PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

List of discrepancies in or with the wells report.


Status
Not open for further replies.
This is like Wells doing some science that proves Global Warming is real, but also shows that the Earth was no longer capable of being lived on for the last 10 years... You can't whip up some math, cherry pick the results you want to fit your argument, and ignore the results that disallow the entire thing.
 
Thats all it should have come down to right there.

The Patriot footballs were .3 psi lower than the Colts on average (though again, 11 footballs versus 4).

Is a .3 psi variance enough to infer human intervention?

We really are going to conclude that McNally went into that bathroom and deflated 11 footballs by .3 psi? Really?

Really?


EDIT:
In fact, isn't .3 just about the psi a football loses when it is tested ?

Did Wells even look into the possibility that the Patriot footballs were simply tested one time more than the Colts?


Yes they did. They have measured pressure loss over multiple readings. But either way their own math explains the possibility that the Pats balls would have measured as they did except they think because of the text messages it is plausible that they tampered with them. Weather + temperature change + gauge discrepancies = plausible innocence in my mind.
 
The whole report is a discrepancy. And it can be summed up by one question. If the Wells report was being done to protect the "integrity of the NFL", then when is Goddell going to ask for an investigation into the Refs deliberately overinflating a Pats gameball against the Jets earlier in the season? If that is not done, then one would have to conclude the NFL disagrees with it findings. You cant claim the text messages in this report as evidence enough to discipline Brady and not use these same texts where they claim the referees overinflated a gameball to well above the regulations specified in the NFL rules. Someone can easily claim the Refs did this to give the Pats a disadvantage. You cant have it both ways.
 
I have stated that the report pumps up Walt Anderson for his attention to detail to use his recollections of the PSI levels before the game and the goings on before the game and later states Anderson couldn't remember if he signed K Ball 1. He remember the PSI for 24 balls, but not if he signed all the balls?

Also, why was the intercepted ball never gauged? And why has no one in the media questioned this?

Why was anything remotely damaging or questionable about the league put in footnotes which are less likely to be read?
 
Why was anything remotely damaging or questionable about the league put in footnotes which are less likely to be read?

You answered your own question. It is a common tactic used to make reports sound a certain way.
 
In their "scientific" study of footballs under game conditions, they simulated the effect of rain by spritzing the balls once every 15 minutes with a "household spray bottle" for the two hour length of the first half. This showed a significant impact on inflation. Did it really capture the full impact of rain during the game and a very wet field?
 
Was waiting for the league stats for NFL psi levels of all games during 2014-15 season to compare to Pats levels. Oh there is no such thing. Even during a game that ball psi was suspicious no written log. Nothing else means dipsh@t, as we can see how important psi is, ball security etc. Now GFU's
 
Not sure this fits in this thread or not, but I have been looking for confirmation that the NFLPA advised players not to release their phones and message streams during investigations (from the time of Bountygate if memory serves me well). If this indeed is the case, then Brady is only following NFLPA advised procedure, and not stonewalling the investigation as the report infers.

The main criticism of Brady is that he lied about knowing McNally, however the context of both question and his answer are not recorded in the report as far as I know. There is no direct contact between the two, since Jastremski appears to be the go-between. As such Brady would not know him as a person, though he might know him as an employee, and even then might not recognize his surname. He might only know him as old Jim, JM, Mac or Jimmy the Squid

Finally the phrase "generally aware" is an opinion, not a fact. It is based on hearsay with no context indicating commission, sanction or awareness of post inspection activities.
 
Another discrepancy in the report is that Wells states that the initial suspicion that the Pats were using deflated balls came from the regular season game against the Colts. Except that game was in Indy and McNally wasn't there as he only works the Pats home games. He didn't even bother trying to explain that.
 
As has been pointed out, McNally was complaining that he doesnt receive gifts from Brady even on Christmas.

Doesn't this strongly indicate that Brady didn't know him?
 
Wells report page 7: On the sideline, Colts equipment personnel used a pressure gauge to measure the inflation level of the ball, determined that it was below the minimum 12.5 psi level and informed a game official and other NFL personnel.

That is a violation.Nobody but a ref can check ball pressure, EVER.​

Page 9: Our consultants confirmed that a reduction in air pressure is a natural result of footballs moving from a relatively warm environment such as a locker room to a colder environment such as a playing field.

This should be bold and in 24 point font, because people still don’t GET IT.

Page 10: Exponent also concluded that the difference in the magnitude of the reduction in air pressure between the Patriots and Colts footballs based on the halftime measurements is statistically significant. Dr. Marlow agreed with Exponent‟s conclusions.

