Willie Andrews23
On the Roster
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=chadiha_jeffri&id=3576284
now you will see the sharks coming out for BB again this season. i really dont understand this logic of BB is nothing without brady. Sure he needs brady to win but so does every coach need a qb. This is hypocritical of the highest order. these idiots claimed spygate helped the pats. so it must mean it helped brady right ? no...brady was still a HOF QB but they cant accept that bb is one..
BB also has a (very)tough-minded team. It's not like he's coaching the Cowboys and their mental midgets, nor the Chargers and their explosive, whining personalities.
I dunno why people are getting upset about this. Its been questioned for the past 5 years: how would BB do without Brady or how would Brady do without BB. Its been a mantra for opposing fans "Brady is nothing without BB/BB is nothign witout Brady".
Kind of like that other popular question "how would Brady do in Indy and how would Peyton do in NE"
Yeah, there's no logic. What about Jimmy Johnson without Aikman, Chuck Noll without Bradshaw, Mike Shannahan without Elway. Etc, etc.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=chadiha_jeffri&id=3576284
now you will see the sharks coming out for BB again this season. i really dont understand this logic of BB is nothing without brady. Sure he needs brady to win but so does every coach need a qb. This is hypocritical of the highest order. these idiots claimed spygate helped the pats. so it must mean it helped brady right ? no...brady was still a HOF QB but they cant accept that bb is one..
You know what is really pathetic about the entire thing?
Since day one, the pundits and Patriots haters have said that Brady is nothing but a "System QB" and that the Patriots didn't need him to win. Now, all were hearing is how it was BRADY and not BB?
Anyone else see the hypocracy in that?
Yeah, Belichick got so lucky to just repeatedly happen on non-whining, team oriented players!
How much luck can one guy get!
LOL... ya know what? If Cassel plays well, it'll just be a case of how Scott Pioli (did I mention he's Parcell's son-in-law? Now there's a great coach!) caught lightning in the bottle twice. (And how it's such a tragedy he'll have to go back to the bench next year.)
Come on guys. A team has enough variables that you can ascribe a QB to his great receivers, a coach and the receivers to the QBs, and both to the offensive line.
All such analyses will be indulged in derogatorily to a greater extent with the Pats, because the Pats are (still) hated.
Get ready to be hated more for struggling back without Brady.
The only way for it not to happen is for the Pats to decline to mediocrity, and become a non-story, a "once-proud franchise." It's the template they need to see come true.
PFnV[/QUOTE:Correct.
You know what is really pathetic about the entire thing?
Since day one, the pundits and Patriots haters have said that Brady is nothing but a "System QB" and that the Patriots didn't need him to win. Now, all were hearing is how it was BRADY and not BB?
Anyone else see the hypocracy in that?
Guys, are you serious?
This article is AWESOME?
The media is doing all the work for BB....
We are back to being the underdog.
I LOVE this man, are you kidding me?