Ollie
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 870
- Reaction score
- 1,033
Yes.
Yes. A government who has a list of who has what guns where can easily take them away. Private gun ownership should give them pause (and it gives other countries pause about invading the US.
In a modern society how likely are you to need to use guns to counter an invasion or against your own govt? and would private gun ownership really give pause? Especially against an invading force who would be much more organised and with more advanced weapons? I can't see that pausing anyone more than the US military would.
From afar we see the US as quite a violent society with an issue with mass shootings of which many seem to happen in schools. In the UK we have no gun ownership and no school shootings and almost no mass killing events in schools at all. There is no need for metal detectors at schools and we don't need to run shooter drills. Your homicide rate is 5x that of the UK per capita. Are these linked to gun ownership? IS the increased risk and violence an issue with guns or just an element of your society we don't have and independent of guns? If there is a link is gun ownership and alll that comes with it balanced by the positives of giving pause to Govt and an invading army? how likely is it that you would ever need guns against your Govt and an invading army?
Often pro gun advocates will talk about knife crime in the UK to counter and it's true that it is an issue but mass knifings are rare although one did happen recently in Nottingham and mass school knifing events don't happen at all. As i say is this due to no gun ownership or just differences in our society such as differences in mental healthcare? Apologies ofr the stream of consciousness its morning here and i think i might have had to much coffee