33% last season, and only 12% this season. And he averaged 5.3 YPC in 2013, 3.9 YPC last season, 2.5 this season. His numbers as lone back are similar (4.6 YPC in 2013 on 97 carries, 4.9 YPC in 2014 on 28 carries vs. 4.5 YPC in 2015 on 140 carries). So the I-formation sets have been less effective overall, and that points directly to Develin's loss.
I'm not voting for Blount for the Pro Bowl or anything like that. But I think people are being overly harsh without justification. He's more or less what he's usually been, other than in some areas where we've had key injuries that have affected his production. For $2M (or half of what Vereen makes on average), I think we got our money's worth from him and I wouldn't mind seeing him come back and compete for the job again if he is willing to take a similar contract.