- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,091
- Reaction score
- 22,701
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The last play by the Steelers on Mason of the Ravens. THAT was PI. Real PI. Not called. The inverse of the Pollian phantom PI calls.
No kidding. One isolated incident has turned into "Brady and the Pats get every flag." Even though the stats say otherwise, we apparently lead the league in getting roughing the passer calls, otherwise they're just talking out of their asses and I know they'd never do that, would they?
Wouldn't that be illegal to show on tv ?
Eisen is just jealous because he can't get a good look at Brady in the showers.
Manning got some ticky tack roughing the passer calls as well. i.e. When he was hit as he released the ball.
Do you guys think guys like Brady and Manning don't get favorable calls?
Do you think that #23 for the Bulls didn't get favorable calls? Lebron now?
Do you not think Roger Clemens gets more of the corners then most pitchers?
It happens, there is that earned respect. I didn't see the hit in question so I can't comment on that. However I can comment on the fact that You all would be loving it if he said 18 and not 12 even though in this argument they are interchangable.
just saw highlight where campbell was slammed to the ground and no penalty.Eisen chimed in, "if its 12 of new england then thats a fresh set of downs". The damn balt game has really gotten to the media .They dont seem to see the PI calls in indy
People have already forgotten the hit that took McNabb out earlier this season. I think a more important issue isn't whether Brady's getting calls or Manning's getting calls but, rather, whether or not there's a more generalized double standard for quarterbacks that are considered more mobile.
Of course, Whitlock will be claiming it's a black thing....
I don't ever watch these shows but i hear about them. So i'd like to hear #18 Manning instead of #12 Brady be insurted when these commentators comment.Is he wrong? I mean, superstars do get more calls than JAGs.
I don't ever watch these shows but i hear about them. So i'd like to hear #18 Manning instead of #12 Brady be insurted when these commentators comment.
That could be true PJ, but somehow i doubt it. As i'm sure you know Manning is part of football royalty, Archie's son, the name mustn't be besmurched.I don't watch them much either. Maybe Manning is intoned sometimes but no one here complains about it.
That could be true PJ, but somehow i doubt it. As i'm sure you know Manning is part of football royalty, Archie's son, the name mustn't be besmurched.
That beer picture is making me thirsty. For milk.
By the Jug full.......That beer picture is making me thirsty. For milk.
Neither of us have a chance at the milk. We'd better settle for the beer
Hey, speak for yourself. She wants me.
She doesnt like married men. However, i hear she likes poor single guys, so im in
Actually i prefer that girl with the kegs attached to her melons. You've probably seen the pic im talking about in the 'ladies lounge'
There was a blow to head which was a legit call, except that when a Ravens lineman landed a similar hit on Brady, everyone acted like it was a rule made up on the spot to save Brady and flood the league with estrogen.
The roughing call after the Cushing INT was more puzzling (you can see it from a few different angles, but the best view is around the 38 second mark). The QB was tackled while throwing the ball. No blow to the head, no dive at the knees, no leading with the crown of the helmet, the defender didn't arrive after the ball was released. Instead of having the ball at the 10 or 11, the Texans started at the 25/6.
The larger point is that high profile QBs have gotten these type of calls for decades. That could have been Montana, Marino, Young, Favre, Elway, etc., drawing that penalty. Why start a campaign that this is special treatment reserved just for Brady? Can it really be that this is just an "easy sell" to the majority of the audience? I'm obviously not in the business, but that doesn't seem like enough motivation.
People have already forgotten the hit that took McNabb out earlier this season. I think a more important issue isn't whether Brady's getting calls or Manning's getting calls but, rather, whether or not there's a more generalized double standard for quarterbacks that are considered more mobile.
Of course, Whitlock will be claiming it's a black thing....