Re: Andy Reid:Randy was always going to go back to the Patriots
We aren t talking about Oakland, we've made that very clear. If you're using what you saw from him in Oakland as an accurate representation of what he did in Minnesota, thats your first mistake. Your second mistake is making broad inaccurate statements like Chris Carter saying Moss was a problem when in fact he never said that and was a big defender of Moss. Trust me, there isnt a player I followed more closely than Moss in Minnesota, I was living there at the time. If you want to me to go into detail, I can. Now if you want to comment on his Oakland tenure, fine..but if you want to somehow claim his time in Minnesota was cancerous, then make sure you have actual examples to back it up because the numbers are already against you.
As a San Diego fan I watched him BOTH years in Oakland. He was a cancer. As for your contention that everyone loved him I don't agree and there's no way to prove it. I remember Chris Carter, his personal chaperone Randy's first year, saying he was a problem. Whatever. All you need to do to see my side of it is to look at what the Patriots got him for, what? A fourth round pick. If he wasn't what I say how do you explain it with his stats (that you say make him the best ever after his first 6 years)? Why didn't Minnesota take him back for a fourth or third or second when they had traded him for a number one just two years earlier? But whatever. We disagree. It's been a great discussion.
pao
We aren t talking about Oakland, we've made that very clear. If you're using what you saw from him in Oakland as an accurate representation of what he did in Minnesota, thats your first mistake. Your second mistake is making broad inaccurate statements like Chris Carter saying Moss was a problem when in fact he never said that and was a big defender of Moss. Trust me, there isnt a player I followed more closely than Moss in Minnesota, I was living there at the time. If you want to me to go into detail, I can. Now if you want to comment on his Oakland tenure, fine..but if you want to somehow claim his time in Minnesota was cancerous, then make sure you have actual examples to back it up because the numbers are already against you.