lobster
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2004
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.RAWKY said:Too top it off, unless i am misreading these post which may very well be as they are not all in sequence, it is appears to be a CBA Union lawyer who is making this threat to sue.
SBPatsFan said:I believe Kessler, and the firm he is a partner in, serve as outside council for the NFLPA. The NFLPA (union) also has its own legal team team but they bring in outside counsil for many cases. Kessler in past instances seems to frequenctly act as the face and voice to the media.
He was part of legal representation in the following CBA/NFL contract arbitration cases and made similar types of comments to the press.
Belichick v. NFL (lost)
Arbitration ruling that resulted in Ricky Williams having to repay the Miami Dolphins $8.6 million (lost)
Arrington vs. Redskins over his missing signing bonus (lost)
He has been involved in other arbitration cases on NFL matters as well over the past 6 or so years; several of which at least were settled before arbitration was completed. He has won pretty big cases in other areas as well. Based on the examples with cba/nfl contract cases going to arbitration, his record seems unspectacular.
PatsFanSince74 said:OK, I'm not a lawyer, but I understand that there's a Napoleonic Legal Code and an Anglo-American Legal Code. What is suggested above would be, to use the technical legal terminology, "Whacko," under either.
So, I can only conclude that Deion is breaking new legal ground here. What should we call it? The "Branch-Deionian Code?"
Patsfanin Philly said:Though I think the outcome may be more like Branch-Davidian..
with his career going up in flames courtesy of an overly inflated view of self-importance fueled by a wannabe agent who has yet to learn that when dealing with the Pats ( and many others) it's best to keep a low profile (out of the media). As the adage goes, 'you catch more flies with honey than vinegar'.
From Felger's article..
" Kessler said he doesn’t know if the Pats have continued to negotiate on compensation with the Jets and Seahawks. He said Branch has no intention to return to the Pats until the dispute is settled."
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but under the CBA if he sits out this whole year ,he loses the year of service and STILL owes the Pats a fifth year.....
Chayut goes from a brand new, nobody agent that has a funny name to a rebel agent who isn't afraid to fight the good fight against the biggest of establishments (the NFL) without fear. And he gets to do all this while repping a SB MVP client. Chayut's name is splattered in the media every day. People are starting to tune in to see what this guy's got next. This is publicity that costs mega dollars (if you can even get it) and this guy is getting it no problem just by doing agent business. The other agents are probably jealous of all the notoriety the new kid Chayut is getting. This is a brilliant way to kick start his career. With a bang!emoney_33 said:You called what this guy is doing brilliant. Yet, in this post you are saying he is doing exactly what a baby does when they can't get what they want... cry and cry and cry until the parent gives in... brillliant!
Bobs My Uncle said:Chayut goes from a brand new, nobody agent that has a funny name to a rebel agent who isn't afraid to fight the good fight against the biggest of establishments without fear. And he gets to do all this while repping a SB MVP client. Chayut's name is splattered in the media every day. People are starting to tune in to see what this guy's got next. This is publicity that costs mega dollars (if you can even get it) and this guy is getting it no problem just by doing agent business. The other agents are probably jealous of all the notoriety the new kid Chayut is getting. This is a brilliant way to kick start his career. With a bang!
It does seem like those who whine most get what they want because most everyone wants to shut off (down) the whiners.SteveKiner said:I think BMU has this nailed. Branch, through Chayut, is just going to keep doing things to be such a pain in the arse that he finally gets out of New England. Team Branch has their toadies in the media with their agendas, the NFLPA with their agenda, Chayut with his agenda all trying to get Branch out of town. I thought it was a great move when the Pats allowed Branch to try to work out a deal with other teams. In hindsight, it opened up a new avenue for team Branch to try to exploit. I think everyone (except toadies like RBorges) agrees that the Patriots have acted professionally and with class all the way through this ordeal, and actually bent over backwards to help facilitate a compromise. That bending over may come back to bite them. The Patriots have the law, the facts, and most public opinion on their side. Team Branch has the ability to whine, complain, irritate and be a distraction on their side. In the Pats favor, I don't see BB giving in. However, like BMU has stated, the league might jump in and coerce the Pats to bring this to a conclusion. The league wants to start off a brand new year without crap like this floating over their heads. If, for instance, the league stepped in and forced the Jets to pay what the Pats demand in compensation in return for being allowed to pay Branch his 39/6 contract, doesn't Team Branch still win? They don't care about the damage to the league. They don't care that the Pats got "fair" compensation. They don't care if it hurts the Jets. All they care is that they got out of the contract that was "forced" on them by the evil Patriots and they got lots of green. If the Patriots hadn't let Branch "shop around", Team Branch probably still would have pulled some crap. (you know they weren't just going to sit home quietly while the meter was running), but letting Branch "shop" might end up costing the Pats dearly. Whenever you let a judge, jury or arbiter, decide something, it is never a slam dunk. Remember OJ, McDonalds hot coffee, the Terry Glenn suspension, and TO was going to win his case before the 2 sides compromised. Hopefully, logic and common sense win out and Team Branch is laughed out of court, but I wouldn't count on it. The NFL might not either and might "nudge" the Pats toward some solution. If Branch gets out of town, or even if he stays in NE, and signs some contract for more than he had coming to him, Team Branch must consider it a victory. Time will tell if it was worth the cost.
