2007 Coaching Staff

[tdw777]

Wow I had no idea that we had a OC last year. McD gets blamed for not adjusting when he technically wasn't even the OC. This is just great. Thank for the input.

Alright..I give up. I don't claim to be an expert..I am merely a fan. I'm not slamming McD..I just happen to agree with NEM's observation about Weiss vs McD.

 

[Tunescribe]

If BB ever left having Weis back as head coach and Romeo as defensive coordinator would be a pretty nice combo in my opinion. Of course, it will never happen that way ...

 

[PATSNUTme]

http://www.nfl.com/teams/stats/NE

Let me ask those who think McDaniels is a bad OC. Out of the 50-60 called plays per game, how many have to work before he is called an OK OC, not great, not excellent, but OK.

Is he allowed 10 bad play calls a game? 5? 8? And on the average, how many bad plays per game can be attributed to poor execution on the part of the players?

 

[Canada's #1 Pats Fan]

Let's shift focus here for a second - bring back Hufnagel as QB coach. Brady was happier than a sh_t house rat with him on the sideline becuase as Brady claimed at one point about Hufnagel "after a bad decision, I would come back to the sideline and he would say something like, I know why you did that" (as Hufnagel was once an ex-QB). He was QB coach for the SB win over the Eagles.

 

[mgteich]

I don't see any changes in our 2007 coaching staff, although personally I think we need at least one additional coach on the offensive side of the ball.

Pees and his team need no help or changes.

 

[Box_O_Rocks]

Let's shift focus here for a second - bring back Hufnagel as QB coach. Brady was happier than a sh_t house rat with him on the sideline becuase as Brady claimed at one point about Hufnagel "after a bad decision, I would come back to the sideline and he would say something like, I know why you did that" (as Hufnagel was once an ex-QB). He was QB coach for the SB win over the Eagles.

The Patriots' SB win over the Eagles, # XXXIX? That was Josh McDaniels.

 

[Digger44]

Pees just as good so far as Romeo.

This is an interesting statement. I wonder if Peese is or will be better than Romeo. Romeo had a better secondary than Peese. Peese has a better Dline and a much worse secondary. It does boil down to time. I think Peese will get a much better secondary next year if we can resign Asante. One of those 1st rounders needs to be used on a CB.

 

[MrBigglesWorth]

This is an interesting statement. I wonder if Peese is or will be better than Romeo. Romeo had a better secondary than Peese. Peese has a better Dline and a much worse secondary. It does boil down to time. I think Peese will get a much better secondary next year if we can resign Asante. One of those 1st rounders needs to be used on a CB.

Totally agree. Of the first three picks I pray that two are defense. Cornerback and linebacker preference.

 

[PATSNUTme]

http://www.nfl.com/teams/stats/NE

Let me ask those who think McDaniels is a bad OC. Out of the 50-60 called plays per game, how many have to work before he is called an OK OC, not great, not excellent, but OK.

Is he allowed 10 bad play calls a game? 5? 8? And on the average, how many bad plays per game can be attributed to poor execution on the part of the players?

Yes Nut, as soon as there as a direct question asked the McDaniels bashers seem to just disappear.

As I reply to myself because the bashers won't answer direct questions, they will just bash to make themseves look "smart", they think.

 

[Canada's #1 Pats Fan]

The Patriots' SB win over the Eagles, # XXXIX? That was Josh McDaniels.

My mistake, you are right - then it was the the previous Super Bowl win over the Panthers.

 

[Digger44]

Totally agree. Of the first three picks I pray that two are defense. Cornerback and linebacker preference.

I wouldn't have an issue with 2 CBs in #1 and spending $$$ on a proven LB or 2. I think we will draft a rb somewhere and dont forget 11 TEs

 

[MrBigglesWorth]

Yes Nut, as soon as there as a direct question asked the McDaniels bashers seem to just disappear.

As I reply to myself because the bashers won't answer direct questions, they will just bash to make themseves look "smart", they think.

I think it had to do more with overall game plan.

Since they switched to the spread formation the past two games from the power run I formation I think it's been more productive and whoever implimented that: McDaniels or BB or all the coaches....kudos to all of them.

Now I'm not sure if they did that to exploit a big slow team(Jags and Houston) and when they face Indy, San Diego, Cincy, or Denver that will change.

The past two games the opposition did not have a legit speed rusher so when they do face one will they revert to the power team they wanted to be earlier in the season. I hope not as the more they bunched things up the tougher it seemed to run.

I say spread a team out and run at them. And the pats need to figure out a way to use a teams overpursuit speed rush against them.

 

[MrBigglesWorth]

I wouldn't have an issue with 2 CBs in #1 and spending $$$ on a proven LB or 2. I think we will draft a rb somewhere and dont forget 11 TEs

yeah a FA lb would be nice and also use a #3 or comp pick on a linebacker.