Welcome to PatsFans.com

My hopes for a reasonable, cheap WR corps

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Digger44, Mar 15, 2006.

  1. Digger44

    Digger44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

    1. Branch
    2. Moulds
    3. Keyshawn
    4. Patten
    5. Childress

    I would be pretty happy with this group.
  2. stevedogc

    stevedogc Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Here's mine:

    1. Branch
    2. Moulds (Price is Moulds does not get released or is asking to much $)
    3. Gaffney
    4. Az-Zahir Hakim
    5. Mike Hass (draft)



    Last edited: Mar 15, 2006
  3. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,341
    Likes Received:
    121
    Ratings:
    +253 / 8 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    I would be very happy with it but I'm not sure how cheap Moulds and KJ will be.
  4. sieglo

    sieglo Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    4,242
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    You guys are crazy. No way we could afford any of those groups.
  5. mtbykr

    mtbykr Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    2,999
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

  6. SeanBruschi54

    SeanBruschi54 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,476
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +19 / 0 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    No offense but that would be the worst WR corps in years. Branch and moulds are great.

    Gaffney cant get open
    Hakin annually leads the league in drops
    Hass will be a rookie that no one should expect big time production from.
  7. Boston Boxer

    Boston Boxer U.S. Air Force Retired PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,433
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +16 / 3 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    I would be very happy with that group.
  8. SeanBruschi54

    SeanBruschi54 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,476
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +19 / 0 / -1

    #24 Jersey

    Great and after the season 2-4 can all retire.
  9. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,341
    Likes Received:
    121
    Ratings:
    +253 / 8 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    Right now I think we'll let 2007 worry about itself, we have enough WR for 2006 to worry about :)
  10. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,389
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +211 / 14 / -2

    Sure, this group is fine. I would expect a draftee to be #5, and Childress to be #6. Thsi group also would be quite reasonable in price (presuming no extension by Branch).

  11. Digger44

    Digger44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    that is my thinking
  12. Pats726

    Pats726 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    OK we agree on Branch....and Childress but no way will they get those 3...lucky to get one of them..I think someone like a ZSmith or a Childress will return kicks..a Troy Brown and a rookie..or 2 rookies...MAYBE a Pattenanad a KJ...but no way all 3. WOn't happen..a nice thought but???
  13. ClosingTime

    ClosingTime Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Why don't you add T.O. to the Keyshawn, Az-Hakim and Moulds pickups. That would be a REALLY reasonable and cheap group.
  14. Box_O_Rocks

    Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    1. Branch
    2. Klecko
    3. Brown
    4. Childress
    5. Draft

    In Belichick I Trust (I just know he had Klecko sitting last season while he was making a position change.)
  15. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,852
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +46 / 2 / -0

    Any of them would be better than last year's top 5

    The thing is, the top 2 carry 80% of the load, with #3 picking up 15% and the last 2 taking on spot duty for injuries and special teams
  16. primetime

    primetime Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +125 / 19 / -8

    #18 Jersey

    1. Branch
    2. Moulds
    3. Keyshawn
    4. Troy
    5. Draft
    6. Childress
  17. AzPatsFan

    AzPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    5,996
    Likes Received:
    67
    Ratings:
    +133 / 10 / -8

    Answer to the question?

    to the poster who was concerned that with the proposed WR set that two would retire after 2006 or more likely 2007.

    I have asked the question and not just rhetorically several times to no answer, "Can you be too young?". Right now the only Pats over thirty on Offense are Dillon at 31, and no-longer-a-starter Troy Brown at 34.

    It is reasonable to want some veteran continuity on a squad, and the errors conmmitted on Offense prevented them from advancing past Denver. Or have you forgotten? It issi a very reasonable concern, and this proposed WR corps helps answer it.

    Furthemore I consider it a major UPGRADE in talent.

    You would be fielding three #1 type WRs, and two #1 type TEs as well as a premium QB and a #1 type RB even without any other augmentation and we all expect additions at RB. Compare that to last season with only a single #1 and single #2 at WR, on the roster, the TEs (one of whom wasa essentially a rook), and an injured #1 RB with two rooks on the O-line.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>