Perhaps but it's obvious the Chayut team is banking on the alternative this time around believing that bad PR can sometimes be very good PR.Patsfanin Philly said:People also slow down for a car wreck but it doesn't mean that they'd want to be in their shoes. Did he get publicity? Absolutely but then again so did John Mark Karr and not the kind you'd expect or want . If you get too close to the bang, it blows up in your face and I have a feeling that this may fall into the 'be careful what you wish for, Mr. Chayut ' category..
Just my $0.02,
Ahriman said:With this bit of info, if true, my stance has changed on Deion and his situation.
I've been pretty adamant that Deion is the one who is to be held responsible because his agent works for him. However, there seems to be something underhanded going on here. I recall some news getting out a couple of days ago where the Jets got in on the Branch talks as per Chayut's request, or as a favor to him. Now Chayut is advising that they sue the Patriots for the difference in Branch's current salary with the one the Jets supposedly offered?
I'm not one for conspiracies here, but something doesn't smell right. Either Deion is really a spiteful person or this agent is up to something ugly.
Logic would dictate that Chayut would strongly believe that the Pats wouldn't want to pay a top 5 WR salary for a disgruntled player who'll more than likely be a cancer to the team if he's forced to stick around. Frankly, given BB's MO for playing the guys who only want to be there, I'm not so BB would want a disgruntled Deion around. Especially such an expensive Deion.NE39 said:The problem with Chayut's strategy is it only works if the Pats trade him. Otherwise, he sits out and loses $1M this year, and is right back in the same position next year if the Pats decide to franchise him.
But Terry Glenn did get delt away. Getting Branch delt away is what Chayut wants to happen. And, apparently, he'll cause a ruckus until it happens.NE39 said:He can make all the noise he wants, it only works if the Pats cave. Terry Glenn tried to shoot his way out of town before TO. He D-I-D try pretty hard, making a lot of noise. Belichick sat on him through the season, winning the Super Bowl despite the "distraction". The following offseason Glenn was dealt for picks, losing out on a healthy chunk of his pro-rated signing bonus.
Again, a trade of Branch is what Chayut wants to happen. I'm sure he'd prefer for it to happen this year rather than next year but if it's next year it's no different than if Branch played out his contract in the first place.NE39 said:Unless he wins his greivance, Branch has no leverage left. He can hold out all he wants, but he will lose all the money he was going to make this year and he will still be subject to the franchise tag after it. Belichick didn't give in to Glenn, and he will probably follow the same model with Branch. He'll sit on him until he comes back late in the season, franchise him in the offseason and then deal him for draft picks.
The new guy Chayut is now a household agent name as a result of his actions. You can't buy such publicity.NE39 said:Doesn't sound "brilliant" to me.
I would assume that this would only be the case if the team in question gave the player permission to seek out a trading partner but then didn't act in good faith when that player returned a contract offer for their consideration.TheBostonStraggler said:Seriously, if Team Branch prevails, doesn't it set up the next guy who is DB's position to do the same thing??
Bobs My Uncle said:Chayut goes from a brand new, nobody agent that has a funny name to a rebel agent who isn't afraid to fight the good fight against the biggest of establishments (the NFL) without fear. And he gets to do all this while repping a SB MVP client. Chayut's name is splattered in the media every day. People are starting to tune in to see what this guy's got next. This is publicity that costs mega dollars (if you can even get it) and this guy is getting it no problem just by doing agent business. The other agents are probably jealous of all the notoriety the new kid Chayut is getting. This is a brilliant way to kick start his career. With a bang!
Bobs My Uncle said:I would assume that this would only be the case if the team in question gave the player permission to seek out a trading partner but then didn't act in good faith when that player returned a contract offer for their consideration.
I would think that the team could squash any potential liability simply by not agreeing to allow the player to source out a trading partner while under contract, or, if allowed, have written documentation which spells out specifically the exact terms of the compensation that the team is seeking.
PonyExpress said:Branch's clusterfudge goes national: http://www.profootballtalk.com/rumormill.htm
TheBostonStraggler said:TO was big news. Branch, outside of New England or an article here and there, is not making the back page snippet.