- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 19,502
- Reaction score
- 21,611
I believe that some CEOs deserve such compensation. If under their leadership revenues grow, brand recognition goes up, costs go down, profits increase, new markets are cultivated and shareholder value increases exponentially then you can argue it easily.
The cold hard truth is that if the owners thought he sucked, he'd be gone. Clearly they view him as providing some value. Based on the criteria above you can argue Goody is worth the $34m in pay.
The issue here is that there is a very real question as to how much value/leadership Goodell actually provides.
I feel that even within capitalism there should be a way to limit the amount one employee of a company can make over another. If your company has employees that are making X a year, then nobody else in the company should make more than Y times that amount.