SidelineSid
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 191
- Reaction score
- 0
I liked your draft a lot. However, to nitpick, I think that picking 27th is generous right now, and that we're more like to pick in the 21-25 range. With that in mind, I've slot us where Arizona is picking at 22 and 54, in which case I would be even happier with the following (juniors with an *):
22. Cameron Heyward*, DE, Ohio State. 6'6" 287# guy who I think could be the next Richard Seymour at the 5 technique. Good pick. I like this option. The one question that I have to ask is: Do we have to take him this high? The scouting reports on this guy is that he's better suited for a 3-4 than a 4-3. If he falls to us, he would have fallen past teams like the Jets and 49er's. Other than the Chargers, I don't think there are too many teams that we have to worry about stealing him from us.
47. Greg Romeus*, DE/OLB, Pittsburgh. 6'5" 265# monster with a non-stop motor. I really, really like this pick. The only problem is that ther's a rumor going around that he might stay another year. I hope it's not true.
48. Gabe Carimi*, OT/OG, Wyoming. A 6'7" 325# beast who should be able to play RG or RT equally.
54. Austen Lane, DE/OLB, Murray State. A 6'6" 260# freak with 4.6 speed and DeMarcus Ware agility (6.70 3-cone, 4.07 20 yard shuttle).
I love Beal and Graham and would be happy with both, but I think that Lane is better suited to play in space than Graham and that Romeus and Lane offer the kind of length and athleticism that BB loves. I love Iupati, but I can't turn up the chance to get a blue chip prospect at 3-4 DE, and I think Gabe Carimi should be about as good for as at RG/RT.
I like Golden Tate, but I still don't see what he provides that a healthy Brandon Tate shouldn't. Give B. Tate a chance before drafting another Tate.
Short of landing Rolando McClain, that would be about as good a draft as I could imagine.
To who ever mentioned Jermaine Gresham, please don't. for the love of all that's sweet and beautiful, please don't jinx us. Bill has spent 10,000 draft picks on the tight end position. I really hope that we don't do it again. If we do, it would have been the third time in ten years that we would have devoted a first round pick on that position. It is dumb. Especially considering that we don't even use the tight end as a receiver that often, it doesn't make sense. To this day, I don't know why Bill spends so many draft picks on them, and then rarely uses them.