- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 16,682
- Reaction score
- 3,686
Harvin has made it well known that he expects to get paid this offseason, whether it's by the Vikings or someone else. So I think that any Pats move for Harvin would require that Welker moves on. The issue isn't so much in 2013 (Gronk is still cheap), bit in 2014 when Gronk, Hernandez, Lloyd, Harvin, and Welker would all have cap hits of at least $4.2M, and quite a bit more for Welker and Harvin, most likely.
This isn't a direct response to you, Sciz, but I'll take the Welkah I know over the quasi-Welkah I don't.
Just to be 100% clear, Harvin is NOT part of my "blueprint" for the Pats. My priorities are to preferably re-sign Welker to a 3 year deal (I think he's proven he's not going to drop off anytime soon) and franchise him as a backup option, re-sign Edelman, and draft a developmental WR, a number of whom have been discussed in this thread and elsewhere.
The Harvin idea is just something to keep an eye on. He's a guy with some potential interest given his skill set, and a guy that BB apparently had some interest in previously. Depending on how sour his relationship in Minny gets, his sitation could become interesting, and chance favors the prepared mind. Getting Jeff Demps or Jake Ballard wouldn't have been part of my "blueprint" a year ago, but both were good opportunities that the Pats seized when they arose, and if Harvin because available and the opportunity presented itself, I expect they would explore it - either as an alternative to Welker if that situation wasn't progressing, or in addition if it could be finagled under the cap. But the probability is exceedingly low, and I wouldn't do any more than tuck the idea away for now and keep an eye on his situation after the season.