PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

2022 NE Patriots offensive scheme


For you, last year's offense under a rookie QB was sooo bad that we needed to completely scrap Belichick's two year plan of developing the offense, scrap Belichick's offense of the last 20 years, and install a new offensive. After all, there are better teams on offense that need to be copied.
???
Are you saying that the myriad of reports that have come out about Pats changing O to more OZBS based on practices, players picked, what both Bourne and Bill have said are poppy ****?

You think that selecting non PTPs like Strong & Thornton & even Strange has nothing to do with a change in the scheme? How Jonnu could benefit from this scheme? How this scheme could help Mac since its QB friendly?

Analysts observations of OLs, RBs, QBs, WRs running this type of scheme at OTAs is incorrect?

You think Bill is just wasting time trying to fool everyone into believing this?

Huh
 
Thankfully, youre not running this team.

In 2021 the Pats were 6th in points for with 462. Great huh? To you, but I deal in FACTS.

174 points accounted for games vs Jacksonville, Cleveland and the NY Jets - 79 points scored on the Jets alone. The Patriots padded the ledger vs the train wreck franchises. 5 losses in 2021 were games where the Pats could only generate 17 points or less.

NE 16 - Miami 17
NE 13 - NO 28
NE 17 - Tampa 19
Indy 27 - NE 17
NE 17 - Buffalo 47

My conclusion is that the Pats need to score more points. My conclusion is that defenses do not respect the Patriots deep passing game. You can come up with all the excuses, if, and or buts that you choose. From the writing on the wall the Patriots are changing the offense.

Go complain to Belichick if you dont approve.


That wasn't a fact?
 
Are you saying that the myriad of reports that have come out about Pats changing O to more OZBS based on practices, players picked, what both Bourne and Bill have said are poppy ****?

You think that selecting non PTPs like Strong & Thornton & even Strange has nothing to do with a change in the scheme? How Jonnu could benefit from this scheme? How this scheme could help Mac since its QB friendly?

Analysts observations of OLs, RBs, QBs, WRs running this type of scheme at OTAs is incorrect?

You think Bill is just wasting time trying to fool everyone into believing this?

Huh
There will be changes.

How will we judge whether this has been a massive change?

Obviously, we will have changes with the change from Josh, and Jones being to take on more responsibilities in a passing game.
 
Me being a smart azz aside, they had a very good ground game and have a solid RB duo. I like the potential of Strong and hope he gets time as a kick returner at the very least.

Mac has shown a lot of promise in only his first year.

Parker, Thornton, Strange, and Strong is Bill telling the offense wasn't good enough to go up against better teams.
Our change to offensive personnel in the offense isn't more than Bill did last year. Yes, we still needed upgrades. We always will. And yes, contracts always end.

With regard to Strong, I want our top returners to get reps. M Jones is more likely to be that player than Strong. I hope that everyone is healthy and then Strong won't be used (or be active) much at all.
 
I don’t think offensive scheme is going to change as much as people here think.
 
I don’t think offensive scheme is going to change as much as people here think.

I would tend to agree, but BB is usually very tight lipped, so for him to say that things are changing makes me think there is real change afoot. Also the FB (J Johnson) was not re-signed, even at minimal $$, and was told the Pats were going in a new direction. KB also said things are going to be different. A lot of smoke from an organization that is usually very tight lipped.
 
I hope things change from Bill's OLD schemes. The days of dinking and dunking for long SLOW moving drives is hopefully OVER.

Offense needs to become more EXPLOSIVE to compete w/ all the NEW era offenses. Why get all these young FAST players?
 
I hope things change from Bill's OLD schemes. The days of dinking and dunking for long SLOW moving drives is hopefully OVER.

Offense needs to become more EXPLOSIVE to compete w/ all the NEW era offenses. Why get all these young FAST players?
Please list those successful NEW era offenses that don't depend on a top quarterback.

There are many top offenses. Almost all rely on a top5 or potential top 5 QB.

And yes, those offenses are often styled differently than other offenses, taking advantage of the particular strengths of their quarterback.
 
Not sure if the bolded is sarcasm but it's all anyone has been talking about lol. I suppose we needed a thread though, it's relevant for sure. Hopefully it's worthwhile that doesn't turn into something else by page 4. So I'll add this from my thread the other day ...

"Re: OZ / Stretch plays. Someone asked (@Vindicate ). I've been sick, just exhausted off work. Haven't been in here as much.

