- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 903
- Reaction score
- 887
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You don't want any D-linemen playing all the snaps. You would sacrifice ultimate talent just to keep rotating fresh legs into the game.
I couldn't agree more.
Certainly, Vince Wilfork, even as an older player, offers more in that capacity than a JAG.
A lot depends on how much he offers given his injury, and how high the price is.
I'm confused. Determning whether a player is worth the cost, or using the money on someone else is hate?Not sure how people more concerned about 7 Mil in cap space than Vince isnt hate.
Because its got everything to do with whether he can recover.Not sure how arguing over whether he is 350 or 400 LBS isnt hate.
Or potential value, depending upon rehab.Again clearly the Patriots see some sort of value in the player otherwise he would have been cut already.
Who said he is worth nothing? I think there is a lot of doubt as to whether he is worth 7.5mill, and almost as much if he is worth 4mill.I assume they know his weight and I assume they have a value they think he is worth that is more than $0 and for anyone on here to treat one of our favorite players over the last 10 years as if he is worth nothing is clearly hating on the player.
Can you show me who said he was worthless?The idea that he is worthless is insulting and not fair to the player or the team.
Assuming his achilles has healed, then Wilfork could be worth keeping for two or three more seasons. Probably not as the every down player he has been, but as a rotational player. Bring him in on the run down package. Obviously, you don't want to be paying $8 million a year for that, but when you factor in his veteral leadership, there is some price that makes him an attractive role player going forward.
You don't want any D-linemen playing all the snaps. You would sacrifice ultimate talent just to keep rotating fresh legs into the game. Certainly, Vince Wilfork, even as an older player, offers more in that capacity than a JAG.
I'm confused. Determning whether a player is worth the cost, or using the money on someone else is hate?
Because its got everything to do with whether he can recover.
Or potential value, depending upon rehab.
Who said he is worth nothing? I think there is a lot of doubt as to whether he is worth 7.5mill, and almost as much if he is worth 4mill.
I don't want to pay more than he is worth, because the team will not be as good. That isn't hate.
It isn't sentimental, but I didn't realize sentimentality was a good factor in sound personnel decisions.
Can you show me who said he was worthless?
Can you show me who said he was worthless?
cause its got everything to do with whether he can recover.
I'm confused. Determning whether a player is worth the cost, or using the money on someone else is hate?
Eh, it happens every year. If you acknowledge that moving on from a 'core' Patriot might not be the worst idea in existence, let alone advocate for it, a certain number of normally reasonable posters just won't be able to handle it, and accusations will start flying. We saw it last year with Welker, a couple years ago with Seymour (that was the closest I've come to completely losing perspective over a favorite player leaving), etc. If Wilfork's gone, then it's happening again.
At a certain point, the Pats move on from everyone. It's how they stay competitive. It happened to a bunch of guys who were just an important as Vince, and it'll happen to Vince too if he isn't willing to make steep compromises. The only players who avoid it are the ones who accept what they are, voluntarily lower their cap hits, and in doing so keep themselves and their cap hits workable for the Pats. Rodney and Tedy did that, and Brady is doing it as we speak. Even Rodney said that he was borderline forced out: the Pats would have cut him if he hadn't retired.
Vince has expressed an unwillingness to do that thus far, and he's gone unless he changes course.
Eh, it happens every year. If you acknowledge that moving on from a 'core' Patriot might not be the worst idea in existence, let alone advocate for it, a certain number of normally reasonable posters just won't be able to handle it, and accusations will start flying. We saw it last year with Welker, a couple years ago with Seymour (that was the closest I've come to completely losing perspective over a favorite player leaving), etc. If Wilfork's gone, then it's happening again.
At a certain point, the Pats move on from everyone. It's how they stay competitive. It happened to a bunch of guys who were just an important as Vince, and it'll happen to Vince too if he isn't willing to make steep compromises. The only players who avoid it are the ones who accept what they are, voluntarily lower their cap hits, and in doing so keep themselves and their cap hits workable for the Pats. Rodney and Tedy did that, and Brady is doing it as we speak. Even Rodney said that he was borderline forced out: the Pats would have cut him if he hadn't retired.
Vince has expressed an unwillingness to do that thus far, and he's gone unless he changes course.
All of this talk is speculation based upon a remark by Jerry ThorntonI am amazed to see all the medical experts who are sure that Wilfork is worth the $8M of 2014 money he wants for his services. There is no sugar coating this. If Wilfork does not have an amazing recovery (and we're all rooting for him), he will not be worth this kind of money.
Obviously, I am misunderstanding the positions of some posters.
IMHO (as patchick suggested), the team must have SOME very positive health information or they wouldn't even be considering restructures or extensions at this point.
To clarify, I would like folks to suggest contracts that we should be willing to sign with Wilfork now. I'll start.
POSSIBLE WILFORK CONTRACT
3/$15M including an $6M bonus and salaries of $2M, $3M and $4M. In addition, there could be incentives. I cannot imagine Wilfork signing for less. Personally, I would not want the team to offer more. As I have said, I am presuming that the team has excellent medical news, otherwise no new contract makes sense at this point.
I am amazed to see all the medical experts who are sure that Wilfork is worth the $8M of 2014 money he wants for his services. There is no sugar coating this. If Wilfork does not have an amazing recovery (and we're all rooting for him), he will not be worth this kind of money.
Obviously, I am misunderstanding the positions of some posters.
IMHO (as patchick suggested), the team must have SOME very positive health information or they wouldn't even be considering restructures or extensions at this point.
To clarify, I would like folks to suggest contracts that we should be willing to sign with Wilfork now. I'll start.
POSSIBLE WILFORK CONTRACT
3/$15M including an $6M bonus and salaries of $2M, $3M and $4M. In addition, there could be incentives. I cannot imagine Wilfork signing for less. Personally, I would not want the team to offer more. As I have said, I am presuming that the team has excellent medical news, otherwise no new contract makes sense at this point.
Wilfork had surgery on October 2nd that was nearly seven months ago. It is extremely likely that his Achilles is completely healed and now it is a question of getting back into football shape. In 2012 Wilfork dropped a solid 30lbs between OTAs and the opening of camp this concern about him being to fat to play football is ridiculous in my opinion. We are talking about a player who is consistently recognized as an offseason workout award winner, why do posters feel so inclined to believe he has just let himself go.
If Wilfork was in fact this fat slobbering mess that was not going to be able to play do people really believe he would still be here and wouldn't have been cut outright long ago?
I am amazed to see all the medical experts who are sure that Wilfork is worth the $8M of 2014 money he wants for his services. There is no sugar coating this. If Wilfork does not have an amazing recovery (and we're all rooting for him), he will not be worth this kind of money.
Obviously, I am misunderstanding the positions of some posters.
IMHO (as patchick suggested), the team must have SOME very positive health information or they wouldn't even be considering restructures or extensions at this point.
To clarify, I would like folks to suggest contracts that we should be willing to sign with Wilfork now. I'll start.
POSSIBLE WILFORK CONTRACT
3/$15M including an $6M bonus and salaries of $2M, $3M and $4M. In addition, there could be incentives. I cannot imagine Wilfork signing for less. Personally, I would not want the team to offer more. As I have said, I am presuming that the team has excellent medical news, otherwise no new contract makes sense at this point.