- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 5,511
- Reaction score
- 2,299
His 2006 salary used to be listed as $460,000. It is now listed as $1,552,000.
http://www.nflpa.org/members/playerProfile.asp?ID=34642
http://www.nflpa.org/members/playerProfile.asp?ID=34642
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Miguel said:His 2006 salary used to be listed as $460,000. It is now listed as $1,552,000.
http://www.nflpa.org/members/playerProfile.asp?ID=34642
DefenseRules said:Wow.
What's going on? Did these guys reach some kind of escalator in their contract?
PATSNUTme said:Is this raise and Branch's raise included when Clayton showed us being 4mil under the cap.
I never disagree with John Clayton's number even when I can't explain it.Do you agree that we are 4 mil under?
Miguel said:His 2006 salary used to be listed as $460,000. It is now listed as $1,552,000.
http://www.nflpa.org/members/playerProfile.asp?ID=34642
flutie2phelan said:Is there ANY reason ... the Pats should give a million dollars to someone ... on IR ... who becomes a free agent next year?
Except that they have signed him to a longer contract ... of whose iceberg this is the visible tip?
Miguel said:Koppen must have done enough in 2003 and 2004 to earn the escalator. Since Koppen does not have a 2007 salary, his contract was not extended.
Miguel said:His 2006 salary used to be listed as $460,000. It is now listed as $1,552,000.
http://www.nflpa.org/members/playerProfile.asp?ID=34642
JOhnnyBravo said:can I get one of those kind of raises?
dryheat44 said:Is there any chance that this is salary not paid by the Pats, but under the NFL plan for players under rookie contracts who far outperform their contracts, like Koppen three years ago and Gay two years ago? Or is that plan solely for rookies?
It seems strange that all these increases (Branch, Samuel, Koppen) are going to guys with one year left on their rookie deal.