- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,324
- Reaction score
- 105,267
It hurt but I think losing Faulk was more damaging.I wish that Neal hadn't been injured in the '07 SB; I would like to have seen how the outcome
might've changed, if at all.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It hurt but I think losing Faulk was more damaging.I wish that Neal hadn't been injured in the '07 SB; I would like to have seen how the outcome
might've changed, if at all.
Dan Connolly exemplified everything our program requires of players,” Belichick said. “He was tough and dependable, smart and team-oriented, and his work ethic ensured he improved on an annual basis to reach his potential.
From where his career began as a developmental player to where it finished as a team leader and champion, Dan Connolly was a player I was proud to coach.”
When was Faulk lost?It hurt but I think losing Faulk was more damaging.
Start of the 2nd 1/2. Had a knee or an ankle IIRC.When was Faulk lost?
It hurt but I think losing Faulk was more damaging.
Add in Kyle Brady as well. Your only blocking TE, your best blocking/receiving back and a pro bowl level guard when depth on the line was thin. There goes your max protect, just when an injured Brady needed it most.