- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 20,536
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The more and more I think about BB inactions in replacing Vrabel, the more I'm thinking that the Pats are going to come out next year in a 4-3.
Think about it, more and more teams are switching to the 3-4 which means more teams have to prepare for it. Now BB suddenly comes out in a 4-3 that looks like this:
Seymour-Brace-Wilfork-Warren
Crable-Mayo-Thomas
I'll take that front 7 over anyone else's
With Green rotating in with the DEs and Wright rotating in with the DTs.
Maybe this is why BB drafted 3 college DT last year? The Pats made there run in 2001 using a 4-3, and they used it to get alot of pressure on the QBs. It would free Seymour and take pressure off the OLBs.
And oh BTW, Woods is awful
The more and more I think about BB inactions in replacing Vrabel, the more I'm thinking that the Pats are going to come out next year in a 4-3.
Think about it, more and more teams are switching to the 3-4 which means more teams have to prepare for it. Now BB suddenly comes out in a 4-3 that looks like this:
Seymour-Brace-Wilfork-Warren
Crable-Mayo-Thomas
I'll take that front 7 over anyone else's
With Green rotating in with the DEs and Wright rotating in with the DTs.
Maybe this is why BB drafted 3 college DT last year? The Pats made there run in 2001 using a 4-3, and they used it to get alot of pressure on the QBs. It would free Seymour and take pressure off the OLBs.
And oh BTW, Woods is awful
Seymour-Brace-Wilfork-Warren
With Green rotating in with the DEs
here come the Woods haters in 3,,,2,,,,1,,,
nobody hates woods........
he's just not a good OLB
The more and more I think about BB inactions in replacing Vrabel, the more I'm thinking that the Pats are going to come out next year in a 4-3.
Think about it, more and more teams are switching to the 3-4 which means more teams have to prepare for it. Now BB suddenly comes out in a 4-3 that looks like this:
Seymour-Brace-Wilfork-Warren
Crable-Mayo-Thomas
I'll take that front 7 over anyone else's
With Green rotating in with the DEs and Wright rotating in with the DTs.
Maybe this is why BB drafted 3 college DT last year? The Pats made there run in 2001 using a 4-3, and they used it to get alot of pressure on the QBs. It would free Seymour and take pressure off the OLBs.
And oh BTW, Woods is awful
Jesus, you've beaten me up suggesting otherwise, assuring that he can do what you are now putting in a conditional clause.If Woods can set the edge and cover TEs, he'll be more than adequate.
Jesus, you've beaten me up suggesting otherwise, assuring that he can do what you are now putting in a conditional clause.
I guess now you feel the jury is still out regarding Woods. My thoughts exactly.
Our LBer corps the last two or three years have been slow. Woods isn't the answer. He's. Not. The. Answer.
He's a STer who can sub. I can't be fair to him, though, since his execrable attempt to hold onto a fumble recovery on a miserable SB vs. the Giants. How he gave it up to a tiny RB who wasn't even drafted seems to me to indicate he doesn't have that toughness and grit I'm looking for.
Wrong. All I'm saying is don't waste your time with Woods when Crable's available. Woods sucks. That's not panicky. That's reality. Get over it.
Simply put, Woods, good guy and all, is not the answer at OLB. We're hurting at that position.