So let's assess all 3 of the picks. I didn't see the Detroit game. Gronk at Indy. Happened because Tom COULDNT step into his throw. Back foot lob. NOT a bad decision because Gronk was open. Bad execution from oline and Tom forced the pick. Get a pass imo
Chargers game. Again Gronk wide open. Oline fails to get rusher. Tom has to rush his throw. Brady then can't get his mechanics right, throws the pick. Again it was a result that was initiated by the offensive line. Not Brady. Again a GREAT decision, not executed fully
This last pick. Oline does well. But in a game where Brady throws 50 times, and has one pick that was a result of a bad throw. Sucks, but it happens. Don't want bad throws to happen in the playoffs, but we're all human. Again GOOD decision as Gronk was open, bad execution.
Finally, this game was won BECAUSE of Tom Brady and not in SPITE of Tom Brady. I think maybe a healthy Rodgers would be the only qb that could have done what Tom Brady did that day. I think Brady had 3 bad throws all that night, out of 50. That's 6% of his throws. Say the pats had a balanced attack and Brady threw 31 times. That isn't even 2 bad throws in a game and we are moaning about 3?
What has happened at the end of halfs have been execution problems. Not bad decision problems by Brady. I know it comes off sounding like I am defending Brady to my grave, but he did about as well as you could hope given the oline and Baltimores strength. Brady would have been a minuscule reason as to why we lost and is probably the biggest reason we are in the AFCCG.
To sum it up, had the pats lost given Brady's performance, it would have fallen on the defense AGAIN. Brady had to match Baltimore blow for blow most of the game, until the defense got some stops.