MrNathanDrake
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2009
- Messages
- 2,898
- Reaction score
- 1,703
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
This team is certainly a bit deeper. Throw out WW/Moss and JE/Gronk who all cancel each other out. Then wash Faulk and Lewis too. Granted right now Lewis is giving you more as he is a huge weapon, Faulk did put up similar numbers several years and was a Special Team ace and elite blocker.
That leaves:
Watson VS Chandler Watson's numbers are better but SC is not the primary TE here.
Stallworth VS Lefell Stallworth is faster Lafell a better blocker and a bit more versitle
Gaffney VS Amendola JG more proven but DA not getting the same snaps. DA +ST ace
LoMO VS Blount Clear Advantage Blount in Run and Pass
Brady VS Williams Williams better blocker and hands just as good
Morris VS White White more 3rd down back.
Current team also has Dobson and Martin should they stay on the roster with Lafell back.
Look, I am a HUGE DA fan and was one of the few defending him in the dark days here.I disagree that Gaffney is "more proven" than Amendola.
So...advantage Gaffney?Bottom line, is that DA has gotten about the same amount of yards as Gaff in equal games. And a bit more yards per game overall.
Well that is the problem. I never gave Gaff the edge and in fact mentioned in another thread that the reason that the 15 team is deeper than the 07 team is BECAUSE of DA.So...advantage Gaffney?
I don't mean to quibble on this point, but Gaffney was fine, certainly nothing clutch or special.
You are misreading me backing my claim that Gaff was a bit more reliable and proven as a guy game in and game out, year after year - that you could use as a main WR. That dosent mean he gets an advantage of a more explosive and much more versatile slot receiver.So...advantage Gaffney?
I don't mean to quibble on this point, but Gaffney was fine, certainly nothing clutch or special.
An arguably tough choice, but I'd go with Moss/Welker ca. 2007.
This seems right to me.This team is certainly a bit deeper. Throw out WW/Moss and JE/Gronk who all cancel each other out. Then wash Faulk and Lewis too. Granted right now Lewis is giving you more as he is a huge weapon, Faulk did put up similar numbers several years and was a Special Team ace and elite blocker.
That leaves:
Watson VS Chandler Watson's numbers are better but SC is not the primary TE here.
Stallworth VS Lefell Stallworth is faster Lafell a better blocker and a bit more versitle
Gaffney VS Amendola JG more proven but DA not getting the same snaps. DA +ST ace
LoMO VS Blount Clear Advantage Blount in Run and Pass
Brady VS Williams Williams better blocker and hands just as good
Morris VS White White more 3rd down back.
Current team also has Dobson and Martin should they stay on the roster with Lafell back.
This seems right to me.
Morris blows away White, though. Vastly superior player.
Yeah he is just a 3rd down guy, really just a backup to Lewis who would be a lot less effective. Good problem to have when you have to go down that far to find an advantage that the 07 team had depth wise.No question there. I don't know that White can do anything, yet.
I think people forget how good Welker was...and tend to selectively remember a couple of drops instead of the consistency he brought week-in-week-out.
, Welker would have not survived that Chancellor hit in the last drive in last year's SB.