Welcome to PatsFans.com

Agree Or Disagree: Without Moss, Wes Welker Is a JAG

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by SuperPatsFan, Oct 8, 2010.

?

Agree or Disagree?

Poll closed Oct 13, 2010.
  1. Agree

    2.7%
  2. Disagree

    97.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SuperPatsFan

    SuperPatsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    In another thread, it was suggested that without Moss, Wes Welker is nothing but a JAG.

    Do you agree or disagree?
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2010
  2. xmarkd400x

    xmarkd400x 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    1,746
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    JAG? Yes.

    Just Another Great [Patriots Player]
     
  3. Disco Volante

    Disco Volante Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    6,242
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +58 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    What an embarrassing statement.
     
  4. strngplyr

    strngplyr In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,461
    Likes Received:
    115
    Ratings:
    +301 / 3 / -0

    Disagree. Welker will still have over 100 catches and 1000 yards on the year in my opinion, and most likely more TD's.

    He will still find holes in the defense and make things happen after the catch.
     
  5. JackBauer

    JackBauer Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    16,300
    Likes Received:
    319
    Ratings:
    +794 / 6 / -9

    Thank you for making this public.
     
  6. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    I agree.

    Anyone who thinks Welker is a JAG is delusional. He surely benefited from Moss' presence, as did Brady but that doesn't make either of them JAGs without him.
     
  7. TheGodInAGreyHoodie

    TheGodInAGreyHoodie Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0

    Without Moss, without Brady, without a QB, he is the best offensive player on the 2006 Dolphins.

    WW being a Jag is one of the most moronic statements in a week of moronic statements.
     
  8. Patspsycho

    Patspsycho Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    9,930
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  9. Brady2Welker

    Brady2Welker Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Messages:
    891
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Might as well ask if Bradys going to be a jag too.
     
  10. Willie55

    Willie55 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,803
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Seeing is how he had 67 catches on a far inferior Miami Dolphin team in 2006, I'd say no.
     
  11. Calciumee

    Calciumee PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,613
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -1

    #3 Jersey

  12. Sciz

    Sciz PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,352
    Likes Received:
    144
    Ratings:
    +394 / 1 / -0

    Welker was basically being doubled even when Moss was on the team. If anything, defenses will focus on Hernandez a little more, not triple Welker...
     
  13. strngplyr

    strngplyr In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,461
    Likes Received:
    115
    Ratings:
    +301 / 3 / -0

    Hell, if anything Welker may have an easier time if teams are gonna put more in the Box and not in pass coverage. Welker is already doubled quite a bit. :)
     
  14. SuperPatsFan

    SuperPatsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Given that the votes are public, will anyone have the stones to vote "Agree"? ;)
     
  15. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    We'll find out. I'm just worried it could to be too easy for teams to double Welker, Hernandez and it's game over.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2010
  16. PowerRunRevival

    PowerRunRevival On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    I've seen this term used on the board before but I have no idea what JAG means.
     
  17. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Just Another Guy
     
  18. TB=TD

    TB=TD Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Messages:
    747
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    This statement may sound foolish but 99% of these mediots will claim Wes Welker and Brady can't be anything without Moss.
     
  19. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    17,668
    Likes Received:
    345
    Ratings:
    +1,123 / 17 / -4

    #12 Jersey

    Of course not- he wasn't a JAG in Miami. He won't be nearly the threat that he was from 2007-2009, but he'll still be a quality receiver.
     
  20. JR4

    JR4 In the Starting Line-up PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,825
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ratings:
    +41 / 3 / -2

    Hmmmmmmmmmm who asks this question?

    some threads just errk me .... this is one! :confused:

    Wes may never be what he once was but
    it will have nothing to do with moss.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>