Sure, my roots are German, but I'd prefer English.
It's a German dessert, goes well with a can of whoopass.
Last edited:
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Sure, my roots are German, but I'd prefer English.
The bottom line to all this is Brady. When you face a QB like Brady or Manning, it changes the dynamic of a defense. Anything your defense did against any other team doesn't count.
looks like a lot of correlation in those games you mentioned.
margin of victory:
21 on cowboys
21 on browns
21 on bengals
24 on chargers
I think the points are where they are because they feel pretty safe with a 3 TD lead.
if you still think your negative correlation holds up, doing an analysis on the run/pass ratio after the pats are up 2/3 TD's. i bet they run it more, therefore nullifying your "negative correlation"
Guys guys guys, i doubt belogical is saying we will completley shut you guys down. I am sure his point, is the same or similar to mine, our defense is the best you have seen so far this year, and we simply hope to slow you guys down enough to make it into a real football game. It is up to our offense to put some numbers on the board.
Thank you, Professor.
Guys guys guys, i doubt belogical is saying we will completley shut you guys down. I am sure his point, is the same or similar to mine, our defense is the best you have seen so far this year, and we simply hope to slow you guys down enough to make it into a real football game. It is up to our offense to put some numbers on the board.
welcome!!!!
How does that prove your point? Wouldn't that mean the Pats could score plenty more points? I certainly know that's the case against the Chargers, when the Pats went on multiple 8+ minute drives (one being ten minutes)? If they wanted to they could have put up 45 easily.
your serious, right?
yes, the pats could have scored more points, therefore nullifying his negative correlation! 34 against the browns doesn't matter, they could have scored 60!
I think the bigger question is what are the Redskins going to do against the 4th ranked defense in the league?
Rank Team G Pts/G TotPts Scrm Plys Yds/G Yds/P
4 NEP 7 17.1 120 393 274.9 4.9
5 Washington 6 14.7 88 383 276.8 4.3
I haven't followed the Skins much. Does Greg Williams still run that quasi 4-6 defense that he ran with the Bills?
I think the bigger question is what are the Redskins going to do against the 4th ranked defense in the league?
Rank Team G Pts/G TotPts Scrm Plys Yds/G Yds/P
4 NEP 7 17.1 120 393 274.9 4.9
5 Washington 6 14.7 88 383 276.8 4.3
yeah, same D.
hmmmmmm? Fred Smoot? Why does that name sound familiar?
Oh yeah, that was the guy that couldn't cover Reche Caldwell last year when we beat the Vikings. Got beat deep twice and allowed a TD . Perhaps he'll have better luck against our NEW receivers :singing:
I'd hope, for your sake, you're not depending on him to save the day. His record against Brady ain't so hot. Never been impressed with Smoot, he bites on play-action like a two year old defending a toy.
yeah, same D.
They did well against us.How'd Gregg fair with that D in Buffalo. Anyone remember how his teams did against us
You do realize we have Moss, right?