BadMoFo
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2007
- Messages
- 7,670
- Reaction score
- 3,648
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Joe Flacco and Matt Ryan are two exceptions to the rule.
I know people complain about Cassel not being able to throw deep to Moss, but would O'Connell be any better?
I know O'Connell can run and seems to have more confidence than Cassel behind center, but I know nothing about his accuracy or arm strength.
I don't have to deal with anything, it's clear to me and apparently clear to guys like Mike Reiss and from other accounts people in the FO that Kevin O'Connell is actually the guy and it really is just a matter of time.
Speaking of the SD game. What do you honestly think Matt Cassel is going to do when he trots into Qualcomm or Lucas Oil Stadium ? Two teams that want to annihilate us for past endeavers. I'll tell you right now what he's going to do, he's going to crap his pants, those games are going to be freakin ugly, tellin you right now.
LOL Just like it was clear to you and guys like Mike reiss and from all other accounts people in the FO that Gutierrez had passed Cassel on the depth chart during camp...
The SD game could be ugly, has even been that way with Brady too... Remember how Troy Brown had to save Tommy's ass by forcing a fumble after a throw from Tom to him was picked on a play that would have sealed our doom in a playoff game...Nah, you guys have selective memory disorder...Meanwhile the Colts have yet to win in the Lubradome and may be crapping their own pants as Peyton Manning checks in as the 23rd ranked QB in the league while some stiff who hadn't played since HS remains a respectble 17th ranked after a week in which his defense fell for the same college play 5 freakin' times in the same game...
According to NFL.com, his arm strength rivals Joe Flacco's. It's hard to talk about accuracy, because his receivers weren't particularly good, and his OL was a disaster. That said, his preseason TD pass to the back of the EZ was close to perfect, so good accuracy is at least a possibility. .
Exactly, and that pass was to our good friend Chad Jackson. Actually what people commented on was the fact that Kevin had the brains and wherewithall to take it upon himself to check off out of the originally called play and take advantage of Chad Jackson with single coverage and the safeties rolled to the right. He read the defense, checked out back to Jackson and threw a beautiful deep fade spiral to Jackson for 6. The ball had tremendous touch and accuracy on it.
More stupid people blaming the quarterback for a loss that certainly wasn't his fault. Cassel is a decent QB who will be getting better over time. There is no evidence at all that O'Connell is better than Cassel in a real NFL game against real starters. If he was, he would be starting.
Oh, but I forget that the geniuses of patsfans.com are more aware of player talent than the coaching staff themselves. Never mind that they watch and speak to these guys every day. If this board actually got together and tried to run the Pats personnel management, they'd lose every game.
Hey guys, let's place the weight of all our decisions on emotion instead of logic! Let's do what feels right, instead of what is right.
Cassel's completion rate through his first three starts since high school: 66.7%. Yards per attempt: 6.22. Touchdowns: 2. Interceptions: 1. QB Rating: 87.0. Record: 2-1. And you're calling for his head? Because of ONE loss, in which the defense couldn't stop anyone? And it's Cassel's fault that the D failed? What the ****?
Get a grip.
17,19 & 13 those are the only stats that matter! Whats worse is we started almost at mid field every drive against the Jets thanks to great ST play.
QB rating & completion % are the most over rated stats in the NFL. All those short completions dont mean jack when you cant finish drives with points.
This is the same Miami D we absolutely TORCHED last year ( minus Jason Taylor ) I don't know why you Cassel apologists have the bar set so low that averaging 16 points per game against the worst defenses in the league is doing well.
Atlanta scored 38 against the Chiefs last week!
I did not "conveniently" leave out those points. I left them out because they are irrelevant. Wow, one lost fumble in three games? Big deal. That's less than Carson Palmer and the same as Tony Romo. It means nothing. And what the hell is a "legitimately dropped" interception? Last time I checked, those don't count.You conveniently forgot to mention a few things:
3 legitmately dropped interceptions (2 of which bounced miraculously into the hands of our WRs and Kevin Faulk)
1 lost fumble
17ppg against what have to be 2 of the 5 worst defenses in football and 7 of those points were courtesy of an Ellis Hobbs 80 yard return
You have no idea what you're talking about. QB rating and completion rates are absolutely important in determining the quality of an NFL quarterback. How many poor quarterbacks in the NFL have high quarterback ratings? Oh, that's right. None.17,19 & 13 those are the only stats that matter! Whats worse is we started almost at mid field every drive against the Jets thanks to great ST play.
QB rating & completion % are the most over rated stats in the NFL. All those short completions dont mean jack when you cant finish drives with points.
This is the same Miami D we absolutely TORCHED last year ( minus Jason Taylor ) I don't know why you Cassel apologists have the bar set so low that averaging 16 points per game against the worst defenses in the league is doing well.
Atlanta scored 38 against the Chiefs last week!
Total lack? Did you miss the KC game then.You're right - but I think the bad OL play is largely because Cassel hasn't gone downfield since the pass to Moss from the 1 vs. KC. A long pass for him is 10 yards - of course teams can start blitzing and abusing the OL with no fear. Not saying it would be different with O'Connell and none of us know if Cassel is choosing to go short or if he's been told to - but the total lack of a downfield game makes it very hard on the OL.
I don't think so. Show me a lot of posts by these lot of posters and I'll admit you are right, but until then you are making this up.A lot of posters on here had some kind of dillusions that Cassel could step right in and make us forget we were missing the best QB in the game.
As much as I want to see Cassel do well and win games, I would like to see Gutierrez given a chance just to see how he reacts to in-game situations. Brady had only a season of experience under his belt when he stepped into the breach.
I'm not saying he should start the next game, but I would like to see him get 10 minutes - a quarter.
His passes haven't been short completions at all--in fact, averaging 6.6 yards per attempt is barely lower than the 6.9 that Brady averaged last year. Oh, but I forget that facts don't matter to the ignorant.
What matters is winning. I don't give two ****s if we win by 3, by 10, or by 20, and neither should you--does it matter that our three superbowl wins were all by a margin of three points? No. Defense has always been the strength of this team, and will continue to be for the remainder of the season.
This doesn't make sense to me... why?
Why? Because then we'll have a more accurate idea of if we do need to bring an experienced QB in if Cassel begins to seriously struggle this year, and whether Gutierrez can back up Brady better than Cassel can.
I said yesterday that the season was over for me the minute Tommy went down, so IMO, it wouldn't hurt to have a look at Gutierrez.