Did anything interesting happen in the last week????

Anyway I just wrote about Pierre Strong in another thread and a lot of what I said there applies to what you want out of a RB for OZ / Wide, stretch plays. He really has a lot of what you need and is well equipped for that specific role.

from the recap thread ....

"Hes got serious acceleration and fast twitch. Which after patience/setting up your blocks, is the most important thing for stretch plays, OZ imo. Basically has one gear but he gets to 0-100 real quick. Good long speed but he gets into top gear extremely fast. I mentioned it above but he's very good, very patient setting up his blocks and not just for stretch plays. Using them to his advantage to help shape the 2nd & 3rd levels. Its very subtle and tough to recognize but he does a nice job shaping the landscape to his liking. Having 4.3 speed doesn't hurt but the impressive part of that is that Strong is very good at keeping full speed while shifting, changing his path, weaving through defenders. One of the more impressive things about his game. He's got some nice COD at full speed. Not so much bounce around like Barry Sanders COD but a little shifting here & there, turning while keeping top speed."

What Shanahan said ...
"But the type of guys you want are guys who can put their foot in the ground, get downhill. You do want guys who can run and create arm tackles and then run through them. I'm not looking for a guy...that you have to give 30 carries to to get 100 yards. You want guys who get downhill, who get over four yards a carry and they move the chains for you."

So if you were to ask me what the most important attributes/qualities are for a RB in a zone scheme, specifically outside/wide zone I'd say the following ...

1)it takes a certain back to run this system but the OL are still the star of the show. The lanes and movement they create allow for for those big plays to develop. I remember always wondering why running backs won't simply bounce it outside when I first started watching ball. Seemed like the edge was there be taken. But the lateral speed even back then was incredible. You can't just win with pure speed 99% percent of the time. That lateral movement is a killer for some guys, combined with motion (hello TT?) it's that much more difficult. Getting those LB's moving east-west, hesitating for a half second, thinking instead of closing ground, leads to those big plays. Following your blocks, allowing OL to kick, climb and clear space, showing a little patience but not living off it. Is key.

2) decisiveness / vision - these are together at least imo bc one doesnt matter without the other. You could have the best vision in the world but without those instincts and decision making to make a move its useless. In general backs have more freedom to be flexible in a power scheme and depending on the blockers in front of them and their own athleticism, they might be afforded more patience overall. Zone runs, especially wide/stretch plays, require precise timing. Athleticism matters and obviously helps but your straight line speed and quick mater more than COD/3 Cone. Missing your lane while moving laterally is a quick death in the NFL. So you have to be decisive and have above average open field vision. You can't afford to be too patient, lanes close in a hurry. It's impossible to capture the edge on every wide run so at times you have to just take what's there. You're not always going to take the edge and scream down the sideline for 50. You have "aiming points" but cant just stick to the script for the sake every time. You need to generate positive yards.

In general amost every "aiming point" for a RB is their tackles midline/hip or their TE/"Ghost TE" hip. Those two obviously are usually near the perimeter so again not everything plays as planned. Depending on the emlos (end man on line of scrimmage), who's reached, whos not, what a defense is trying to do. Generally the plan is as follows ...

A)"bounce" take the outside if possible. No hesitation if there's a path outside you "bounce" it outside and take the most outside path you.

B)"bend" kick inside following your OL climbing to the LB.

C)"bang" generally same, looking for over pursuing defenders.

This is where you watch film and ask yourself was that oz? Was that duo or iz?

3)Acceleration/quick twitch. There's different types of speed and having quick twitch, real acceleration is key. Especially for this run. Everyone is fast. Having that burst, explosion is a lot more important than having "long speed", separation is king in this league.

There are other traits you want but those would be my most important for a RB in that scheme. Strong reminds me of a Shanahan type back in the mold of Brieda and Mosert.

I've noticed a few reporters and new players (Parker) talk about how much we're running in camp. Now it's important to remember the NEP are notorious for their strength and conditioning programs. There's a few a teams that are in extra good shape and the Pats have always been one of them. Nonetheless it reminded me of this quote from KS ...

"the main thing we're going to get these linemen, when they get in here, is we just want to get them to run. They're going to run a lot more than they ever have before. We're going to try to challenge the defense sideline to sideline, not just between the tackles. And it's a challenge to get guys to run but yet to still be as physical as anybody, so there's an element there that's not just lateral but it's getting downhill, too. It takes time to develop."

