I have no idea of what the specific background of YOUGOTMOSSED is. Generalizing any profession - lawyers, doctors, police, military or otherwise (with their own ethical/professional standards) - is ridiculous and ignorant. If you spend any time on this planet, then understand there are good and bad people, honorable and dishonorable, in every profession (including your own, if you have a profession). I have seen all types in actual practice in real courts. If you haven't met these people in fashioning some generalization, then I would suggest you keep your opinion to yourself because you sound completely clueless. Travel a bit and learn professions are not honorable by nature. The people who work those professions earn the right to call themselves honorable by how they conduct themselves every day. There endeth the lesson of the day.
I have worked for federal judges in the Second Circuit and Fifth Circuit (those encompass multiple states, not just some single court in NY). I have seen the disciplinary committees and the results. The rules are in place, and are enforced (happy to provide links for those google challenged souls who cannot find the published information from many state and federal courts). I have no clue what this State NY "broken system" is, because I have no context for his background or experience in making that claim. YOUGOTMOSSED cites 1 complaint and states nothing happened, then offers theories as to why that system doesn't work. I would submit that is a pretty small sample size for such a sweeping generalization.
And for the record, I stated in my reply to you, with reference to the actual ethical standard (candor), that there are penalties for dishonesty to courts, both license (rules of professional responsibility) and money (court sanctions). You asked me about the specific argument in Brady's case, and I explained why that would be challenging under the facts of this case and specific to a court order. As stated also, violations of professional responsibility are raised to committees, not courts, and have no bearing on the decision in court. I never stated that could not be done because that was not what you asked me to explain.