- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 22,901
- Reaction score
- 15,762
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No to Harvin but this thread got me thinking of what BB is going to do about our KR situation, we desperately need an upgrade there. Did we have a single KR past midfield last year?
But heres' the rub about Harvin's 58% snap count. How are you going to get Harvin consistently on the field when the Pats mostly play double tight end sets to take advantage of Gronk and Hernandez? Lloyd and Welker are already locked in as our two top wideouts.
Furthermore Harvin mainly plays a slot role, same as Welker, although he does have more speed and has KR ability, which is something we do need. But how do you get him on the field enough to satisfy him, considering playing time is one of his main complaints?
And last but not least, it's all about the money. Even if PH was available for only a '2nd round pick' (which is pure speculation btw, it might cost more), how can you afford to pay Harvin and Welker, and then later resign Hernandez too? If Harvin is looking for an 8m+ deal, I don't see it very likely that he will get it from the Pats. Which means that basically we are giving up a 2nd rounder or more for a 2 year holdout rental?
No to Harvin but this thread got me thinking of what BB is going to do about our KR situation, we desperately need an upgrade there. Did we have a single KR past midfield last year?
But heres' the rub about Harvin's 58% snap count. How are you going to get Harvin consistently on the field when the Pats mostly play double tight end sets to take advantage of Gronk and Hernandez? Lloyd and Welker are already locked in as our two top wideouts.
Furthermore Harvin mainly plays a slot role, same as Welker, although he does have more speed and has KR ability, which is something we do need. But how do you get him on the field enough to satisfy him, considering playing time is one of his main complaints?
And last but not least, it's all about the money. Even if PH was available for only a '2nd round pick' (which is pure speculation btw, it might cost more), how can you afford to pay Harvin and Welker, and then later resign Hernandez too? If Harvin is looking for an 8m+ deal, I don't see it very likely that he will get it from the Pats. Which means that basically we are giving up a 2nd rounder or more for a 2 year rental?
Harvin would be used to replace Welker. In theory he would be a faster Welker, who can also be a deep threat, running back, and elite kick returner.
True that, and in theory Ochocinco would have been an All Pro once working with Brady and Haynesworth All World once being utilized properly. Little did we know that utilizing Big AL properly really meant handing him a knife and fork.
Was BB stupid for hiring Brandon Lloyd? I mean, in theory he's supposed to help out the offense but he might just be another in a long line of WR free agent busts?
Harvin's abilities could provide a very nice boost to our offense capabilities, not something to be taken lightly.
Was BB stupid for hiring Brandon Lloyd? I mean, in theory he's supposed to help out the offense but he might just be another in a long line of WR free agent busts?
Harvin's abilities could provide a very nice boost to our offense capabilities, not something to be taken lightly.
Trade Ninkovich, Edelman, a 3rd and a 7th for Harvin.
Harvin's abilities could provide a very nice boost to our offense capabilities, not something to be taken lightly.
Harvin is not going anywhere...including NE.
Harvin seems to be pissed off and is making these statements,but the Vikings have NO plans on trading him,they need Harvin to keep this team from being a one dimentional team and killing Peterson with overuse when he returns.
There is no player in football who the Patriots could get in trade for Welker who would produce more than he has, so the idea he would be a "boost" is foolish.
i dont think bill cares about kickoffs due to the fact the nfl reduced the importance of them. thats why slater always tells them to stay in the end zone cause he doesnt want them hurt
First off, I never endorsed any particular trade involving Welker. Next, how do you know Harvin woudnt outproduce Welker?...
We don't know that a 3 month old infant wouldn't outproduce Welker. You can't possibly know unless you actually perform the 'experiment' under the required conditions.
However, we do know that what Welker has done had never been done before. Welker has 4 100 catch seasons (would likely have been 5 without the ACL injury, but what is, is), and 2 120 catch seasons. If it hasn't been done before despite there being literally thousands of people who had the opportunity to do it, it's usually (admittedly not always) because it's a difficult thing to do. The odds are that Harvin would not be able to match Welker, let alone beat him.
One other thing to think about: Harvin is presumably demanding a trade because he wants a new contract. If you trade for him then you have to give him a new deal. How is that going to sit with players currently on the team that have not been extended yet, like Hernandez, Vollmer, Chung and Spikes?