It's tough to call this a smokescreen bc of the commitment needed and Bill's M.O. I can't see them doing this to not do it later but I'm curious on just how much of a jump we make. I'm thinking we commit but take the slow & steady approach.

In terms of what you want out of your OL it's very simple. At least putting it on paper for an application. Short area quickness, agility and balance > everything else.

1)flexibility particularly in your lower half. You're asked to explode, reach, maneuver, take on contact and still make your way down field all while keeping your eyes & head on a swivel. flexibility is a must have. I'll add balance in with this one. Balance, contact balance is huge.

2)footwork. You can tell so much just off their first step(s) It's crucial for a successful zone blocking scheme bc at times everyone is taking the same steps, working through the same area. Footwork is a must have.

3)I feel like you could go a lot of different ways here. I want to say physicality bc it's big in a zone scheme (depending on the schemd you could have man principles on some stuff) but I'll go with vision. You're not just clearing bodies out the way or hitting something. You're working in space, trying to be efficient, effective and crisp. At times you're initiating contact off the line, tracking 2nd level defenders, trying to use space/leverage. I think I'd go with vision here although it's a tough call.

Guys like Shanahan squeeze water from rock in terms of maximizing the details. This type of attention to detail tends to spill over throughout the offense or team. Above, when talking about OL'm I think you could put chemistry, camaraderie #1 overall bc that's such huge part of guys being successful. You have different types of zone blocking. Numbers (sometimes man principles), filled/unfilled, so you've got to be able to communicate and be familiar with each other's tendencies.

We'll see how much and how quick we turn over but I'm not ignoring the obvious."


So I actually don't mind it, dont find it that hard to believe. Stevenson ran a lot of iz in college and Harris is pretty versatile in that regard. Strong is a nice back for stretch plays.

Wynn, Andrews and Strange are very athletic, agile and can do a lot of damage in space/2nd level.

It's really not that far fetch to say "hey we have the pieces in place" As I mentioned above though guys like Shanahan are who they are bc they can squeeze water from a rock in terms of details. We know Bill still can. I think its reasonable to assume guys like Judge and Matt should be as motivated as possible to get rid of some of the recent stain so there's that. And while guys like McDaniels and others are valuable it's Kyle that runs the show. This is an interesting angle though considering recent departures and arrivals.

Ive also been saying since last summer Mac should be running some RPO, use his legs occasionally/bootleg so I'd welcome more a little variety there. The NFL still can't defend the RPO mostly bc no one runs it so they don't practice for it enough. Mac has a little athleticism and awareness and was great at running it in college. Again I wouldn't mind more of that too while we're implementing different things.

I don't want to say its not a big deal, maybe just not shocking. Josh was a staple here. There's really not an established figure that can just step right in so change makes sense. I'm not against it. It's nice to be ahead of the curve. We've been the ones being imitated but we works.
I have not seen anyone here attempt put all the pieces together.

Just because Strong ran zone plays in college that did not necessarily mean that he would suddenly have the same plays in NE. It made far more sense to carry on the existing Pats offensive scheme with McDaniel's gone. Of course there needed to be improvement in 2022.

Confirmation of a new NE offense came from Bourne.
 
I hope things change from Bill's OLD schemes. The days of dinking and dunking for long SLOW moving drives is hopefully OVER.

Offense needs to become more EXPLOSIVE to compete w/ all the NEW era offenses. Why get all these young FAST players?
Right, the old way sucked!
 
I have not seen anyone here attempt put all the pieces together.
It's been mentioned and discussed in several different threads lol. Actually since draft night. The links you pasted & copied above have been discussed several times actually.

You're late to the party that's ok but again a thread is useful.

I just wish there was more insight and original thought than a few old links. If youre starting a thread on "offensive scheme" give us some good info and thought. Thats one of the problems around here but again give the people more than a few links. Come correct.
Just because Strong ran zone plays in college that did not necessarily mean that he would suddenly have the same plays in NE. It made far more sense to carry on the existing Pats offensive scheme with McDaniel's gone. Of course there needed to be improvement in 2022.
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Honestly asking what is your point here? Strong isn't a versatile back in terms of what blocking schemes will work for him. He's a strict zone runner so again maybe you can expand above.
Confirmation of a new NE offense came from Bourne.
Again you're wrong or behind here. Several different people have mentioned or alluded to this since draft night.
 
