loosebearing
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 381
- Reaction score
- 123
As are the Bengals, Panthers and Seahawks.
There you go - he has to be better than Branch
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.As are the Bengals, Panthers and Seahawks.
It pushes my two guys (Aiken, CJ Jones) one step up the ladder!
I believe Washington was running with the 1st team on thursday (correct me if I'm wrong, pats1!) in Welker's role.
There you go - he has to be better than Branch
Branch is PUP'd and out till at least Week 6.
You are correct.
Washington is this team's #4 receiver, finally. It only took him a year and half. He signed last offseason expecting to be about the #4 receiver (he was an offensely-minded player in Cincy), but the Moss trade threw a wrench into those plans.
Of course, I got blasted recently for suggesting that Washington would be the #4 receiver and Jackson would be cut.
Branch is PUP'd and out till at least Week 6.
Incorrect. Branch was on active/PUP but is now on the active roster. He never went to Reserve/PUP.
Incorrect. Branch was on active/PUP but is now on the active roster. He never went to Reserve/PUP.
I don't want to derail this thread, but did anyone else notice how, about a half hour after Reiss' report, SMY cited it in her report, but about 15 minutes after that, Tomase cited his own "league source" and failed to mention Reiss?
I don't think so. Branch played 14 and 11 games the last two years, total of 25 gamesThat's what I said
Branch has missed even more games for Seattle than Chad has missed in NE. (Close though) And he is cheaper
I don't want to derail this thread, but did anyone else notice how, about a half hour after Reiss' report, SMY cited it in her report, but about 15 minutes after that, Tomase cited his own "league source" and failed to mention Reiss?
Great, this board's two favorite subjects: Chad Jackson and John Thomase, all rolled into one thread!
Interesting.
I just think he was never properly taught how to run routes.
Why does he have to mention Reiss.
Is it not possible he has a source that told him too.
Damn what the hell am I doing I can't believe I defended ThomASSe