4 Colts footballs is not enough sample size to justify that conclusion. Compare them to the first 4, last 4, or middle 4 Patriots balls and you get different answers.​

Page 11: Colts footballs and the Colts halftime measurements were used as a “control” group because there was no plausible basis on which to believe there had been tampering with the Colts balls.

Why assume that? The Colts balls were also tested just before 13-minute halftime was OVER, when they had been in the heated room for 10 minutes.​

Page 12: Exponent concluded that the average pressures recorded for the Patriots game balls during halftime of the AFC Championship Game were lower than the lowest average pressures attained by the simulations. In other words, when tests were run using the most likely game-day conditions and circumstances, the Patriots halftime measurements could not be replicated, and the pressures observed for the Patriots footballs by Exponent during its experiments were all higher

Nobody else sees that, at all. Grade schoolers have done the experiment.​

Page 16: Counsel for the Patriots also contended that the text messages between McNally and Jastremski referring to the inflation levels of footballs and related topics were not serious and should be seen as nothing more than attempts at humor and hyperbole. We also find these claims not plausible.

Because you don’t want to?​

Pages 18-20: a big deal is made of an “increase in the frequency of text and telephone communications between Jastremski and Brady post-game”

No %$%#. Somebody was accusing them of cheating. It was leading the world news coverage on CNN. Wouldn’t you be talking to each other about what the F is going on?​

Page 21: At various points in the investigation, counsel for the Patriots questioned the integrity and objectivity of game officials, various NFL executives and certain NFL Security representatives present at the AFC Championship Game or otherwise involved in the investigative process. We found no evidence to substantiate the questions raised by counsel. Specifically, we identified no evidence of any bias or unfairness. We believe that the game officials, NFL executives, NFL Security representatives and other members of the NFL staff who participated in the testing of the footballs and the subsequent investigative process acted fairly, properly and responsibly.

LOL… blind!​

Page 46, footnote: Because Sullivan‟s email did not provide specific factual support for the Colts’ concerns, NFL officials determined that it was not necessary to ask the game officials preemptively to check the air pressure in the Patriots game balls during the game, as Sullivan had requested. They reported during interviews that, without additional specific information that might raise further concern, they believed that the referee’s standard pregame inspection of the game balls would be sufficient, and that a change in the standard inspection protocols was not necessary. In particular, prior to the game, there was no plan to check the air pressure of the balls at halftime or any other time during the game. There was no “sting” operation, no plan for a “sting” operation and no discussion of a “sting” operation.

Why did they not ask Grigson what the hell he meant by it being “well known” that the Patriots deflate game balls?​

Page 46: They also cited unspecified chatter throughout the League that the Patriots prefer their footballs softer than other teams and that visiting teams should be on guard when playing at Gillette Stadium. They could not identify a specific source for this information or reference particular conversations.

Why could they not identify a source? Is that a hard question?​

Page 52: Although Anderson‟s best recollection is that he used the Logo Gauge, he said that it is certainly possible that he used the Non-Logo Gauge… we believe it is more probable that Anderson used the Non-Logo Gauge for his pre-game measurements.

Yes, we will choose to disbelieve an official, if it helps our story!​

Page 59: He also claimed that he went into the bathroom with the game balls because when he got to the end of the tunnel, he realized that he suddenly had to use the bathroom.

LOL, wow, sketchy, huh?​

Page 59: He said that on the day of the AFC Championship Game, he entered the bathroom, dropped the ball bags to his left, and used the urinal to his right. That bathroom, however, does not contain a urinal. Upon further questioning, McNally claimed that he did not pay attention to what type of fixture he used.

LOL, would you necessarily recall where it was that you took a pee?​

Page 63: Following the interception upon reaching the sideline, Jackson handed the ball to David Thornton, the Colts Director of Player Engagement, near the Colts bench and Thornton immediately handed the ball to Assistant Equipment Manager Brian Seabrooks. According to Seabrooks, he believed that the ball felt similar to the footballs intercepted by Mike Adams during the Colts game against the Patriots earlier in the season, so he asked one of the team‟s equipment interns to locate a pressure gauge and test the inflation level of the intercepted ball. The intern used a digital pressure gauge similar to the gauge used by the Colts to set their footballs before the game, and reported that the pressure measured approximately 11 psi. Seabrooks then walked with the intercepted football to Equipment Manager Sean Sullivan, who squeezed the ball and agreed that it felt soft.