Not sure if the bolded is sarcasm but it's all anyone has been talking about lol. I suppose we needed a thread though, it's relevant for sure. Hopefully it's worthwhile that doesn't turn into something else by page 4. So I'll add this from my thread the other day ...

"Re: OZ / Stretch plays. Someone asked (@Vindicate ). I've been sick, just exhausted off work. Haven't been in here as much.

Did anything interesting happen in the last week????

Anyway I just wrote about Pierre Strong in another thread and a lot of what I said there applies to what you want out of a RB for OZ / Wide, stretch plays. He really has a lot of what you need and is well equipped for that specific role.

from the recap thread ....

"Hes got serious acceleration and fast twitch. Which after patience/setting up your blocks, is the most important thing for stretch plays, OZ imo. Basically has one gear but he gets to 0-100 real quick. Good long speed but he gets into top gear extremely fast. I mentioned it above but he's very good, very patient setting up his blocks and not just for stretch plays. Using them to his advantage to help shape the 2nd & 3rd levels. Its very subtle and tough to recognize but he does a nice job shaping the landscape to his liking. Having 4.3 speed doesn't hurt but the impressive part of that is that Strong is very good at keeping full speed while shifting, changing his path, weaving through defenders. One of the more impressive things about his game. He's got some nice COD at full speed. Not so much bounce around like Barry Sanders COD but a little shifting here & there, turning while keeping top speed."

What Shanahan said ...
"But the type of guys you want are guys who can put their foot in the ground, get downhill. You do want guys who can run and create arm tackles and then run through them. I'm not looking for a guy...that you have to give 30 carries to to get 100 yards. You want guys who get downhill, who get over four yards a carry and they move the chains for you."

So if you were to ask me what the most important attributes/qualities are for a RB in a zone scheme, specifically outside/wide zone I'd say the following ...

1)it takes a certain back to run this system but the OL are still the star of the show. The lanes and movement they create allow for for those big plays to develop. I remember always wondering why running backs won't simply bounce it outside when I first started watching ball. Seemed like the edge was there be taken. But the lateral speed even back then was incredible. You can't just win with pure speed 99% percent of the time. That lateral movement is a killer for some guys, combined with motion (hello TT?) it's that much more difficult. Getting those LB's moving east-west, hesitating for a half second, thinking instead of closing ground, leads to those big plays. Following your blocks, allowing OL to kick, climb and clear space, showing a little patience but not living off it. Is key.

2) decisiveness / vision - these are together at least imo bc one doesnt matter without the other. You could have the best vision in the world but without those instincts and decision making to make a move its useless. In general backs have more freedom to be flexible in a power scheme and depending on the blockers in front of them and their own athleticism, they might be afforded more patience overall. Zone runs, especially wide/stretch plays, require precise timing. Athleticism matters and obviously helps but your straight line speed and quick mater more than COD/3 Cone. Missing your lane while moving laterally is a quick death in the NFL. So you have to be decisive and have above average open field vision. You can't afford to be too patient, lanes close in a hurry. It's impossible to capture the edge on every wide run so at times you have to just take what's there. You're not always going to take the edge and scream down the sideline for 50. You have "aiming points" but cant just stick to the script for the sake every time. You need to generate positive yards.

In general amost every "aiming point" for a RB is their tackles midline/hip or their TE/"Ghost TE" hip. Those two obviously are usually near the perimeter so again not everything plays as planned. Depending on the emlos (end man on line of scrimmage), who's reached, whos not, what a defense is trying to do. Generally the plan is as follows ...

A)"bounce" take the outside if possible. No hesitation if there's a path outside you "bounce" it outside and take the most outside path you.

B)"bend" kick inside following your OL climbing to the LB.

C)"bang" generally same, looking for over pursuing defenders.

This is where you watch film and ask yourself was that oz? Was that duo or iz?

3)Acceleration/quick twitch. There's different types of speed and having quick twitch, real acceleration is key. Especially for this run. Everyone is fast. Having that burst, explosion is a lot more important than having "long speed", separation is king in this league.

There are other traits you want but those would be my most important for a RB in that scheme. Strong reminds me of a Shanahan type back in the mold of Brieda and Mosert.

