The way I see it there seem to be two schools of thought as to how to assemble a roster. The first is along the lines of building a depth chart (figure number of roster spots allocated to each position, fill with best players). The second is more along the lines of filling roles (starters, plus coverage LB, Pass rush specialist, Key STers, etc...). As tempting as it may be to think along the depth chart building method, I think the latter is the way BB thinks. (Actually, it is probably a little of both, but I digress.) I recall Parcells talking about filling out his roster and (to paraphrase) he said: You basically know who your starters and key backups are gonna be, then you have the guys that play on packages like third downs, add in back up QB and guys in the kicking game and you only have two or three spots left on game day. At that point i'm looking for guys that can possibly make a difference, like block a kick, make a play on Special Teams, create a difficult matchup. You are not really looking for a guys who is your third or fourth option at LB or OL. If you have to rely on those guys, you are pretty much done anyway.
The way I see it there are compelling reasons for opting for Klecko or Thomas. If you are looking for that special skills guy, of the two, Klecko is the choice. If you want the better all-around player who is essentially injury protection, keep Thomas.
Given the depth and position flexibility of the six guys ahead of them, I think Klecko brings more to the table. No slight to Thomas, but he may need to flourish on another team.
The way I see it there are compelling reasons for opting for Klecko or Thomas. If you are looking for that special skills guy, of the two, Klecko is the choice. If you want the better all-around player who is essentially injury protection, keep Thomas.
Given the depth and position flexibility of the six guys ahead of them, I think Klecko brings more to the table. No slight to Thomas, but he may need to flourish on another team.
