Buchanty
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 637
- Reaction score
- 286
I went back to review the tape on the game after all the noise about running up the score and I came up with the following observations:
Brady only had two possessions in the second half and began the last one with 2:02 remaining on the 3rd quarter clock. If he hadn't started that drive he would have gone to the bench after slightly less than 2 and a half quarters. In my mind that is taking it too lightly before the game of the season next week. So if you bring him in for only his second possession, I assume that most fans will accept its ok for him to finish it.
Now for the interesting part - I suspect that the whole drive was an exercise in how to execute without Brady (TE) blocking with the OL. The reason I say this is because the drive is incredibly balanced in terms of who participates and play calling. It went as follows:
Evans 3 yd Rush
Moss 6 yd Pass (left)
Maroney 4 yd Rush
Rivers incomplete (drop)
Gaffney 21 yd pass (called back due to Offense PI on Welker)
Welker 11 yd pass (left/slot)
Stalworth 14 yd pass (left)
Evans 10 yd rush
Moss 35 yd pass (right)
Evans 7 yd rush (left)
Stalworth incomplete pass in the EZ (5th target)
False Start Koppen
Faulk 8 yd rush (right)
Brady 3 yd rush (middle)
False Start Moss
Faulk 8yd rush (middle)
Welker 2 yd pass - TOUCHDOWN
8 passes (2 incs and 1 called back by penalty)
7 rushes
more amazingly each one of the starters (other than Maroney) got 2 shots at the ball (Heath got Maroneys extra) and one each for Gaffney and Rivers (dont think he will be with us long).
It is almost too mathematical - and I suspect as much an exercise in execution as one in team participation.
I was just wondering if this was to simulate life with an injured Brady (TE) or life with Brady (TE) tied up with Freeney and Mathis.
I just dont see any of this as running up the score, and certainly nothing that disrepects Gibbs or the Redskins as they used everybody rather than exploiting mismatches.
footnote: it was a shame about Gaffney's catch as it was nicely executed, but I just couldnt see where Welker caused the PI, partly because he was just out of camera angle for a millisecond. However I didnt see he or the nearest defender acting as if there was contact. Anyone out there with a better view?
Brady only had two possessions in the second half and began the last one with 2:02 remaining on the 3rd quarter clock. If he hadn't started that drive he would have gone to the bench after slightly less than 2 and a half quarters. In my mind that is taking it too lightly before the game of the season next week. So if you bring him in for only his second possession, I assume that most fans will accept its ok for him to finish it.
Now for the interesting part - I suspect that the whole drive was an exercise in how to execute without Brady (TE) blocking with the OL. The reason I say this is because the drive is incredibly balanced in terms of who participates and play calling. It went as follows:
Evans 3 yd Rush
Moss 6 yd Pass (left)
Maroney 4 yd Rush
Rivers incomplete (drop)
Gaffney 21 yd pass (called back due to Offense PI on Welker)
Welker 11 yd pass (left/slot)
Stalworth 14 yd pass (left)
Evans 10 yd rush
Moss 35 yd pass (right)
Evans 7 yd rush (left)
Stalworth incomplete pass in the EZ (5th target)
False Start Koppen
Faulk 8 yd rush (right)
Brady 3 yd rush (middle)
False Start Moss
Faulk 8yd rush (middle)
Welker 2 yd pass - TOUCHDOWN
8 passes (2 incs and 1 called back by penalty)
7 rushes
more amazingly each one of the starters (other than Maroney) got 2 shots at the ball (Heath got Maroneys extra) and one each for Gaffney and Rivers (dont think he will be with us long).
It is almost too mathematical - and I suspect as much an exercise in execution as one in team participation.
I was just wondering if this was to simulate life with an injured Brady (TE) or life with Brady (TE) tied up with Freeney and Mathis.
I just dont see any of this as running up the score, and certainly nothing that disrepects Gibbs or the Redskins as they used everybody rather than exploiting mismatches.
footnote: it was a shame about Gaffney's catch as it was nicely executed, but I just couldnt see where Welker caused the PI, partly because he was just out of camera angle for a millisecond. However I didnt see he or the nearest defender acting as if there was contact. Anyone out there with a better view?