John Dowd in Editorial on CNN: Was Brady Ambushed ?

[TommyD4207]

Ben Volin is a reporter, right? Isn't it his job to find out why Dowd has created a deflategate site?

It didn't show up in his Twitter feed.

 

[TommyD4207]

That is such a Volin response. But why? Because unlike MCI, some people actually care about the truth. Because they get the point of media, and they aren't lazy clickbait ******** peddlers.

It's also horrendously irresponsible for a "reporter" to talk like that. Here, let me try:

I sure hope that Ben Volin isn't a child molester. I wonder if a detailed investigation would uncover that Ben Volin is a child molester. Do we have any evidence that Ben Volin isn't a child molester? I would really hate it if the public came to associate Ben Volin with child molester because people like me keep typing stuff like this. I bear no responsibility in this, though, because I'm just posing baseless, hypothetical questions that have no reason to be written down in the first place.

https://www.google.com/search?q=ben+volin+is+a+child+molester&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

2.6+million results. It must be true.

 

[eom]

Deflategate Facts ‏@DeflategateFact 10m10 minutes ago

Tomorrow at 6:40 am ET: Watch John Dowd, lead investigator in MLB's Pete Rose case, discuss the real #deflategatefacts on @Morning_Joe

 

[farn]

Ok. What is Dowd's motivation ? Who is paying him to be so thorough and such an endearing pitbull about this situation ?

 

[VectorPrime]

Ok. What is Dowd's motivation ? Who is paying him to be so thorough and such an endearing pitbull about this situation ?

Id prefer we never ever find out.

 

[farn]

Id prefer we never ever find out.

At first, it was an article on cnn. Then, the site address accompanied the article. Twitter, massive updates... This guy surely isn't doing this for giggles is he ?

 

[eom]

fyi he's been tweeting up a storm

https://twitter.com/DeflategateFact

unfortunately, only 240 followers so far

 

[TheBeers]

Ok. What is Dowd's motivation ? Who is paying him to be so thorough and such an endearing pitbull about this situation ?

I do not know, but I like it..

Maybe he has an eye on the commish job? Maybe he just sees the huge injustice for what it is? Maybe... just maybe.. and this is me dreaming a bit here.. Judge Berman can appoint him the new neutral arbitrator?

 

[Ivan]

Ok. What is Dowd's motivation ? Who is paying him to be so thorough and such an endearing pitbull about this situation ?

Who cares? I hope it's Kraft.

 

[farn]

I like the Dowd material. Logic, easy to follow, from a highly respectable source.

 

[patfanken]

Glad to see this thread maintain its position at the top of the front page. This is the blueprint I hope the NFLPA uses on the 19th after this "settlement" charade ends tomorrow.

 

[Koma]

fyi he's been tweeting up a storm

https://twitter.com/DeflategateFact

unfortunately, only 240 followers so far

Up to 252 now on 31 tweets. It looks like he started on 8/7.

I think a lot of people looking at this story have been saying "There's a real story here, and it doesn't involve Brady or the Patriots. Why is no one looking into the NFL's behavior since January?" Dowd may be that person.

 

[SVN]

At first, it was an article on cnn. Then, the site address accompanied the article. Twitter, massive updates... This guy surely isn't doing this for giggles is he ?

maybe someone can ask him on twitter or during his interview?

 

[Gronkowski123]

brady has to ****ing win!!! at all costs
no games.

 

[RelocatedPatFan]

Deflategate Facts ‏@DeflategateFact 10m10 minutes ago

Tomorrow at 6:40 am ET: Watch John Dowd, lead investigator in MLB's Pete Rose case, discuss the real #deflategatefacts on @Morning_Joe

is that MSNBC? if so, I'll have to check in to see the reaction. could be a nice little nudge in the right direction (hopefully it gets picked up by national news).

 

[Oswlek]

That is such a Volin response. But why? Because unlike MCI, some people actually care about the truth. Because they get the point of media, and they aren't lazy clickbait ******** peddlers.

It's also horrendously irresponsible for a "reporter" to talk like that. Here, let me try:

I sure hope that Ben Volin isn't a child molester. I wonder if a detailed investigation would uncover that Ben Volin is a child molester. Do we have any evidence that Ben Volin isn't a child molester? I would really hate it if the public came to associate Ben Volin with child molester because people like me keep typing stuff like this. I bear no responsibility in this, though, because I'm just posing baseless, hypothetical questions that have no reason to be written down in the first place.

 

[eom]

maybe someone can ask him on twitter or during his interview?

I don't think you could ever get an honest answer on twitter, if at all.
not that he'd confide in some random stranger, but twitter's public

 

[WinstonSmith]

Ok. What is Dowd's motivation ? Who is paying him to be so thorough and such an endearing pitbull about this situation ?

Did anyone watch?

 

[RelocatedPatFan]

Did anyone watch?

I caught the segment which didn't really add anything of value.

They had Sal Palantonio for the "other" side as well (and he sidestepped the non-correction of the 11 of 12 footballs much better than Goodell ever has)

But it was all fairly basic (for what we've been dealing with). Dowd really wasn't talking about the meeting today and was strong saying they didn't even have any evidence (which commenced into a brief conversation of how did we get to this point. Dowd felt the whole investigation and ruling should have been settled in a few days).

The commentators did seem pro Patriots and the better moments were the few Jets/Geno stabs they got in at the end. A "typical" Jets comment when talking about what happened and then one of the commentators made a joke that Geno tried to throw a punch back, but it was intercepted.