SeanBruschi54
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 3,718
- Reaction score
- 179
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Thanks for the updates - I'm shocked the coaches were so honest; I'm hoping for Ryan Williams with 2b.Guys Ivan Fears said that the Pats dont like Ingram or Leshoure
Thanks for the updates - I'm shocked the coaches were so honest; I'm hoping for Ryan Williams with 2b.
I had one out of three.Willams, Murray and Thomas were guys he mentioned by name that they want as a 3 down back.
I had one out of three.
I found the third down back more telling, it suggests they not only expect Green-Ellis to continue to carry the load, but they are showing some anticipation Eric Kettani will be competitive right away after a two year deployment.
He said 3 down back.
Not 3rd down back.
- Have a better burst/speed than BJGE
- Have more bulk/power than Woodhead
- Are legitimate options to catch the ball
- Show effort and decent effectiveness in pass protection
- Don't have major ball-security issues
S=Speed/Explosion, B=Bulk/Power, P=Passing Game Contributions. Black type indicates a notable strength, red a borderline area. I = Significant Injury Concerns.
Leshoure, M (B, P)
Williams, R (I)
Murray, D (P, S, B)
Vereen, S (P)
Green, A (I)
Carter, D (B)
Harper, J (P)
Scott, D (I)
Allen, A (B)
A few days back I posted a list of the RBs who passed a basic screen for a potential 3-down upgrade:
I came up with a list which I've since amended slightly. (Note that the screen does NOT assess their actual running talent.)
I came up with a list which I've since amended slightly. (Note that the screen does NOT assess their actual running talent.)
Wow no one is happy here with Solder