- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 30,681
- Reaction score
- 23,359
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Just wait. If Revis leaves, some people will go back to calling him Mevis. If a McCourty leaves he was always an above average safety.People around here have taken to disparaging pretty much every NFL player that's not in a Patriots uniform. That's every bit as stupid as people proclaiming the Patriots are done because they haven't signed 14 all pros already.
....... They could (not will, but could) make a huge jump in just one year, if the new HC/GM duo do things well.
Why would anyone assume the defense would improve under Ryan after watching him fail in NJ?No to criticize you but why does everyone assume that there wont be any issue for Buffalo to transition to Rex Ryan.
Yes they played well late last year, but it was an entirely different coaching staff.
You are not elite until your level of play and the win column actually confirm that. Anybody can be a winner in the offseason.
Wonder if they cut Harvin now...
My initial take on Marshall trade: They replace one headache (Harvin) with another, but Marshall is better and cost less money. #nyk
[/URL]This has to mean Percy Harvin will be cut. The pick to Seattle will remain a 6th-rnder if they do. We'll see what they sent to Chicago. [URL='https://twitter.com/hashtag/nyj?src=hash']#nyj
Ugh, Jets got Eric Decker and all we get is some scrub from Carolina?
Ugh, Dolphins got Wallace and all we have to replace Welker is a fragile downgrade in Edelman
Sad that Marshall is pretty much going to the Jets just because it makes his Inside the NFL gig an easier commute.
Only thing missing is now a QB. Let's see where Hoyer lands.. would be funny if It is all Pats QBs and Tannehill..
Didn't the playoffs and the Super Bowl pretty much prove that alot of this all comes down to coaching and discipline?
Marshall is a very good weapon.
He was a very good weapon for Miami the two years he was THEIR big FA pickup.
The results still didn't change anything. They were 13-19.
1) How is cutting Harvin and signing Marshall and presumably a slot receiver with savings be a bad deal for the jets?
2) Are the jets really years away if they sign Hoyer (and draft Mariota)?
3) The jets will have $56M after cutting Harvin. Isn't that enough to sign
A) Hoyer
B) a slot receiver
C) 2 top secondary players
D) a top RB
and still have significant money ($20M or so) left over for additional needs?
4) Is it an awful offense to have Hoyer, Marshall, Decker, a free agent WR, a free agent TE and a free agent RB as their core.
5) Is it an awful defense if $25M of FIRST YEAR cap costs are paid on upgrading the defense?
======
Th biggest problem of the jets has been and player evaluation. Perhaps a new GM and coach could change that with $56M in hand.
He wasn't that good in Miami, which is one of the main things I would be worried about if I was a Jets fan. If they get that Marshall instead of the Marshall that shows up for Cutler, then this trade will be kind of a waste. Since then, he's allegedly taken responsibility for his mental health and has been getting his BPD treated, but as someone who has immediate family members with BPD, I can totally see how that would make someone an untenable locker room presence. And given how this last season went down with Marshall, I think that that will be a major issue for the rest of his career. You're never going to really know if you're getting the mature, likable, skilled Marshall who can help you win, or the childish, paranoid, conflict-sowing Marshall who bails the second things go bad and does more harm than good.
That's exactly why I would have no interest at all in giving him guaranteed money, but if you can get him with zero guaranteed dollars and you're the Jets, then sure, why not. He knows he's gone if he acts up.
.....and there is a rookie, no experienced, HC there also.
Great mixture.
It definitely has a lot of potential not to be. But again, if it's a problem you just cut him and you're out a grand total of a fifth round pick and $0 in dead money. It's the definition of a low-risk, high-reward move.
Hey, I like Brian Hoyer as much as the next guy. But you seem to be waaaaay overrating him. The guy threw for a 55% completion percentage and had 12 TD-13 INTs last year.
I would agree if they were taking on guaranteed money as part of the deal, but they're not. If they need to free up the money and/or if he declines in the next 2 years, they can cut him and all it will have cost them is a 5th round pick. There's just not a ton of risk there. The one thing that would normally worry me--the opportunity cost of investing ~$8M in cap space that could go to someone else--doesn't even apply here since they'll be saving cap money if they cut Harvin.
And I don't think a rapid decline at age 32-33 is a foregone conclusion at all. WRs with Marshall's skills tend to age pretty well. Even once his speed goes, he'll still be a surehanded big body outside. Rather than worrying about physical decline, I'd be a lot more worried about his reputation as a mentally unstable locker room cancer who quits on teams. And if that manifests, they can just cut him without any dead money. At a bare minimum, he's a better gamble than Harvin.
I'm also not totally convinced that they're 3 years away from competing. If Bowles is good and they unearth a competent QB and draft some OL talent, they could be a competitive team pretty quickly. I don't think it'll happen, but this isn't the 2012 Jets that had no path to competitiveness within 2 years. Idzik cleaned up that mess pretty effectively.