I've noticed a few reporters and new players (Parker) talk about how much we're running in camp. Now it's important to remember the NEP are notorious for their strength and conditioning programs. There's a few a teams that are in extra good shape and the Pats have always been one of them. Nonetheless it reminded me of this quote from KS ...

"the main thing we're going to get these linemen, when they get in here, is we just want to get them to run. They're going to run a lot more than they ever have before. We're going to try to challenge the defense sideline to sideline, not just between the tackles. And it's a challenge to get guys to run but yet to still be as physical as anybody, so there's an element there that's not just lateral but it's getting downhill, too. It takes time to develop."

It's tough to call this a smokescreen bc of the commitment needed and Bill's M.O. I can't see them doing this to not do it later but I'm curious on just how much of a jump we make. I'm thinking we commit but take the slow & steady approach.

In terms of what you want out of your OL it's very simple. At least putting it on paper for an application. Short area quickness, agility and balance > everything else.

1)flexibility particularly in your lower half. You're asked to explode, reach, maneuver, take on contact and still make your way down field all while keeping your eyes & head on a swivel. flexibility is a must have. I'll add balance in with this one. Balance, contact balance is huge.

2)footwork. You can tell so much just off their first step(s) It's crucial for a successful zone blocking scheme bc at times everyone is taking the same steps, working through the same area. Footwork is a must have.

3)I feel like you could go a lot of different ways here. I want to say physicality bc it's big in a zone scheme (depending on the schemd you could have man principles on some stuff) but I'll go with vision. You're not just clearing bodies out the way or hitting something. You're working in space, trying to be efficient, effective and crisp. At times you're initiating contact off the line, tracking 2nd level defenders, trying to use space/leverage. I think I'd go with vision here although it's a tough call.

Guys like Shanahan squeeze water from rock in terms of maximizing the details. This type of attention to detail tends to spill over throughout the offense or team. Above, when talking about OL'm I think you could put chemistry, camaraderie #1 overall bc that's such huge part of guys being successful. You have different types of zone blocking. Numbers (sometimes man principles), filled/unfilled, so you've got to be able to communicate and be familiar with each other's tendencies.

We'll see how much and how quick we turn over but I'm not ignoring the obvious."


So I actually don't mind it, dont find it that hard to believe. Stevenson ran a lot of iz in college and Harris is pretty versatile in that regard. Strong is a nice back for stretch plays.

Wynn, Andrews and Strange are very athletic, agile and can do a lot of damage in space/2nd level.

It's really not that far fetch to say "hey we have the pieces in place" As I mentioned above though guys like Shanahan are who they are bc they can squeeze water from a rock in terms of details. We know Bill still can. I think its reasonable to assume guys like Judge and Matt should be as motivated as possible to get rid of some of the recent stain so there's that. And while guys like McDaniels and others are valuable it's Kyle that runs the show. This is an interesting angle though considering recent departures and arrivals.

Ive also been saying since last summer Mac should be running some RPO, use his legs occasionally/bootleg so I'd welcome more a little variety there. The NFL still can't defend the RPO mostly bc no one runs it so they don't practice for it enough. Mac has a little athleticism and awareness and was great at running it in college. Again I wouldn't mind more of that too while we're implementing different things.

I don't want to say its not a big deal, maybe just not shocking. Josh was a staple here. There's really not an established figure that can just step right in so change makes sense. I'm not against it. It's nice to be ahead of the curve. We've been the ones being imitated but we works.


************ BCG, this is a feature lmao. Thank you for the abundance of info, I'm digesting it rn!
 
It's been mentioned and discussed in several different threads lol. Actually since draft night. The links you pasted & copied above have been discussed several times actually.

You're late to the party that's ok but again a thread is useful.

I just wish there was more insight and original thought than a few old links. If youre starting a thread on "offensive scheme" give us some good info and thought. Thats one of the problems around here but again give the people more than a few links. Come correct.

I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Honestly asking what is your point here? Strong isn't a versatile back in terms of what blocking schemes will work for him. He's a strict zone runner so again maybe you can expand above.

Again you're wrong or behind here. Several different people have mentioned or alluded to this since draft night.
I'd like to expand on the top part. I'm a little confused about the Josh part.

"Just because Strong ran zone plays in college that did not necessarily mean that he would suddenly have the same plays in NE. It made far more sense to carry on the existing Pats offensive scheme with McDaniel's gone. Of course there needed to be improvement in 2022."