This is ILLEGAL. Nobody but a ref can check ball pressure, EVER.​

Page 69: Exponent believes that the results recorded for the third Colts ball tested reflect an anomaly in that, unlike the other Colts balls tested, the reading made by Prioleau is higher than the reading made by Blakeman. Exponent believes that this anomaly may be the result of a transcription error where the measurements recorded were attributed to the opposite game official (i.e., on game day, Blakeman measured 12.95 psi and Prioleau measured 12.50 psi) or a recording error where the pressure measured by

So, the numbers don’t fit your story, you “correct” the numbers in the analysis. Yeah, right…​

Page 89: Jastremski also has received various items of value from Brady, including in the months before the AFC Championship Game

If you worked for the Patriots, would you think it’s wrong to ask multimillionaire players to autograph stuff for you or to give you a tip around the holidays for your hard work?​


That’s through 90 pages… somebody else can take over from here….
 
This isn't really a discrepancy but it bothers me: The Exponent report is dated the same as the Wells Report. This suggests to me that the company was acting in tandem with the issuer of the report and not "independently" as claimed. Otherwise, how would Exponent know when the report would be released? Most professional studies date the report when they publish it. The dating of the report suggests that drafts of the report were issued and the recipient of the report was allowed to offer feedback prior to the finalization.
 
Page 69: "The officials also inflated and re-adjusted each of the Patriots game balls tested.Riveron instructed that footballs registering below the permissible range should be inflated and set to 13.0 psi."

When four Patriots footballs were tested after the game, two of them were above 13.0 psi, despite having been out in the cold and rain for at least 90 minutes. The other two footballs were at 12.95 psi.
 
Missing line of inquiry:

Officials said (and supposed investigator has no interest in questioning it) that they "only had time" to test 4 Colts balls.

Think about it: The officials have a lot of reason to make **** up. The league has an interest in having some "probable" claim against the Pats. There are interests all over the place in only using 4 balls in the sample - and who's to contradict it, right?

Except you have that inconvenient table showing only 4 "control group" footballs.

And nobody asked any questions?

Most of this report doesn't rest on physical evidence. The evidence it does rest on is flawed eight ways from Sunday - this is just one example.

The report writer just says "... cuz they didn't have time," and that's that. No questions? Just took their word for it?

Or wait, this is a good excuse... we didn't have time to ask them, we only had 103 days. We had to figure out how to pick the texts we imagine are the most "damning."

Disregarded line of Inquiry #2:

The Wells report evidently takes Jastremski and McNally (did I get them right?) as being utterly in earnest in every word of their text exchanges -- and adds a gloss of interpretation.

However, the very texts they claim are "evidence" note that J measured the balls the next morning, and they were 16 PSI.

If J and M can gauge a ball to cheat, they can gauge a ball to see a ref cheat.

No line of inquiry on how the balls "more probably than not" got to be 16 PSI - 2.5 PSI above the top of the range.
 
Wells report page 7: On the sideline, Colts equipment personnel used a pressure gauge to measure the inflation level of the ball, determined that it was below the minimum 12.5 psi level and informed a game official and other NFL personnel.

That is a violation.Nobody but a ref can check ball pressure, EVER.

Page 9: Our consultants confirmed that a reduction in air pressure is a natural result of footballs moving from a relatively warm environment such as a locker room to a colder environment such as a playing field.

This should be bold and in 24 point font, because people still don’t GET IT.

Page 10: Exponent also concluded that the difference in the magnitude of the reduction in air pressure between the Patriots and Colts footballs based on the halftime measurements is statistically significant. Dr. Marlow agreed with Exponent‟s conclusions.

4 Colts footballs is not enough sample size to justify that conclusion. Compare them to the first 4, last 4, or middle 4 Patriots balls and you get different answers.

Page 11: Colts footballs and the Colts halftime measurements were used as a “control” group because there was no plausible basis on which to believe there had been tampering with the Colts balls.

Why assume that? The Colts balls were also tested just before 13-minute halftime was OVER, when they had been in the heated room for 10 minutes.

Page 12: Exponent concluded that the average pressures recorded for the Patriots game balls during halftime of the AFC Championship Game were lower than the lowest average pressures attained by the simulations. In other words, when tests were run using the most likely game-day conditions and circumstances, the Patriots halftime measurements could not be replicated, and the pressures observed for the Patriots footballs by Exponent during its experiments were all higher

Nobody else sees that, at all. Grade schoolers have done the experiment.

Page 16: Counsel for the Patriots also contended that the text messages between McNally and Jastremski referring to the inflation levels of footballs and related topics were not serious and should be seen as nothing more than attempts at humor and hyperbole. We also find these claims not plausible.

Because you don’t want to?

Pages 18-20: a big deal is made of an “increase in the frequency of text and telephone communications between Jastremski and Brady post-game”

No %$%#. Somebody was accusing them of cheating. It was leading the world news coverage on CNN. Wouldn’t you be talking to each other about what the F is going on?

