I'm a joke? Put simply, yes. You've had more excuses for how poor McKnight has been then Casey Anthony did for why she didn't tell the police about her daughter..
These aren't excuses, these are facts, but you're too naive to understand that.
So he had 1 game where he had 100 yards receiving and you call that being effective? I don't call 13 receptions for 200 yards (5 for 116 in one game, 6 for 73 in another) him being more effective. Not when you look to see he's only had 20 runs for 59 yards.
Again, it's about opportunities and maturation. Woodhead has been in the league for 4-5 years and found his niche with the Pats, solid role player, does some things well, STILL DOES NOT HAVE THE UPSIDE OF MCKNIGHT, WHICH IS THE DAMN TOPIC OF THIS DISCUSSION. It's mind boggling how you still don't get it. I'm not even saying McKnight has done better than Woodhead up until this point, but that is exactly what you're arguing about.
First off, the Pats are not "dead last" in defense. They are "dead last" in terms of Yards allowed. They are 21st in terms of POINTS ALLOWED, which is the ONLY stat that truly matters on defense.
They are dead last, period. What ever you want to spin to make yourself feel better, and I guess in this case, the more important stat is "points allowed." I went to NFL.com, looked up team defensive stats, the Pats were at the bottom.
Your a fool to be ragging on the Bills and Raiders. The Bills are 3-1 and the Raiders ripped the Jets pretty damn well. In fact, that same Raider team got their arses handed to them by the Pats, allowing them only 19 points compared to the 34 they put on the Jets.
Oh goody, another personal insult.
The Bills will come down to earth, the Raiders are improved, but still have flaws that will iron itself out as the season progresses. That is my opinion, and I'm sticking with it, sorry. The Raiders also didn't rip the Jets, they won with one big run, and some trickery, and it was a horribly officiated game.
The Pats used the running game to set up the pass against the Raiders. Worked out very well for them. Were the Pats too pass happy in their 1st 3 games? Yep. But they changed that in game 4. You'd know that if you watched any of it.
Yes, I am going to throw stats at you when you are talking out your rear end.. Don't like it, then don't post.. Your choice.
Umm, no, not just the Raiders game, EVERY game, that IS the Patriot offense, Brady and the passing game. They are not an offense that runs the ball, they do it just because they need to from time to time to help offset the time of possession battle, this has been the case for the last several years if not more.
This shows you don't know sh!t about the Pats. Baltimore, San Diego, Cleveland and Green Bay, Woodhead was used more by the Pats than BJGE.
Well, I certainly don't claim to know more than you about the Pats, but to suggest Woodhead has carried the load, and then in the same sentence justify BJGE as a 1,000 yd RB, that certainly doesn't make much sense, now does it?
What makes no sense is a no-nothing JetsFan coming onto a Pats Website and thinking that he knows more about the Pats than the fans themselves. What makes no sense is that same Jets fan supporting the ridiculous claims of the Jets coach and ignoring reality. The reality that McKnight hasn't done jack to justify the claims that he's got a higher ceiling than Woodhead.
I cam to the Pats site, because the Jets are playing your Pats. The proper term is "know-nothing" not "no-nothing," and again, I never claimed I knew more than anybody, but if you're going to post BS, I'm going to call on it.
And again, as for the topic of this thread and my contribution. The REALITY is Rex thinks McKnight has a higher ceiling, and I've presented some of what I feel might be why he thinks this. Since then, all I've received is a bunch of insults and Pats fans crying and throwing stats at me, ALL OF WHICH provide NOTHING in support of the topic.
Having a higher ceiling means that McKnight will, over the course of his career, do more in the NFL than Woodhead. Sorry, but he's not shown anything to make anyone with half a brain cell or more truly believe that to be the case.