SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Not 100% yes, but the voting on this and the other questions was better than I expected (not crapping badly on the Patriots).
We're talking about what Goodell actually said, not what I think he believes.
Also, I don't necessarily disbelieve the coaching thing. Why else would Walsh keep the tapes for 7 years, and then even when Spygate broke, the media had to come to him, not the other way around. This isn't really relevant to anything, but still.
Schlereth's reasoning is incredible! He said that because Matt Walsh may have knowingly acted against the rules that NOW THAT'S THE BASIS TO DISBELIEVE ANYTHING HE SAYS because Walsh is that type of person, therefore, of course, you can't believe it when Walsh says the tapes were not used during the game!!!
Say what?! This is sureal.
Schlereth's reasoning is incredible! He said that because Matt Walsh may have knowingly acted against the rules that NOW THAT'S THE BASIS TO DISBELIEVE ANYTHING HE SAYS because Walsh is that type of person, therefore, of course, you can't believe it when Walsh says the tapes were not used during the game!!!
Say what?! This is sureal.
Where is the FootballFanetic?
We're talking about what Goodell actually said, not what I think he believes.
Also, I don't necessarily disbelieve the coaching thing. Why else would Walsh keep the tapes for 7 years, and then even when Spygate broke, the media had to come to him, not the other way around. This isn't really relevant to anything, but still.
The only thing that concerned me, and it was very very slightly concerning, is that according to Goodell, Walsh admitted the Pats did try to hide their camermen to a small degree.
But this is offset by Herm waiving at the camera, the camerman wearing Patriots apparel, and the obvious knowledge from other coaches that this was going on. If other coaches felt that this was a big deal, why didn't this come out earlier?
Felger just said that the Patriots had evidence of other teams doing it. And nobody says boo. Why?
What is Felger's support for making this statement? Where is he getting this?
What is Felger's support for making this statement? Where is he getting this?
This is false. The rule didn't change in 2006. A memo was sent out to emphasize to teams to stop taping from the sidelines and reminding them that there were only specific places that teams could tape from.
According to an email reply I got from Mike Reiss during the SB, the RULE has been in there for ages. Its not new.
What Mike's reply told me, indirectly, was that it was similar to the chuck rule. That the rule about taping from the sidelines has been there for a long time, but its just not been enforced. Just like with the chuck rule where the Officials were lax in calling it.
I'm interested in Walsh meeting with Specter.