Brady6
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 15,641
- Reaction score
- 5,580
Hindsight is 100%. However, I agree that we had 2 major opportunities to bring in a wide receiver in the 2012 draft. Our choices in of Wilson and Bequette were pretty awful.
With regard to Gregory, it is precisely because we have McCourty that we do OK at safety with Gregory starting. However, I agree that we need to draft yet another safety to add to the kiddie corp (Harmon, Wilson, and Ebner).
The development of our DBs is concerning to me personally. You have a player in Tavon Wilson who flashed the ability to do several things as a rookie; he contributed 41 tackles, 4 interceptions, 2 fumble recoveries and 6 pass defends. He also according to Reiss who actually mentioned him in an article yesterday is well liked in the locker room and considered a team first player (quote and link below).
“Wilson's primary contributions now come on special teams and in the locker room, where it's clear that he's well-liked and a team-first player.”
Why Tavon Wilson is on the mind - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston
How is it that we’re unable to develop these players, I am not say Tavon Wilson was great as a rookie but he certainly contributed and the fact he has been on the field for less than 10 defensive snaps in his second year is mind boggling. You saw a enough in this player to draft him 48th overall, use him as #3 on your safety rotation as a rookie over players like Pat Chung and now he isn’t even seeing the field. What happened in the last 10-12 months that led to this?
I think Belichick is the greatest coach of all time, if there is ever something I question it is when he puts players so deeply into the dog house that it because detrimental to their development and eventually destroys any possibility of them becoming the player they could have been. So many posters, media members and fans refer to players like Wilson, Chung, Dowling, Butler Cunningham and other as BUSTS and the blame for that is always placed squarely on the player themselves but I don’t know if that’s true I think you have to hold the coaching staff accountable for this as well. These players all showed something in terms of capability that is why they were drafted that is why many of them saw the field a significant amount in year 1 of their careers and then they went into witness protection in future years. That is a problem in my mind, the development of young players needs to be the primary focus of all the positional coaches, banishing them to the dog house is not going to develop them and at the end of the day they still get paid the team is the one that wasted its resources and got minimal contributions in return.