Steve102
Any Man Who Must Say I Am The King Is No True King
PatsFans.com Supporter
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- May 16, 2008
- Messages
- 8,840
- Reaction score
- 15,088
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You're welcome And thanks @Joker for unpacking Shroedinger's BoBYour post really got me curious.
Now my hands are glowing fluorescent yellow and my cat (only remaining friend on earth) is dead after violent seizures and vomiting. I wish I had walked through the experiment before presenting it to my kids. Mr. Whiskers was everything to them.
Thanks *******.
I really am looking forward to Douglas. Something about him screams the next Edelman... Him and Thornton are what I want to see. I honestly think we shouldn't jump on DeAndre unless our cap hit is maybe 3 -4 million over parkers hit.
Absolutely agree! Seeing the real Mac , closer to his rookie form possibly even better. With experience under his belt good and bad obviously.Hyped to see a better Mac Jones... Year 3... He went thru the crucible last year, and now we get to see if he's the type if player who is going to put this team on his back when needed...
stoked to see this rookie class in action... after last years home run, could we have strung together two years in a row of quality players... there will be misses, there always are, but get a few decent guys every year, and thats a win...
Super Hyped to see Brady being honored by the team this year. Thats a fitting end to the Brady years, not some rancorous divorce that lasts for a decade or more.
I'm with you! Really excited on defense.. this is a prove it or loose it year for barmore going forward. The guy is a absolutely force. But needs to stay on the field to be impactful and be the force the team needs him to be. My feelings are we can be a top 10 offense and top 10 defense.. that usually is conducive to winning!Defense.
I’m excited to see just how good the D can be. It was good last year and looks like it could be much improved over an already good unit. Looking to see if Keion can be a good complement to Barmore, where Mapu ends up playing (probably different on every play), how Gonzo does, whether Bolden is a surprise find, etc.
Real: Top 10 Offense with a D-Hop not without he would make Juju and our TE's way more effective inside.I'm with you! Really excited on defense.. this is a prove it or loose it year for barmore going forward. The guy is a absolutely force. But needs to stay on the field to be impactful and be the force the team needs him to be. My feelings are we can be a top 10 offense and top 10 defense.. that usually is conducive to winning!
PatsFan2:Real: Top 10 Offense with a D-Hop not without he would make Juju and our TE's way more effective inside.
you have to explain the Schroedinger's BOB point you are making...especially to the perennial doom and gloomers who see poison and death around every corner of this new season...
In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's BOB is a thought experiment that illustrates a paradox of quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical BOB may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This thought experiment was devised by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935[1] in a discussion with Albert Einstein[2] to illustrate what Schrödinger saw as the problems of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.
In Schrödinger's original formulation, BOB, a flask of poison, and a radioactive source are placed in a sealed box. If an internal monitor (e.g. a Geiger counter) detects radioactivity (i.e. a single atom decaying), the flask is shattered, releasing the poison, which kills BOB. The Copenhagen interpretation implies that, after a while, BOB is simultaneously alive and dead. Yet, when one looks in the box, one sees BOB either alive or dead, not both alive and dead. This poses the question of when exactly quantum superposition ends and reality resolves into one possibility or the other.
been listening to the inane yakking of sportstalk radio
The support group is Patsfans.com.I think there's a support group for this, or perhaps a 10 step program. Get help, man, for God's sake.
There is probably no one better in all of sports at putting the previous season or the past behind them than Bill.Bill Belichick is the Greatest Coach of All Time. Only idiots would dispute that. On the other hand, he is 71 years old and last season may have been his worst coaching season ever. At the beginning of the year he said: if it doesn't work, blame me. Well, I think that we know what happened on offense. And, by the way, the special teams cost them games too.
So I want to know if BB can put last year behind him and bring the team together.
In favour: he's a surpassingly knowledgeable coach, is amazingly good at learning, still loves coaching and is at his best when he's trying to prove people wrong.
Against: he has a very military mind-set (chain of command, don't question authority, even when it seems to be screwing up) and he doesn't have the older generation (Scarnecchia, Fears, but, above all, Ernie Adams) who could challenge him on a basis of equality. And he seems to want to punish those who did challenge the cl*sterf*ck that was last season (Hoyer, Harris, Meyers, Bailey, J. Jones).
Yea it is called "switching to Pandora", which I usually after listening to the never ending bytching about the Pats..I think there's a support group for this, or perhaps a 10 step program. Get help, man, for God's sake.
Look, if you were churlishly chugging toward said degree at one [masters/2 years,] while the Patriots careened toward opening day at an approximate rate of one jettisoned binkie per month, and reality was setting in at... oh never mind, it's not like I'm some kind of Mona Lisa Vito of spacetimeSo it isn't obvious how this applies to the Pats' upcoming season? Does he need to explain it to us as if we are a bunch of naïve first year physics Masters' students?