PatsBoy12
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 16,502
- Reaction score
- 10,026
The way I see it, and maybe I'm wrong, there's very few things that High does that Collins can't do or doesn't do already. Can the same really be said conversely? Can High do everything that Collins can do? I don't think so. Again, I want to make it clear that I want BOTH guys. But removing feelings and just trying to be as objective as I can be, High is the more replaceable of the two.
To the poster who mentioned Tedy B. in comparison to High...you're absolutely right. But that there strengthens my argument a bit as far as on the field type of player. High is your thumper. He's the guy you want in the game if you are facing a Lynch type, for instance. But how many of those guys exist truly? This is a pass first league now and you need LB's who can move in space, cover large amounts of field quickly and cover RB's and TE's. High does a little of all of those things (really improved in ideas coverage since entering the league), but not like Collins. Neither is particularly great in man coverage to be fair, though is evident they've worked on it. Anyway, did you see what Collins was doing on Thursday night. He was literally everywhere - INT for a TD, plays in the backfield, pressuring the QB. I don't know. I see more there than High. I think High is much closer to his plateau than Collins. But I'm just a coach at home in front of my TV.
To the poster who mentioned Tedy B. in comparison to High...you're absolutely right. But that there strengthens my argument a bit as far as on the field type of player. High is your thumper. He's the guy you want in the game if you are facing a Lynch type, for instance. But how many of those guys exist truly? This is a pass first league now and you need LB's who can move in space, cover large amounts of field quickly and cover RB's and TE's. High does a little of all of those things (really improved in ideas coverage since entering the league), but not like Collins. Neither is particularly great in man coverage to be fair, though is evident they've worked on it. Anyway, did you see what Collins was doing on Thursday night. He was literally everywhere - INT for a TD, plays in the backfield, pressuring the QB. I don't know. I see more there than High. I think High is much closer to his plateau than Collins. But I'm just a coach at home in front of my TV.