Fanfrom1960
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 3,242
- Reaction score
- 111
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Boy, was I wrong. I didn't see that the Colts had a TD overturned, which would have made it 17 - 0 in the first period. Raiders looking scrappy. Go Raiders.I have to disagree....the Raiders are pulling it together and have just completed a 20 play drive down the field after stopping the Colts at the 4 inch line on fourth down.
Score: 10 - 7 Colts but the Raiders are actually stuffing it down the Colts throats.
Sweet...
Boy, was I wrong. I didn't see that the Colts had a TD overturned, which would have made it 17 - 0 in the first period. Raiders looking scrappy. Go Raiders.
Boy, was I wrong. I didn't see that the Colts had a TD overturned, which would have made it 17 - 0 in the first period. Raiders looking scrappy. Go Raiders.
Boy, was I wrong. I didn't see that the Colts had a TD overturned, which would have made it 17 - 0 in the first period. Raiders looking scrappy. Go Raiders.
You wouldn't happen to be a hockey fan, would you? Quarters, my good man, quarters!
period, stanza, quarters, innings - it's all just semantics.
So, the Canadian comes to the defense of the hockey fan. Just having some fun guys, but seriously, referring to quarters as periods grates the ear of the football fan.
Oakland takes the lead. At least a moral victory in the making here.And the Colts fair catch the ball at their four yard line. :singing: