Gronkowski123
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 10,384
- Reaction score
- 5,791
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This is the last team the Pats wanted to come to Foxboro ..
This is this week's last team the Pats wanted to come to Foxboro. Funny, last week it was the Ravens even with the Colts being a possibility to come into Foxboro.
LOL, this is how you describe every opponent. This time, however, I actually agree with you!
Vontae Davis is actually a stud (unlike a certain Denver CB), but is he also a member of the "cant' cover Edelman" club?
If they put him on Lafell to take him out of the game, who cares.
Are you actually buying into his nonsense. You were also wrong about the Ravens. But ignore that, now let's mock the people who correctly pointed out the toughness of the matchup by being snarky.
It's hard to take an analysis serious that never changes. I agree with him however. We should dominate their rush offense and control the deep stuff against Hilton like we've done against every player of his type we've faced. Luck is an undisciplined gunslinger so we should def benefit from his aggressive tendencies. Also the run game will more than likely make a comeback and we should control TOP as well. I don't see many advantages for Indy.
I was right about the Pats offense vs. the Ravens defense, but underestimated their offense.
And the Colts are not the last team the Pats wanted to face. Last week other than the Bengals, they were the team people universally wanted to face most in the playoffs.
How is my analysis
You predicted a decisive victory. Double digits. No problems. Gotta own that part atleast.
The offense was very good. Gameplan was magnifique. Could've used more Vereen/Blount but otherwise a perfect game plan imo.
I guess the proper word is prediction. But you have a very Pats slanted take on the oppositions strength at times.
How is my analysis the same? The reason why I think the Pats will beat the Colts are not the same why I thought they would beat the Ravens. the only similarities are I correctly pointed out people were overrated both their defenses.
And I could care less if you take my opinions seriously.
if you never offer what actually makes the matchup tough than how can it be genuine analysis? I never said I didn't take it seriously, I said it makes me question it, As in if you are just saying what we/you want to hear. There were obvious area's we didn't have a win in and some of those presented issues. The colts aren't the same for a multitude of reasons. The defense is one of them. The Pats scrapped their entire running game out of respect to that defense.