SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.bort said:But they were 12-4!
12-4!!!!
Shouldn't they be better then NE?
patsfan13 said:Didn't get to see that, too bad.
.......................PATSummerallofthe80s said:Nope...they were in a softer division than even the PATS (Houston & Tenn)
I only mention the record bc of this:
"The 2006 PATS are just like the 2002 PATS, except they are older. slower, fatter, less exciting, and shall we say the team with by far the worst record in the AFC playoffs (a mediocre 10-6) in a lousy division. KC deserved to be there instead of the PATS who threw the Miami game to avoid PIT and play a punchless Jacksonville."
Not much for reg season records
Why is it that the chiefs deserve to be there and we didnt. We had a better record. We had one of the hardest schedules in the league, if anyone really realizes that anymore..
Are people saying Denver shouldn't be here? No, just yer trolls...
The Chiefs and PATS had the same record. The Chiefs beat you.
I never played the Chiefs
PATSummerallofthe80s said:Nope...they were in a softer division than even the PATS (Houston & Tenn)
Why is it that the chiefs deserve to be there and we didnt. We had a better record. We had one of the hardest schedules in the league, if anyone really realizes that anymore..
The Chiefs and PATS had the same record. The Chiefs beat you.
skri65 said:We had a tougher schedule and I'm not counting our loss to miami in the final week as a loss considering we nearly beat them with our 3rd stringers out there.