Welcome to PatsFans.com

Ben Cherington....3 years in

Discussion in 'Red Sox Fan Forum' started by borg, Jun 11, 2014.

  1. borg

    borg Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,821
    Likes Received:
    50
    Ratings:
    +100 / 3 / -11

    Big Ben has built quite a unique resume. One U.S. championship (Isn't it slightly arrogant to even call the World Series the "WORLD" series) sandwiched between potentially two of the worst Red Saux teams in our lifetime. I'm sure 100% of Saux fans will take a 1 to 2 awesome to awful ratio if it meant a US championship (what other countries participate in this series that crowns the World champion) every three years....
    but how often will the Saux formula, signing FA's that were unable to secure long term contracts from the 29 other teams, really work. Basically, the Saux are limiting themselves to the defective players pile....AKA...the land of misfit toys. Lightning struck long and hard in '13, congrats for that, but based on the two seasons sandwiched around the US championship (why doesn't the MLS call their winner World champion) the law of averages will slowly reflect the truth of who the Saux really are.

    So what about Cherington...the GM. Is the new "limited contract" philosophy really his philosophy or is he just the loyal employee executing ownership's decree. Who could blame Henry and Co.for shying away from contracts that can crush a team's long term future. The fact remains, Big Ben carries the GM title and therefore deserves the scrutiny his title attracts......and in two out of the last 3 years, his teams are/were bottom feeders despite a top 5 payroll each and every year.
    I realize the master plan involves creating a new core of skilled/cheap players from the minor league system....which so happens to be the plan of ever team in MLB except the NYY and LAD....and from a cost effective stand point that sounds spectacular, but the savings this formula is supposed to provide apparently only gets deployed on players that all teams rejected as long term options....in other words...a diminished talent pool. To summarize..the Saux future....lots of rookie/sophomore types learning to be MLB every day players plus the best of the unwanted. How often can lightning be caught in the bottle?
    Big Ben has a tough job. Ownership has limited his available options based on the "no long term contracts"....and because of the '13 miracle ( I call it that because the parts were not nearly as good as the whole ...JMO), ownership will grasp even tighter to this new model ....until a few more especially bad seasons change the plan. It's looking like Ben has two in the hopper after 3 years.
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2014
  2. captain insano

    captain insano Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,628
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +54 / 1 / -16

    #11 Jersey

    I have a headache.
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. borg

    borg Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    3,821
    Likes Received:
    50
    Ratings:
    +100 / 3 / -11

    Rant continued
    Over the past 3 years, five bonafide stars have arrived in MLB, not through the draft, but from overseas and the Red Sox refused to engage in any of these auctions. Cespedes, Puig, and Abreu from Cuba....and Darvish and Tanaka from the far east. These are corner stone players a franchise builds a team around....but the Saux....not a sniff. Burnt by Dice K, ownership has clearly shied away from "all-in" contracts to these foreign born studs.
    So lets review. Ownership refuses to buy stud players on the FA market because the market will offer too many years (in the Saux view) and ownership refuses to bid at the foreign auction pool as well.
    So my question....where is the power going to come from to boost one of the weakest hitting teams in MLB. I don't see it in the minors right now, especially since the Saux have been stockpiling arms at the tops of their drafts, plus up the middle position players.
    The plan is likely to secure a Stanton type bat by trading 4 or 5 or 6 draft picks to a team financially constrained......The problem is....NO TEAM IS FINANCIALLY CONSTRAINED. Look at the Marlins....one of the most profitable teams in MLB even before the new TV contract kicked in this year. Problem #2 is that teams are willing to extend their young players long before these players hit their arbitration years....and most players jump at that opportunity to get that early security.
    So again I ask what is the plan? Wait for a stud who's willing to risk long term financially security and get to free agency? But then there is the nasty business of signing a 7-8 year contract at $20+ mill/year.....contracts the Saux want no part of...or..... Trade for a young stud with a bounty of prospects....and then sign him for a massive contract that may be a few mill cheaper over the long run.
    This team needs bats now. At least one big bat this year. And a year or two down the line, two or three. But from where.... Because we know what ownership won't do
    • Like Like x 1
  4. captain insano

    captain insano Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2006
    Messages:
    2,628
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +54 / 1 / -16

    #11 Jersey

    headache continued
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    37,936
    Likes Received:
    276
    Ratings:
    +549 / 4 / -12

    #87 Jersey

    We got spoiled last year ... I think Ben is back on track in rebuilding the team with a slight eye open to the playoffs because the AL is so mediocre.
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>