I kind of like the idea of Revis on Landry and Browner on Wallace with safety help over the top. I think that Ryan Tannehill has been consistently unable to find Wallace deep throughout the season, so I wouldn't be too worried about Browner getting beat deep since DMac has very good range as well.
I kind of like the idea of Revis on Landry and Browner on Wallace with safety help over the top. I think that Ryan Tannehill has been consistently unable to find Wallace deep throughout the season, so I wouldn't be too worried about Browner getting beat deep since DMac has very good range as well.
Yeah Tannehill really hasn't been able to get the ball deep downfield at all this season. If the secondary can do it's job and lock up Miami's receivers then the Pats will be able to beat that Miami o-line and pound Tannehill.
Browner is fine on speed guys, the difference in 40 times is so negligible in the NFL game, what isn't negligible, is the quickness/shiftiness. Wallace is a speed guy only, he isn't going to juke anyone out of their jocks or win with route running, Browner/DMC is fine on him.
Hell, i'd even go:
Revis on Landry/Hartline
Arrington + DMC on Wallace
Browner on Clay
CB#4 on Landry/Hartline whoever Revis doesn't take
This leaves Collins/Hightower free to blitz or cover the RB on every snap
I want Revis on the best route runner or the shiftiest player ever week, Browner on the bigger more physical receiver, and Arrington has handled some speed guys like Hilton recently quite well.
All that said, Miami's receiving corps is so average that our DBs might just play man on their own side and not matchup.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.