Page 21: At various points in the investigation, counsel for the Patriots questioned the integrity and objectivity of game officials, various NFL executives and certain NFL Security representatives present at the AFC Championship Game or otherwise involved in the investigative process. We found no evidence to substantiate the questions raised by counsel. Specifically, we identified no evidence of any bias or unfairness. We believe that the game officials, NFL executives, NFL Security representatives and other members of the NFL staff who participated in the testing of the footballs and the subsequent investigative process acted fairly, properly and responsibly.

LOL… blind!

Page 46, footnote: Because Sullivan‟s email did not provide specific factual support for the Colts’ concerns, NFL officials determined that it was not necessary to ask the game officials preemptively to check the air pressure in the Patriots game balls during the game, as Sullivan had requested. They reported during interviews that, without additional specific information that might raise further concern, they believed that the referee’s standard pregame inspection of the game balls would be sufficient, and that a change in the standard inspection protocols was not necessary. In particular, prior to the game, there was no plan to check the air pressure of the balls at halftime or any other time during the game. There was no “sting” operation, no plan for a “sting” operation and no discussion of a “sting” operation.

Why did they not ask Grigson what the hell he meant by it being “well known” that the Patriots deflate game balls?

Page 46: They also cited unspecified chatter throughout the League that the Patriots prefer their footballs softer than other teams and that visiting teams should be on guard when playing at Gillette Stadium. They could not identify a specific source for this information or reference particular conversations.

Why could they not identify a source? Is that a hard question?

Page 52: Although Anderson‟s best recollection is that he used the Logo Gauge, he said that it is certainly possible that he used the Non-Logo Gauge… we believe it is more probable that Anderson used the Non-Logo Gauge for his pre-game measurements.

Yes, we will choose to disbelieve an official, if it helps our story!

Page 59: He also claimed that he went into the bathroom with the game balls because when he got to the end of the tunnel, he realized that he suddenly had to use the bathroom.

LOL, wow, sketchy, huh?

Page 59: He said that on the day of the AFC Championship Game, he entered the bathroom, dropped the ball bags to his left, and used the urinal to his right. That bathroom, however, does not contain a urinal. Upon further questioning, McNally claimed that he did not pay attention to what type of fixture he used.

LOL, would you necessarily recall where it was that you took a pee?

Page 63: Following the interception upon reaching the sideline, Jackson handed the ball to David Thornton, the Colts Director of Player Engagement, near the Colts bench and Thornton immediately handed the ball to Assistant Equipment Manager Brian Seabrooks. According to Seabrooks, he believed that the ball felt similar to the footballs intercepted by Mike Adams during the Colts game against the Patriots earlier in the season, so he asked one of the team‟s equipment interns to locate a pressure gauge and test the inflation level of the intercepted ball. The intern used a digital pressure gauge similar to the gauge used by the Colts to set their footballs before the game, and reported that the pressure measured approximately 11 psi. Seabrooks then walked with the intercepted football to Equipment Manager Sean Sullivan, who squeezed the ball and agreed that it felt soft.

This is ILLEGAL. Nobody but a ref can check ball pressure, EVER.

Page 69: Exponent believes that the results recorded for the third Colts ball tested reflect an anomaly in that, unlike the other Colts balls tested, the reading made by Prioleau is higher than the reading made by Blakeman. Exponent believes that this anomaly may be the result of a transcription error where the measurements recorded were attributed to the opposite game official (i.e., on game day, Blakeman measured 12.95 psi and Prioleau measured 12.50 psi) or a recording error where the pressure measured by

So, the numbers don’t fit your story, you “correct” the numbers in the analysis. Yeah, right…

Page 89: Jastremski also has received various items of value from Brady, including in the months before the AFC Championship Game

If you worked for the Patriots, would you think it’s wrong to ask multimillionaire players to autograph stuff for you or to give you a tip around the holidays for your hard work?


That’s through 90 pages… somebody else can take over from here….

That is fantastic work.
 
11) The company relied upon for scientific data is about as disreputable as they come. Doesn't mean they are wrong, but it means it isn't reliable.
They give you what you pay for, whether it is the cigarette industry telling us that second hand smoke doesn't cause cancer or supporting a paper industry that asbestos is safe....
 
11) The company relied upon for scientific data is about as disreputable as they come. Doesn't mean they are wrong, but it means it isn't reliable.

12) The fact that the report goes out of its way to ignore factual data about league mismanagement.


Exponent is a company whose objective is to produce a desirable result an not to get to the bottom of something
 
Maybe just a minor point, but all of the anti-Pats agenda seems to have been blamed on BB's arrogance, yet BB isn't implicated at all in this, and the vitriol is as vicious as ever.

It has always been resentment of the Pats' success in general.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Patriots QB Drake Maye Conference Call
Patriots Now Have to Get to Work After Taking Maye
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf and Jerod Mayo After Patriots Take Drake Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Back
Top