You had to put your D back on the field anyway after the score..... The situation itself is rare enough. And while I certainly cant recall any team going the route the Pats chose I do remember the Saints kneeling the ball 4 times last year up big on Dallas inside the 5 with almost a minute to play on a Sunday night. Dallas, obviously out of respect, chose to kneel the ball and the end game since the game was over anyway.
Ahem... http://scoreboards.aol.com/football/nfl/game/48097/play_by_play.aspx
The Saints were up by 25. The Patriots were up by 14. Despite what you may think, 14 points is not an insurmountable lead, even with 22 seconds left in the game. Why even take the chance of losing a lead late in the game because "you're supposed to be nice"? It's stupid to point at a game where the victor was leading by four scores with one minute to play and act as if it proves your point, because it doesn't.
He Ban Me said:Stated this before, but here are some facts:
*In 2004, PM had 7 4th Quarter TD's. Brady has 5 to date.
*Of those 7 TD's, 6 came with either the Colts TIED or LOSING the game
*In the ONE game where PM threw a 4th QTR TD, with 12:56 to play, Colts were up 20. In the first half, Tennessee was up 24-17 at one point.
*PM threw THREE TD passes his last three games in '04.
*PM played 3 downs in the last game of the season, and did not throw a TD on any one of those 3 downs he played.
What are you attempting to prove? That his year was better? Because no Pats fan is going to say that. If throwing a TD is your best bet to win the game, throw the TD. As has been said, no lead is safe in this league.
And if your stance is that he was just tacking on at the end of the game, you're mistaken.