- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 4,703
- Reaction score
- 6,840
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Then, according to some in here, they are being exploited and should sue the Patriots also.
I think teams make a decent amount of money off cheerleaders, Calendars, photo ops, etc. If they were such a money pit that they didn't make any money off them then they wouldn't have had them beforeHow much incremental revenue do the teams get because of cheerleaders? Probably none, which is justification for getting rid of them. This may be a pyrrhic victory for the cheerleaders.
There's advantages to being a contractor also. For instance, a workplace injury could leave the contractor/employer liable, but if they are an employee then workers compensation insurance covers and usually make liability claims not possible. They could end up with less for an on the job injury as employees.
At least that's what I was taught in a business class. It sounds like the cheerleaders fit the IRS definition of an employee (which is not well defined). Whether they should have fought to be employees, or whether there should be external rules outside of what the two parties agree with is a different discussion though.
Dude, admit it, you flubbed up. Doubling down on it just makes you look even worse.Do me a favor: Go into the business world and use the term "corporation" to refer to privately-held, incorporated entities.
They won't openly laugh at you, but trust me when I say they'll be thinking "ok this guy doesn't know what he is talking about."
Name 1? The closest thing I read to that was Primetime speculating that they may fall under the same ruling as the cheerleaders. You might wanna look into your doctor tweaking your meds.Then, according to some in here, they are being exploited and should sue the Patriots also.
Does this mean no representation without taxation?Have you ever heard of unpaid internships? As mentioned above, the Patriot musketeers are unpaid volunteers. Do you think they are being extorted?
Do me a favor: Go into the business world and use the term "corporation" to refer to privately-held, incorporated entities.
They won't openly laugh at you, but trust me when I say they'll be thinking "ok this guy doesn't know what he is talking about."
How much incremental revenue do the teams get because of cheerleaders? Probably none, which is justification for getting rid of them. This may be a pyrrhic victory for the cheerleaders.
Name 1? The closest thing I read to that was Primetime speculating that they may fall under the same ruling as the cheerleaders. You might wanna look into your doctor tweaking your meds.
The sad thing is that, even in the face of obvious evidence that you're wrong, you continue to spin and twist in a desperate attempt to convince yourself and others that you're right. Nobody knows everything and everyone makes mistakes. When you learn from them and move on, mistakes can be opportunities for growth. The twisting and justification required in the refusal to acknowledge obvious mistakes just makes it worse, and over time, can cause considerable damage.