Anyway Strong is a specific runner meant for wide/stretch plays. So when you say ... "Just because Strong ran zone plays in college that did not necessarily mean that he would suddenly have the same plays in NE." I have to disagree. He's just not built for much else. Inconsistent elusiveness, he's not pushing a pile or breaking many tackles. By all accounts he's a very specific pick/RB. Obviously that's not all he'll do but he's a certain type of back.

Maybe you could elaborate on what you mean?
 
Mentioned this but Stevenson ran a lot of inside zone in college. Obviously vg in a gap system. Harris had the same capacity but is coming up on a contract. We have the backs to be a pretty versatile group. Same for OL.

The big test or jump is in the details though and even past that you literally just have to run it to develop chemistry and see who's capable where. That's probably my biggest concern. I think we have the personnel but it takes a good while to really perfect this.

Another guy that isn't getting mentioned enough is the other Harris. He's a typical pat back and more along what we're used to seeing back there. He's very capable.

We definitely have one of the best RB groups in the league though. Hopefully we can ride them to a SB this year bc I see us running it just the same more or less.
 
It's been mentioned and discussed in several different threads lol. Actually since draft night. The links you pasted & copied above have been discussed several times actually.
Zone was proposed by DRADA in the Strong thread.

Props to him for the foresight.
You're late to the party that's ok but again a thread is useful.

I see nothing from you in regards to a definitive Pats change of offensive scheme. If you have an admission to the fact that BB is switching the offense up I would love to see it.
I just wish there was more insight and original thought than a few old links.
For future reference I do not recycle other peoples opinions in regards to the Pats. I prefer to gather information and form my own own opinion. I care little who is offended.

Furthermore, I have never met any NE Pats draft picks or FAs. Nor have I spoken with their coaches both pee wee football, high school or college. I have never been to a single game in person to chart and scout said players. If others on this board choose to act as if they have all the answers so be it.
If youre starting a thread on "offensive scheme" give us some good info and thought. Thats one of the problems around here but again give the people more than a few links. Come correct.
I do not need your approval to start a thread. Just being blunt here.

My question is why you did not start a thread regarding this new zone offense?
I have no idea what you're trying to say here. Honestly asking what is your point here? Strong isn't a versatile back in terms of what blocking schemes will work for him. He's a strict zone runner so again maybe you can expand above.

Again you're wrong or behind here. Several different people have mentioned or alluded to this since draft night.

Bacon, draft night to Bourne telling us thar he is learning a new plays is months away.

If you knew back in April why did you not share your wisdom with us mere mortals?
 
If you knew back in April why did you not share your wisdom with us mere mortals?

I think that the clearest "tell" that something is going on was already there in March when they let Jak Johnson go to the Raiders. Of course, a lot of people then said he'd be replaced. But Jak says that they told him that they weren't going to use a player like him in the future and he hasn't been. (Don't say "Dalton Keene". Please don't say "Dalton Keene".)

The draft (Strong, Strange) looks like further evidence in the same direction. Evidence against, I'd say, is that, while an OC leaving is a reason to change scheme, it's much less likely unless there's a clear new person in charge. My conclusion is that there probably is, and it's neither Patricia nor Judge. Belichick wants to be the OC. Well, we'll see about that.
 
It's all about the Red Zone, stupid! We kicked alot of field goals last year. I'm sure we will be fine in between the 20's but Red Zone, no.
Smith and Agholor are busts for the money. Questions remain to me, will Parker/Hunter combo be our Red Zone guys and is Thorton the Home Run Receiver.
Lots of folks says Thorton doesn't see much playing time, that's awful to me and would disappoint me tremendously. Then there's also talk of a New offensive scheme being redesigned, oh boy, good luck Mac.
 


Patriots News 4-28, Draft Notes On Every Draft Pick
MORSE: A Closer Look at the Patriots Undrafted Free Agents
Five Thoughts on the Patriots Draft Picks: Overall, Wolf Played it Safe
2024 Patriots Undrafted Free Agents – FULL LIST
MORSE: Thoughts on Patriots Day 3 Draft Results
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots Head Coach Jerod Mayo Post-Draft Press Conference
2024 Patriots Draft Picks – FULL LIST
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots CB Marcellas Dial’s Conference Call with the New England Media
So Far, Patriots Wolf Playing It Smart Through Five Rounds
Wolf, Patriots Target Chemistry After Adding WR Baker
Back
Top